 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 338, 200-208 (1998)
2. Observations and reduction
2.1. The observations
The HI synthesis measurements were obtained with the Westerbork
Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT); this instrument consists of 10 fixed
and 4 movable parabolic dishes of 25 metres diameter, together
spanning a baseline of 2.8 km. A
integration produces a map of a field as large as the primary beam
(FWHM of ). In such a map each source produces
grating responses in form of ellipses, with diameters of
in right ascension and
in declination, and multiples thereof. Doubling the integration time,
with the movable telescopes moved to different positions, results in
doubling of the diameters of the grating responses. We used
integrations; therefore the smallest grating
responses had radii of and
in and
, respectively. This can cause confusion
problems for extended objects; see Sect. 3.2.
Another shortcoming of synthesis observations in general is the
lack of short-spacing information; the shortest spacing available to
us was 36 meters. As a result, very large structures (e.g. a constant
background across the primary beam) are not detectable.
The parameters of our observations are summarized in
Table 1.
![[TABLE]](img35.gif)
Table 1. Observational parameters of WSRT HI obervations of HVC 100-7+100 and HVC 347+35-112
2.2. Calibration of the data
The data were calibrated by observing standard point sources,
before and after each integration, for
30 minutes on each of two frequencies, shifted 2 MHz (i.e.,
422 km s-1) on either side from the central
frequency used on the HVC field. The shift is necessary to avoid
Galactic absorption effects in the calibrator observations.
From the observations of the calibrators we derived gain and phase
corrections, making use of "redundancy" (Wieringa 1992), and moreover
using the self-cal method (Noordam & de Bruyn 1982). The
averages of gains and phase corrections from all four calibration
observations were applied to the data, for each velocity.
2.3. Additional smoothing
Since the signals were very weak, we used only baselines up to
1440 meters, giving basic angular resolutions of
by . In order to improve
the signal/noise ratio, we performed additional smoothing in right
ascension and declination, resulting in synthesized beams as given in
Table 1. Also, we performed box smoothing in velocity over seven
channels, resulting in a velocity resolution of
7.6 km s-1.
2.4. Cleaning of the maps
The grating responses at distance
(Sect. 2.1) can result in confusion problems for extended
structures. The first object, HVC 100-7+100, turned out to be so
small that the grating responses cause no problems, although the
missing short spacings can still distort our observations. However,
for HVC 347+35-112 the grating responses give serious problems.
Moreover, since this object is at negative declination, only part of
the required hour-angle coverage could be
obtained. This results in a synthesized antenna beam (or point spread
function) with strong (positive or negative) side-lobes, as shown in
the first panel of Fig. 4. Striking are the butterfly-like near
side-lobes and the x-shaped "spokes" at greater angular distance.
The method CLEAN (Högbom 1974, Schwarz 1978) was used to
remove side-lobe effects as much as possible. For HVC 100-7+100
cleaning is straightforward; but for HVC 347+35-112, where the
u v plane is not fully sampled, cleaning can
give ambiguous results. In order to set additional constraints, we
chose two regions (see Fig. 1) where cleaning was allowed to put
-functions.
![[FIGURE]](img38.gif) |
Fig. 1. Example of cleaning. The grating ring responses at a distance indicated by the horizontal arrow can give ambiguities. CLEAN can further have problems with the strong negative sidelobes (30%); in order to avoid such problems, two boxes around the strongest two positive features were defined, in which searching by CLEAN was allowed.
|
The cleaned channel maps for the appropriate velocities are
displayed in Figs. 2 and 4 for the two objects. The first
two panels give the synthesized antenna-pattern and the continuum map,
respectively; the third panel shows the distribution of HI column
density in the HVC (Sect. 2.5).
![[FIGURE]](img50.gif) |
Fig. 2. Maps of HVC 100-7+100. The top-left panel shows the synthesized beam, with maximum 1. The top-middle panel shows the continuum; the two background sources have fluxes of 155 and 100 mJy, respectively. The top-right panel gives the HI column densities (or "total hydrogen"); contour values, in units of atoms cm-2, are -0.66, -0.33, (dashed), , , , , . The remaining panels show monochromatic brightness distributions, at velocities spaced by 4.13 km s-1 from to km s-1, as given in the top-left corner of each panel; brightness temperatures are shown in gray-scale, identified by scale-bar at top-right, and by contours, with values 0.038 K (dashed), 0.051 K, 0.077 K, 0.102 K, 0.128 K and 0.140 K (dashed). Velocity resolution: 7.6 km s-1; angular resolution: (FWHM), shown by hatched ellipse in continuum panel. The position of the star 4 Lac is marked by an asterisk.
|
2.5. Total HI
The HI column density (sometimes called "total HI") in the HVC was
derived by adding those parts of the CLEANed data cube which show
significant radiation (above 3 ); for this a 3-D
CLEAN was used, with a 3-D Gaussian restoration beam. The intensities
given in mJy beam-1 were scaled
into brightness temperatures [K] using:
![[EQUATION]](img55.gif)
where c: velocity of light, k: Boltzmann's constant,
: frequency of observation,
: frequency of 21-cm line,
: flux density per synthesized beam,
: beam solid angle, and
: FWHM of synthesized clean beam (assumed to be
Gaussian) in right ascension and declination. The values
and are listed in
Table 1. The column density is then:
![[EQUATION]](img62.gif)
The resulting maps are shown in the top-right panels of
Figs 2 and 4. The maps are based on the WSRT observations
only, and are not corrected for the missing short spacings, nor for
the sensitivity differences in the primary beam. These corrections are
applied in the later stages of the reduction: Sects. 2.6and
2.7.
2.6. 21-cm line spectra
From the 3-D cleaned data cube we have determined HI-line
spectra for specific areas of sky, by plotting the brightness
temperatures averaged over such areas as a function of radial
velocity. In Fig. 3a and b we consider the following spectra, all
calculated for the position of the star 4 Lac:
-
The spectrum measured at Westerbork, within the synthesized beam
resulting from the smoothing operations described above (and corrected
for the sensitivity differences within this synthesized beam).
-
The spectrum measured with the 76-meter single dish at Jodrell Bank
(beam: FWHM = 12 arcmin) by Bates et al. (1991).
-
The Westerbork spectrum averaged over the Jodrell Bank beam
(assumed to be Gaussian, with 12 arcmin FWHM).
-
A combination: Spectrum 1 + Spectrum 2 - Spectrum 3,
as discussed in Sect. 2.7.
Since a synthesis telescope is insensitive to extended sources of
radiation, an averaged Westerbork spectrum may contain less flux than
the corresponding single-dish spectrum (see Sect. 3.1).
![[FIGURE]](img64.gif) |
Fig. 3a and b. HI spectra of HVC 100-7+100 at the position of the star 4 Lac (see also text of Sect. 2.6and Sect. 2.7). a Spectrum 3: WSRT data, averaged over Jodrell Bank beam (12 arcmin FWHM). Spectrum 2: Jodrell Bank spectrum (Bates et al., 1991). b Spectrum 1: WSRT data, smoothed to a resolution of arcmin. Spectrum 4: Best estimate of spectrum at star position, obtained as Spectrum 1 + Spectrum 2 - Spectrum 3.
|
2.7. Estimate of the column density at the position of the star
The column densities given by Eq. 2had to be corrected for the
primary beam (Sect. 2.6) and for the effects of the missing short
spacings. The usual method for the latter correction is to process a
series of single-dish maps (obtained from a raster of spectra around
the field centre of the synthesis map), in order to extract the
missing u v-data (zero spacing and short spacings).
This method requires a considerable amount of single-dish data, and
moreover has some fundamental drawbacks (Schwarz & Wakker 1991).
Since we were interested mainly in at the
star's position, , we could use a simpler
approach, described by Schwarz et al. (1995). In short this method
consists of observing the HI spectrum at the position of the star with
a large single-dish telescope (Spectrum 2 in Sect. 2.6);
then subtracting from this the spectrum of the fine-structure, found
from the synthesis observations and smoothed with the single-dish beam
(Spectrum 3); and finally adding the unsmoothed synthesis
spectrum (Spectrum 1). The resulting Spectrum 4
( Sp. 1 + Sp. 2 -Sp. 3) is a good
approximation of the true spectrum at the star's position.
2.8. Derived physical parameters
If the distance D is known, the mass
of atomic hydrogen in the object can be derived from the
column-density (or "total hydrogen") map:
![[EQUATION]](img70.gif)
where is the mass of the hydrogen atom, and
is the column density at position i in
units of .
The density can be derived if we can make an
estimate of the line-of-sight dimension of the cloud, L. The
usual assumption is made that L is similar to the smallest
dimension of the cloud across the sky, ; this
assumption holds for spheres and for filamentary objects, but not for
"pancakes". Then:
![[EQUATION]](img76.gif)
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: September 8, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |