![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 337, 962-965 (1998) 3. Theoretical considerationsThe identification of mechanisms responsible for the dissipation of
shear flow energy within an accretion disc is an active field of
research, because of its importance in determining transport across
the disc and onto the compact object. If, as has been suggested (Bak
et al 1988, Mineshige et al. 1994), the combined global effects of
local transport physics result in SOC, observational signatures of the
type described above will emerge. It is widely accepted (see, for
example, Longair (1994) and Narayan (1997)) that anomalous viscosity
caused by MHD turbulence probably plays an important role in the flux
of angular momentum within accretion discs. MHD turbulence can arise
naturally in accretion discs, see for example the instability
mechanisms proposed by Tagger et al. (1990), Vishniac et al. (1990),
and Balbus & Hawley (1991). It has also been pointed out (Chen et
al. 1995) that there exist ranges of accretion rate
Before considering the model of Geertsema & Achterberg (1992)
in greater detail, let us turn to its results. Fig. 12 of
Geertsema & Achterberg (1992) shows the calculated times series of
energy dissipation events within the disc. We note that this is
qualitatively very similar to the observed time series of energy
dissipation measured in an experimental ricepile displaying SOC,
Fig. 2c of Frette et al. (1996), and in a related mathematical
model of Dendy & Helander (1997, Fig. 3, and 1998,
Fig. 5). More quantitatively, Fig. 13 of Geertsema &
Achterberg (1992) shows the power spectrum of energy dissipated by MHD
disc turbulence, which displays the Given the clear indications of SOC emerging from the MHD turbulence model of Geertsema & Achterberg (1992), it will be of interest to establish how it has arisen. A full explanation must await diagnostic analysis of the code runs generated by this model. Pending this, we conclude the present section by seeking to identify some of the relevant salient features. In outline, the model of Geertsema & Achterberg (1992) is constructed as follows. The accretion disc is regarded as a differentially rotating
turbulent MHD fluid, and is modelled by a reduced system of equations
reflecting the most important features of three-dimensional MHD
turbulence. The disc is assumed to be thin in comparison with its
diameter, and the flow is taken to be subsonic and hence
incompressible. The possible existence of a large-scale magnetic field
is neglected, and the only turbulent structures considered have a
length scale shorter than the height of the disc, making the
turbulence essentially three-dimensional. In a coordinate system
rotating with the disc angular velocity where As these equations are still too complex for a numerical treatment
over a sufficiently large dynamic range in scales, they were
simplified further following a suggestion by Desnyanski & Novikov
(1974) in the context of hydrodynamics, and later applied to MHD by
Gloaguen et al. (1985). In this approximation, the space of wave
vectors In the three-dimensional generalisation of this approximation
scheme, the discretisation is made by dividing the
These equations, which are taken to model the turbulent cascade of
MHD, were solved numerically by Geertsema & Achterberg (1992).
They found that the turbulent shear stress can be very large, and has
large, chaotic fluctuations on time scales of a few rotation periods.
Perhaps the most striking feature of the simulations is, however, that
the dissipation of energy at the smallest scales of the turbulent
cascade is very intermittent. Energy is released in avalanches with a
wide range of sizes, and the power spectrum of the dissipation rate
obeys a ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998 Online publication: August 27, 1998 ![]() |