Astron. Astrophys. 336, 539-544 (1998)
6. Concluding remarks
Asymptotic Expansions (23) and (24) for and
differ from the corresponding asymptotic
expansions (164) and (165) in Paper I. Moreover, boundary Condition
(25) and matching Conditions (40) stand for Conditions (154), (155),
and (166) of Paper I.
We have verified the validity of asymptotic Expansion (23) for the
polytropic models with indices in the range of
values of from 0.01 to 0.001. The relative
errors of the values of found in comparison to
the exact values are presented in Fig. 2. For the three models,
the relative errors are smaller than from
on and decrease below as
becomes smaller than 0.001.
![[FIGURE]](img99.gif) |
Fig. 2. Relative errors of the values in comparison to the exact values determined by integration of the full fourth-order system of equations governing forced oscillations.
|
A main motivation for the construction of the asymptotic
representation of low-frequency, non-resonant dynamic tides has been
the derivation of an asymptotic expansion for the Eulerian
perturbation of the gravitational potential that is generated at the
star's surface by the tidal distortion. This asymptotic expansion is
useful for studies of dynamic effects of tides in close binaries as
the apsidal motion.
The asymptotic expansion for the Eulerian perturbation of the
gravitational potential at the star's surface can be derived by means
of Expression (32) of Paper I and Expression (23) of this paper. It
follows that, to order ,
![[EQUATION]](img101.gif)
The Eulerian perturbation of the gravitational potential of order
that is generated at the star's surface by a
low-frequency, non-resonant dynamic tide turns out to be determined
simply by the values of the function and its
gradient at the star's surface.
From the asymptotic representation of low-frequency, non-resonant
dynamic tides to order , one passes on to the
first asymptotic representation of low-frequency free oscillation
modes in the star by setting the mass
of the companion equal to zero. According to
Definition (2) of Paper I, the small parameter
then becomes equal to zero. Consequently, boundary Condition (40) of
Paper I, which relates the function and its
first derivative at the star's surface, becomes homogeneous and can
generally no more be satisfied by a solution
different from zero. The fact that the solution for
is identically zero greatly simplifies the
asymptotic representation in the various regions of the star.
First, from Condition (25) it now results that
![[EQUATION]](img106.gif)
Secondly, matching Condition (40) remains valid and is equivalent
with Condition (129) of Smeyers et al. (1995). From the matching
condition, it follows that
![[EQUATION]](img107.gif)
so that the function too is identically
zero, and
![[EQUATION]](img108.gif)
Hence, the asymptotic solutions for the divergence and the radial
component of the Lagrangian displacement are purely oscillatory. From
to a sufficiently large distance from
, they take the form
![[EQUATION]](img109.gif)
and, in the boundary layer near , the form
![[EQUATION]](img110.gif)
From asymptotic Expansion (41), it follows that the Eulerian
perturbation of the gravitational potential at the star's surface is
equal to zero at the order of asymptotic approximation considered, as
was observed by Smeyers et al. (1995).
The same authors also noted that asymptotic Solutions (45) and (46)
even apply to the -modes of the equilibrium
sphere with uniform mass density when one replaces the frequency
by and
by from the starting
equations on. The asymptotic solutions can then be compared with the
known analytical solutions (see Ledoux and Walraven 1958, Sect.
76). From their analysis, Smeyers et al. concluded that the asymptotic
approximation is excellent.
One point may be stressed here. From the analytical solution for
the radial component of the Lagrangian displacement, the following
approximation of the lowest order in can be
derived:
![[EQUATION]](img117.gif)
Hence, in the lowest-order approximation, the radial component of
the Lagrangian displacement is equal to zero at ,
while the divergence of the Lagrangian displacement is different from
zero at that point. This is reproduced by our asymptotic Solutions
(20) and (21) at the same point. The lowest-order solution for a free
-mode of the equilibrium sphere with uniform
mass density is given by the terms of order . At
that order, it is seen that indeed and
.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: July 20, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |