 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 336, 1056-1064 (1998)
3. Collision velocities
From the obtained data base of close encounters, histograms of the
collision velocities for the eight collision populations are shown in
Fig. 1, and their mean, median and rms collision velocities are given
in Table 2. Some general conclusions can be drawn from these
histograms. There is a large spread in the collision velocities, from
1 to 15 . The high velocity tails and sharp
cut-off at low velocities gives a clear non-Gaussian shape of the
velocity distributions. There are also very narrow peaks in the
velocity distributions probably from specific asteroid pairs making
series of encounters at similar geometries (these are smoothed out by
the binning in the histograms in Fig. 1). Considering the wide range
in semi-major axes of the objects, the mean velocities are quite
similar, ranging from 4.1 to 5.3 in the
different collisional populations, with one exception, HH collisions
which have = 3.1 . The
velocity distribution of TT collisions have a less pronounced and
broader peak than the other populations. The MM distribution have
mean, median and rms velocities of 5.28, 4.97, and
5.78 , which is remarkably similar to the result
by Bottke et al. (1994) in their Fig. 7, (5.29, 5.03, and
5.79 ).
![[TABLE]](img12.gif)
Table 2.
The obtained mean, median, rms collision velocities, standard deviations, and number of close encounters for the populations and groups shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
![[FIGURE]](img13.gif) |
Fig. 1. Histograms of collision velocities for the different populations: MM) main-belt-main-belt, CC) Cybele-Cybele, HH) Hilda-Hilda, TT) Trojan-Trojan, CM) Cybele-main-belt, HC) Hilda-Cybele, HM) Hilda-main-belt, and HT) Hilda-Trojan collisions (see also Table 2). The bin size is 0.5 .
|
As mentioned above only mutual collisions among the Hilda asteroids
have a significantly lower mean velocity. As pointed out by Marzari et
al. (1996) there are three main reasons for this: i) lower
keplerian velocities at larger semi-major axes. ii) quite low
eccentricities and inclinations of Hilda asteroids (Table 1).
iii) a non-random distribution of the apsidal lines of the Hilda
orbits preventing collisions between two Hilda asteroids if one is
close to aphelion and the other is close to perihelion, which is the
orbital configuration giving the largest relative velocity. The
corresponding for HH collisions in the study by
Marzari et al. (1996) is 2.9 .
The mean collision velocity for HM is about
0.4 lower than in MM collisions. This difference
is quite small because the Hilda asteroids plunge into the outer parts
of the main-belt when they approach their perihelia (i.e., at their
highest orbital velocity), and will collide with main-belt objects
having higher keplerian velocities. The mean velocity of HC collisions
is about 1.1 lower than MM collisions, mainly
due to lower keplerian velocities of the objects in the Cybele and
Hilda groups.
The mean collision velocity of Trojan asteroids are similar to the
main-belt value, despite the lower keplerian velocities at the
heliocentric distance of the Trojan clouds. This is fully compensated
by a higher mean inclination of the Trojan asteroids compared to
main-belt objects (Table 1). The collision velocities of the Trojan
asteroids is likely to increase when the Trojan sample is complete,
due to the discovery bias against high inclination Trojan asteroids.
This bias arises from from the observing strategy applied by most
surveys (i.e., they only search for objects relatively close to the
ecliptic plane). This is consistent with our result, which is about
0.2 higher than the result by Marzari et al.
(1996) which used a smaller sample (114 Trojans) which had a smaller
mean inclination ( = 15.5 )
compared to the sample used in this paper =
16.5 . The collision velocity distributions of
the four groups (Fig. 2 and Table 2) are similar to the dominating
collision population in each group, (i.e., MM, CM, HM, and TT
collisions for main-belt, Cybele, Hilda, and Trojan asteroids,
respectively).
![[FIGURE]](img18.gif) |
Fig. 2. Histograms of the obtained collision velocities for main-belt, Cybele, Hilda and Trojan asteroids. The bin size is 0.5 .
|
3.1. Velocity components of the collisions
The Cartesian velocity components ( ) of the
collisions are given in Table 3, which lists the mean velocities and
the standard deviations for the populations. The
components (i.e., perpendicular to the ecliptic
plane) are 1.5-5.0 times larger than the corresponding
and components. The
populations involving Hilda asteroids (HH, HM, HC, and HT) have
/ in the lower part of
this range, from / = 1.5
for HH collisions to / =
2.2 for HT collisions. This is due to the low mean inclinations of
Hilda asteroids ( = 7 )
giving a more isotropic distribution of the velocity components than
in the other groups. This leads to the conclusion that the
inclinations of the orbits to a large extent determine the relative
velocities in the asteroid belt, which is consistent with the result
from earlier investigation (Farinella & Davis 1992; Bottke et al.
1994; Marzari et al. 1996).
![[TABLE]](img26.gif)
Table 3.
The obtained collision velocity components , and of the populations. The mean and standard deviations of the relative velocity components are given.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: July 27, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |