![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 334, 799-804 (1998) 3. Results and spectral fits3.1. Core cm-mm spectraThe core spectra for 3C 47, 3C 207 and 3C 334 are plotted in Fig. 1, using data from Tables 3, 4, 5, and 6. Our 1995 data, which will be used for the spectral energy distribution (SED) fits, are plotted as open circles. The unusually high IRAS 60µm points appear on the right in each figure as filled circles. Literature data are plotted as stars, the 1982/1983 VLA archive data as filled triangles. All errors are within the sizes of the points. The following remarks can be made for the individual objects.
3.1.1. 3C 47An archival VLA 5 GHz dataset (observed by Ekers in June 1982, C-array) appeared in good agreement with our observations: no evidence for core variability is seen. Also the literature data show no sign of cm variability over the last twenty years. Since this quasar seems to have a stable core, we decided to include the 1.4 GHz datapoint (1985 observation, VLA A-array) from Fernini et al. (1991) in our fitting procedure. 3.1.2. 3C 207For this source we retrieved VLA archive observations at C- and
U-band, made by Wardle in March 1982 (A-array) and May 1983 (C-array)
respectively. The core flux densities are in good agreement with our
1995 VLA data. Also, most literature data show no large discrepancies
with respect to our data. However, Hough (1986) reports changes of
3.1.3. 3C 334An extensive archival VLA data set was available for this quasar,
observed by Perley in January 1983 (C-array). Observations were
carried out in C-, U-, and K-band. 3C 334 displays substantial core
variability with respect to our 1995 data, as seen from Figs. 1
and 3. Fig. 3 displays 5 GHz core flux density values,
measured at 3.2. Core spectral energy distributionsTo obtain a good estimate of the (beamed) nonthermal 60µm flux density, we fitted curves to the nearly simultaneous 1995 cm and mm data. As mentioned above, for 3C 47 and 3C 207 we added the 20cm (L-band) points from Fernini et al. (1991) and Bogers et al. (1994) respectively. Upper limits are excluded from the fitting procedures. The fitted curves can subsequently be extrapolated into the far-infrared. However, the shape of the curve is a priori unknown. We therefore used two different models. First we fitted a parabola, which is an empirical result for blazar spectra (Landau et al., 1986). In the light of the unification theory and provided we are dealing with single components, these parabolic fits can be used to fit core spectra for double-lobed quasars. It should be noted however that Brown et al. (1989) found evidence for double components in their blazar sample. We will come back to this issue in Sect. 4.1. Second we used the theoretical spectrum of a single self-absorbed
synchrotron source, which has a
Given the upper limits at 1cm and 7mm, a parabola does not yield a good fit to the 3C 47 data when we include the 3mm point (dashed parabola in Fig. 2a). Leaving out this 3mm point, a single parabola does fit the 3C 47 data remarkably well (solid parabola in Fig. 2a). A secondary (sub)mm component may be causing the rather high 3mm point. In the case of 3C 334, the parabola does fit well (solid parabola in Fig. 2c), but the Q-band upper limit is below our fit. If we exclude the 3mm point from the fit procedure, the parabola does not change significantly. The dashed parabola is a fit including the Q-band upper limit and excluding the 3mm point. As can be seen immediately, only in 3C 207 the IRAS flux density
may suffer from substantial nonthermal contamination, adopting the
high frequency powerlaw fit. For the other two quasars the
far-infrared point is far above the extrapolated nonthermal value,
leaving a factor of 100 to account for. Note that especially 3C 47
stands out: the IRAS point is even higher than the radio peak flux
density. The extrapolated values of the FIR flux density for different
models are compared with the observed values in Table 7.
Table 7. Comparison of measured total and extrapolated nonthermal FIR flux densities, in mJy. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998 Online publication: June 2, 1998 ![]() |