 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 338, 262-272 (1998)
3. Results and analysis
3.1. The C+ line intensity and the C+ to FIR flux ratio
The distribution of the [CII] 158 µm emission is shown
in Fig. 3 as a greyscale plot, overlaid on contours of a
12CO J=3 2 line integrated map,
obtained with the KOSMA 3m telescope (Schneider et al. 1998). The two
data sets match well in angular resolution, with 55" for the FIR and
70" for the CO data. The settings of the 5 5 pixel
arrays of FIFI, together with a box labeling are also displayed. Due
to considerable baseline problems, we decided to reject Arrays 6 and
13 for the data analysis.
![[FIGURE]](img28.gif) |
Fig. 3. Top: A contour plot of the velocity integrated (4-24 km s-1) 12CO J=3 2 intensity (obtained with the KOSMA 3m telescope) is overlaid to a grey scale plot of the 158 µm [CII] emission. Each square marks one setting of the 5 5 pixel FIFI array. The region observed with IRAM (Monoceros Ridge) and displayed in Fig. 5 is indicated. Bottom: The integrated 12CO J=3 2 intensity as a grey scale plot together with a numbering of the FIFI-arrays. The contour levels start at the 3 -level (4.8 K km s-1) and end at 27 3 in steps of 3 . The locations of IR sources are indicated by triangles. The direction of the UV flux of the central stellar cluster NGC 2244 is shown by arrows.
|
The peak C+ intensity is
5 10-4 erg s-
1 cm-2 sr-1 which is about three times the
noise level for one pixel. These intensities are found in the
interface region between molecular cloud and HII region at the
`Monoceros Ridge' (Array 11), in Array 5, and at the position of the
IR source IR06314+0427 (Array 3). The C+ emission in the
RMC is weak, compared to sources observed at similar angular
resolution in which the C+ intensity is typically a factor
10 stronger (e.g. M17, Stutzki et al. 1988; Orion B, Jaffe et al.
1994; Orion A, Herrmann et al. 1997). The emission level in the RMC is
thus comparable to that of the Galactic large-scale [CII] survey at
approximately 4´ angular resolution, obtained with the Japanese
Balloon-Borne Infrared Telescope (BIRT, Shibai et al. 1991), which is
a few 10-4 erg s-
1 cm-2 sr-1. During the same observing run
with FIFI, the PDR region of the S140/L1204 complex reveals an equally
weak C+ intensity of around
4 10-4 erg s-
1 cm-2 sr-1 (Schneider et al. 1995). The
total luminosity of the [CII] 158 µm line in the Galaxy
is 5.4 107 L
(Wright et al. 1991) and 2.8 107
L in the inner Galactic disk (Shibai et al.
1991), so that the few very bright PDR regions like e.g. M17, Orion A
etc., which emit a few thousand L in this line,
can not account for the overall Galatic C+ emission.
Numerous lower density and UV intensity PDR regions contribute
significantly to the observed C+ luminosity.
Though the C+ intensity in each pixel is weak, by
positionally averaging the data of one array we confirm that the
C+ line is significantly detected in every array except No.
17 at or above the 3 -level (see Table 1).
The absolute intensities range between 0.7 and
2.7 10-4 erg s-
1 sr-1 cm-2 and the average value is
1.7 10-4 erg s-
1 sr-1 cm-2. The total intensity by
summing over all arrays is
2.6 10-3 erg s-
1 sr-1 cm-2, which is equivalent to a
total flux of 3.65 10-8 erg s-
1 cm-2 or 2900 L , considering a
distance of 1.6 kpc. From the IRAS 60 µm and
100 µm maps, analyzed by Cox et al. (1990), we adapt a
lower limit for the FIR luminosity of
2.7 105 L ,
averaged across the observed region. We then obtain a higher limit for
the flux ratio / of
approximately 1% which is in accordance, but on the high end, with
values of 0.1% to 1% for other active star forming regions in the
Galaxy and extragalactic nuclei (Howe et al. 1991, Stacey et al.
1991). The average value for the Galaxy is 0.3% (Stacey et al. 1985,
Shibai et al. 1991, Wright et al. 1991). The comparatively high value
of 1% for the Rosette cloud indicates a large efficiency
of grain photoelectrical heating which might be
due to the low incident UV field. Bakes & Tielens (1994)
theoretically modeled the photoelectrical heating mechanism for a wide
range of parameters by considering small grains
( 100 Å) and give an analytical expression
for the heating efficiency for gas temperatures T [K] lower
than 104 K:
![[EQUATION]](img34.gif)
with the far-UV field in units of the Habing
field and the electron density
[cm-3]. A low incident UV field, as it is found in Rosette
(see Sect. 3.2), will lead to a low ionization rate so that the
fraction of neutral particles increase and therefore the heating
efficiency. This is not valid for larger grains
( 100 Å) which absorb half of the UV photons
and contribute not significantly to the heating. Comparison with other
Galactic PDRs shows that a source with an equally high ratio
/ of 1% is NGC 1977 (Howe
et al. 1991) which has an UV flux of only a few Hundret
at the edge of the molecular cloud to the HII
region.
3.2. The large scale C+ emission distribution and its correlation with UV flux
It is now generally accepted that the [CII] 158 µm
fine structure line originates in Photon Dominated Regions (PDRs),
created by FUV radiation, on the surfaces of molecular clumps. The
prominent PDRs studied so far are found in bright and massive
molecular cloud complexes like Orion A (Stacey et al. 1991) or M17
(Stutzki et al. 1988, Meixner et al. 1992). A careful examination of
Fig. 3 reveals that the C+ emitting gas in the Rosette
cloud is intimately mixed with the clumpy molecular material, traced
by the 12CO J=3 2 line. Good examples
of a close morphological correspondence between the structures visible
in the different maps are the regions with the highest signal-to-noise
ratio (Array 3, 11 and 12). Some of the remaining areas seem to lack a
direct morphological correlation which may be due to the low
S/N-ratio. We emphasize, however, that the 2-dimensional projection of
the complex 3-dimensional cloud structure, together with the expected
stratification of the C+/CO transition layer on the clump
surfaces, leads to a merging of foreground and background structures
viewed at many different inclinations.
In order to model the FUV flux from the central OB cluster NGC 2244
into the molecular cloud, we assume that the UV radiation gets blocked
by the clumps. We then estimate an attenuated average flux F
within the molecular cloud by following the arguments of Stutzki et
al. (1988). The flux decreases with 1/ where
R equals the distance to the OB cluster. In addition,
proceeding into the molecular cloud, the UV flux gets blocked by the
dense clumps and is redistributed in angle due to dust scattering.
With representing the radius of the HII region
( 15 pc), the clump volume
filling factor and the diameter of the clumps,
we thus get:
![[EQUATION]](img41.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img42.gif)
The Lyman continuum luminosity L is taken from Cox et al.
(1990) with a value of
L=12.3 105
L . The clump volume filling factor is estimated
by the ratio of hydrogen density to critical density
( / ). From CO
J=1 0 data obtained by Blitz & Thaddeus (1980)
we adapted an average diameter =1.3 pc for the
molecular clumps, and an average hydrogen density of
=580 cm-3. With
=2.9 103 cm-3
we thus obtain =0.15. Together, this implies a
flux variation from about at the molecular
cloud/HII region interface at 15 pc (30´) distance from the
central OB cluster, down to a few to in the
remote part of the cloud, approximatley 30 pc (60´) away.
An independent confirmation of these values is to use the color
temperature derived from the IRAS
60 µm to 100 µm intensity ratio
I(60µm)/I(100µm) and apply it to the model
of Hollenbach et al. (1991) in which becomes a
function of . From Cox et al. (1990), we get a
ratio I(60µm)/I(100µm) of around 0.3 at the
molecular cloud/HII region interface down to 0.23 in the remote part
of the cloud (at the same distances given above). This implies dust
color temperatures of 30 K and 26 K for an assumed dust emissivity law
of . By using Fig. 19 in Hollenbach et al.
(1991) in which I(60µm)/I(100µm) is given as
a function of , we obtain a UV flux of
at the interface and in
the remote part of the cloud. The flux at the interface agrees very
well with our result whereas the value for the flux in the remote
cloud is higher. However, the authors point out that the observational
agreement for regions with low flux ( ) is poor
which might be due to the restriction of the standard low-density PDR
model used, with a one-dimensional slab illuminated from one side.
Fig. 4 shows the calculated flux (using our model with blocking by
clumps) on a logarithmic scale together with 12CO and
13CO J=2 1 and C+ line
intensities along two cuts at constant Galactic latitude. Both cuts
reflect the positional variation of the line integrated intensities,
starting in the HII region and crossing the interface region into the
molecular cloud core.
![[FIGURE]](img59.gif) |
Fig. 4. Middle: Within a map of the integrated KOSMA 12CO J=2 1 intensity, the FIFI arrays of C+ emission are indicated along two cuts at constant galactic latitude ( and ). The triangles mark the positions of IR sources. Top and bottom: The line integrated 12CO and 13CO J=2 1 and C+ intensities are displayed along the two cuts. The C+ intensities are determined by averaging five data points at constant longitude. The error bars at for boff=0´ and for b are representative for all C+ data. The grey line roughly indicates the HII region/molecular cloud border, the continuous line shows the logarithmic decrease of the UV flux and the dashed line the best fit to the decrease of the C+ intensities, leaving out the local peak at IR06314+0427.
|
The lower cut at b covers the
interface region between molecular cloud and HII region at the
Monoceros Ridge. The bend in the line, describing the UV flux,
coincides with the location of the ionization front. Towards the
molecular cloud, there is a sharp increase of CO and C+
intensity within a region of about 2 pc linear extent. The IRAM
13CO J=2 1 observations confirm the
general run of the KOSMA CO and the C+ intensity. However,
small scale variations of the IRAM data which does not match the
C+ emission are due to the different angular resolutions
(12" for the IRAM and 55" for the C+ observations) and the
low S/N-ratio of the C+ data. Further into the cloud, the
C+ emission rapidly decreases. The last datapoint at
l has a C+ intensity of about
10-4 erg s-1 cm-
2 sr-1.
In the upper cut at boff=0´, the
C+ and CO emission peak at the location of the IR source
IR06314+0427. Apart from this local peak which is due to the UV
illumination of a small star cluster (see Sect. 3.3), the
C+ emission gradually drops from the interface region into
the molecular cloud (as long as the local peak at IR06314+0427 is
ignored). The dashed line approximates this smooth decrease of
(1.1 0.1) 10-5 erg s-
1 cm-2 sr-1 / pc. The line runs nearly
parallel to the line describing the attenuation of the UV flux. This
behaviour is in accordance with the models of Hollenbach et al. (1991)
as discussed in Wolfire et al. (1989) in which the C+
intensity scales logarithmicially with the UV flux F, provided
that F is lower than and that the
condition holds. In this parameter space,
self-shielding of H2 and CO becomes important and moves the
transition zone closer to the clump surface and
therewith lowers the C+ column density. As a consequence,
the C+ intensity ( ) decreases and the
C+/CO line ratio drops. This is what we observe in the
Rosette Cloud: close to the HII region at the Monoceros Ridge,
is 600-700 whereas further into the cloud (in a
distance of approx. 10 pc from the Ridge) the ratio is 200-300. This
finding contrasts to higher density and UV flux regions in which the
relation is valid: A constant C+ to
12CO J=1 0 ratio of 4400 was found by
Crawford et al. (1985) in Galactic and extragalactic sources. Jaffe et
al. (1994) derived a ratio of 1300 from their observations of NGC
2024. In these regions, the C+ intensity scales roughly
with (Howe et al. 1991) and is rather
insensitive to the UV flux.
3.3. The small scale C+ emission distribution
As presented in Sect. 3.1 and 3.2, we find direct evidence for the
penetration of UV radiation from the NGC 2244 OB cluster deep into the
adjacent molecular cloud. Though the 158 µm [CII] line
emission is generally rather weak, the regions with stronger
C+ emission are correlated with molecular clumps, traced in
the 12CO J=3 2 line. We will now
discuss these two regions, the `Monoceros Ridge' and the central part
of the cloud, and the detection of C+ emission deep in the
molecular cloud.
C+ emission at the Monoceros Ridge
The Monoceros Ridge region is composed of clumpy molecular gas
(Schneider et al. 1998) and marks the border between the HII region
and molecular cloud and extends diagonally between Array 6 and 16.
This region gives a good example for the strong morphological
correlation between C+ emission, arising from the PDR's on
the molecular clump surface, and CO emission from the interior of the
clump. The peak intensity of the [CII] line in this interface region
is of the order of 4.5 10-4 erg s-
1 cm-2 sr-1 and is found in a clump
containing the IR source IR06306+0437, directly facing the HII region.
A recent IR-survey of Phelps & Lada (1997) indicates that
IR06306+0437 most likely consists of several sources. The IR
luminosity is 1222 L , determined by adding the
IRAS flux densities in the 4 wavelengths bands of 12, 25, 60 and
100 µm. This value does not even account for a single
star of spectral type B3 or B4 and in any case, the photon emission
rate is too low to contribute to the observed strong C+
emission. Unfortunately, no data at wavelengths longer than
100 µm are available which might show a strong
FIR-/submm-emission spectrum. Therefore, by considering the low IRAS
flux value of the cluster, the emission must be ascribed to the PDR
layers of the molecular clumps in this interface region, illuminated
by NGC 2244. The UV flux at this distance to the OB cluster (17 pc in
linear projection) is estimated to be around
(see 3.2).
As an example for the C+ and CO correspondence at higher
angular resolution, we show in Fig. 5 an overlay of the C+
emission as a grey scale and channel maps of the IRAM 13CO
J=2 1 observations (Schneider et al. 1998) at 12"
angular resolution as contours in the region containing Arrays 11 and
12. Because in these arrays the S/N-ratio of the data is rather high,
the good small scale correlation of the [CII]- and CO-emission in the
velocity range between 11 and 17 km s-1 is significant. The
C+ emitting regions are located on the edges of the
molecular clumps, outlined by the CO emission, indicating the presence
of UV illuminated PDRs on the surface of dense molecular clump. The
main CO peak at around 15 km s-1 is close to the position
of the IRAS source (IR06306+0437) and marks a region of intense
C+ emission. The morphologial correlation does not continue
for higher velocities ( 19 km s-1), in
particular the clump at offsets ,
does not show up in C+. However, due
to its high velocity it is presumably located in the background of the
complex.
![[FIGURE]](img75.gif) |
Fig. 5. A grey scale plot of the integrated [CII] 158 µm intensity is overlaid on a contour plot of the IRAM line integrated 13CO J=2 1 intensity (Levels 0.8 (3 ) to 14.6 by 2.3 K km s-1) with 12" angular resolution. The location of the IR source IR6306+437 is indicated by a triangle. The offsets are relative to the position , .
|
C+ emission at the cloud center
Another high intensity C+ emission region is the cloud
center, coinciding with the location of the IR source IR06314+0427
(Array 3) and an extended CO clump. The strong C+ emission
there can not be explained by the UV illumination of the central OB
cluster NGC 2244 alone, the logarithmic decrease of the UV flux (see
the cut at offset b=0´ in Fig. 4) leads to a linear decrease in
C+ intensity. But the observed intensities are locally a
factor of at least 1.5 higher. This suggests that the intense
C+ emission in Array 3 is due to the interaction between a
molecular clump core with the dissociating radiation from a single
young star or a cluster of stars. This source was initially thought to
be a single O7 star (Block 1990) but recent near-IR observations of
Phelps & Lada (1997) revealed a small embedded cluster of stars
though their spectral types are not known. Because no radio continuum
data are available, we roughly estimate the extent of the PDR region
created by the star cluster by assuming a photon emission rate
S of about
7.2 1048 s-1 (Spitzer 1978)
of an O7 star. We derived a Stromgren radius R of 0.29 pc (35")
for a compact HII region around the star by using the relation
R [pc] = 66.9
( / )
from McKee, vanBuren & Lazareff (1984) with the photon rate
in units of 1049 s-1 and
the average hydrogen density n [cm-3] with a value
of 3 103 cm-3, derived from
IRAM 13CO J=2 1 observations (Schneider
et al. 1998).
Even if this source is a cluster of B stars and the photon emission
rate decreased by a factor of 10, it would still be sufficient to
support a compact HII region and create PDRs on the surface of the
surrounding molecular clumps outside this region. This is confirmed by
the KOSMA CO observations: The integrated 12CO
J=3 2 line intensity (contour lines in Fig. 6)
peaks at the position of maximum C+ emission (greyscale),
both close to the location of the IR source. The IR position was taken
from the point source catalog with an positional uncertainty of 25" in
RA and 6" in DEC and a position angle of .
![[FIGURE]](img81.gif) |
Fig. 6. A grey scale plot of the integrated [CII] 158 µm intensity is overlaid on a contour plot of the KOSMA line integrated 12CO J=3 2 intensity (Levels 45 to 110 by 5 K km s-1). The location of the IR source IR06314+0427 is indicated by a triangle. This is an enlargement of the region around array 3.
|
C+ emission in the remote molecular cloud
The arrays 1 and 2 are located deep in the molecular cloud where
the UV flux already decreased to about (Array
2) down to a few (Array 1). Accordingly, the
observed C+ intensities are low, with an average value of
1.3 and 1.1 10-4 erg s-
1 cm-2 sr-1 for Array 1 and 2, which is
just above the noise level (S/N-ratios are 3 and 4). The weak
C+ emission in Array 1 indicates that the proximity of the
strong IR source AFGL 961 nearby does not influence the excitation of
the C+ line. The near-IR survey of Phelps & Lada (1997)
revealed that AFGL 961 consists of a number of embedded bright sources
though it seems not contain a luminous O and/or B star, providing
enough UV flux for creating a PDR region with a C+ emitting
layer.
Therefore, the observed C+ emission is consistent with
the picture that only the UV radiation from the central cluster of the
Rosette nebula, NGC 2244, is responsible for the UV illumination of
the molecular cloud. Due to the clumpiness, the radiation can leak
deep into the cloud and create PDRs on the surfaces of individual
clumps, giving rise to the observed C+ emission. In a
homogeneous molecular cloud, the UV flux is too rapidly attenuated in
order to account for the observed C+ emission deep in the
cloud interior. From CO observations (Schneider 1995), we obtain an
H2-column density of
1.4 1022 cm-2 from the
ionization front to the remote cloud in a distance of 30 pc. This
corresponds to a visual extinction of
Av=14m for a homogeneous cloud
which contrasts to the typical thickness of 3m for
the C+-emitting layer in a PDR in the models of Hollenbach
et al. (1991).
From PDR models (see Sect. 4) we derive a density of
n=104 to 105 cm-3 in the clumps
whereas the average density is 300 cm3 (obtained by
13CO J=2 1 maps at 2´ angular
resolution from Schneider et al. 1998), resulting in a density
contrast of 30-300. A similar value is evaluated by using CO
J=1 0 data obtained by Blitz & Thaddeus
(1980). They derived an average H2-density of
50 cm-3 and because Blitz (1991) argued that 10-50% of the
column density arises from the interclump gas this gives an average
density of 5-25 cm-3 for the interclump medium. Taking the
critical density of the CO 1 0 transition as the
local clump density (103 cm-3) gives again a
high density contrast of 40-200 between dense molecular clumps and low
density interclump gas. A more detailed analysis of the nature of the
interclump gas and the high density clumps is found in Schneider et
al. (1996).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: September 8, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |