4.1. Modelling of C+ and CO intensities
Fig. 7a and b show C+ versus CO intensity, plotted on a logarithmic scale, embedded in a parameter space of density and UV flux, calculated by a model of Köster et al. (1994). In this model, a molecular cloud is exposed to isotropic UV radiation from two sides, thus giving a realistic approximation to the emission from clumps with finite size. The chemical structure and the gas temperature at one location depend on the distance to the surfaces and on the conditions within the cloud so that the line intensities are calculated iteratively, using an `Escape Probability' formalism and incorporating the 13CO chemistry. The free parameters of the model are the line width, the incident UV field and the extinction.
The H2-column density of the individual clumps in the RMC reaches values up to 101021 cm-2 (obtained with IRAM CO data, Schneider 1995) so that we give model results for a visual extinction of Av=10m and Av=5m. In general, the datapoints cover a regime of low incident UV flux () and medium to high density (103 to 105 cm-3) in both model fits (Av=5m and 10m). The highest intensities of both tracers are found at the position of the IR source IR06314+0427. According to the PDR model, the densities are 104-105 cm-3 and the UV flux 100 to a few . The high UV flux is provided by a small association of OB stars (see 3). The C+ and CO intensities from the HII region/molecular cloud interface and the cloud core indicate lower densities (103 to 104 cm-3) and a lower UV flux (a few to a few 100 ). The CO intensity shows little positional variation whereas the C+ intensity decreases a factor 10 from the interface region into the cloud core.
The datapoints are shifted to higher densities and UV flux if the beam filling factors ( and ) are lower than 1, which is likely because the higher resolution CO observations with IRAM reveal substructure. The two arrows indicate filling factors (=) of 0.3 and 0.7 and demonstrate how the datapoints are shifted. In particular, a small filling factor for the CO data easily shifts the datapoints into a higher density regime whereas a small factor for the C+ data only slightly shifts the datapoints into a higher UV field regime.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: September 8, 1998