 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 335, L5-L8 (1998)
1. Introduction
After 31 years since the discovery of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), the
origin of such brief gamma-ray flashes remains unknown. The observed
isotropy of GRBs in the sky, could only be explained by theoretical
models where GRBs originate either in a extended halo around the
Galaxy or arise from sources at cosmological distances. Before the
launch of the BeppoSAX satellite, the poor localization capability of
the GRB detectors made the searches at other wavelengths
unfruitful.
The breakthrough took place in 1997 when the first X-ray afterglows
were observed by the BeppoSAX, RXTE, ROSAT and ASCA satellites (Costa
et al. 1997, Heise et al. 1997a, Marshall et al. 1997, Greiner et al.
1998, Murakami 1998). They were able to localize the fading X-ray
emission that followed the more energetic gamma-ray photons once the
GRB event had ended. This emission (the afterglow) extends to longer
wavelengths, and the good accuracy in the position determination by
BeppoSAX (typically radius error boxes) has led
to the discovery of the first optical counterparts for GRB 970228 (van
Paradijs et al. 1997, Guarnieri et al. 1997), and GRB 970508 (Bond
1997, Djorgovski et al. 1997, Castro-Tirado et al. 1998), greatly
improving our understanding of these puzzling sources. The measurement
of the redshift for the GRB 970508 optical counterpart (Metzger et al.
1997) has established that one GRB, maybe all, lie at cosmological
distances.
GRB 971214 is the third GRB with a known optical counterpart. It
was detected by the BeppoSAX Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM, Frontera et
al. 1997) on Dec 14.97 1997, as a 25 s long-structured gamma-ray
burst. Simultaneous to the detection of the GBM, the Wide Field
Cameras (WFC, Jager et al. 1997) on board BeppoSAX provided an
accurate position (a radius error box at a 3
confidence level, Heise et al. 1997b) that
allowed deep optical, infrared and radio observations. The position
was also consistent with the one given by the all-sky monitor on RXTE
(Bradt et al. 1993) and by the BATSE/Ulysses annulus (Kippen et al.
1997). When BeppoSAX pointed its Narrow-Field Instruments (NFI) to the
GRB position, on Dec 15.25 ( 6.5 hours after the
burst), a previously unknown variable X-ray source was found inside
the WFC error box (Antonelli et al. 1997) which was identified as the
X-ray afterglow of GRB 971214. Soon after, Halpern et al. (1997)
reported the presence of a fading object inside the WFC GRB error box,
based on two I-band images separated 24 hours. The object was
afterwards confirmed as the counterpart of GRB 971214 by means of
additional observations at other wavelengths: R-band (Castander et al.
1997, Diercks et al. 1998), I-band (Rhoads 1997) and J-band (Tanvir et
al. 1997). No detections in the K-band were reported in the
literature, although observations performed on Dec 15.54 imposed an
upper limit of K 18.5 (Garcia et al. 1997). As
it will be explained later, this upper limit will be used to
constraint the power-law index and the position
of the possible maximum of the light curve.
We report here the detection of the GRB 971214 counterpart in the
near infrared (IR) by means of two -band images
taken at Calar Alto on Dec 15.12 and 15.18 (mean observing time, only
3.5 and 5 hours after the
gamma-ray event). The second image is almost simultaneous to the
beginning of the observations performed by the BeppoSAX narrow-field
instruments. We discuss whether our observations are in agreement with
the extrapolation of the power-law seen at other bands in later
epochs.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: June 12, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |