 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 338, 273-291 (1998)
3. Numerical simulations
To obtain a more realistic picture of wind bow shocks produced by
fast moving OB stars, we have performed two-dimensional hydrodynamical
simulations of the gas flow towards a star with a strong stellar wind.
The simulations have been carried out with a somewhat improved version
of the hydrodynamical code used by Comerón (1997) to model the
expansion of H II regions taking into account the
presence of a stellar wind and a density discontinuity in the
surrounding medium. The code explicitly solves the Eulerian
hydrodynamical equations in a computational grid representing an axial
plane of a cylindrical coordinate system, with symmetry around the
axis. The matter, energy, and momentum densities are defined at the
center of each computational cell, and evolved with time according to
the hydrodynamical equations, schematically written as
![[EQUATION]](img92.gif)
where w is any of the physical variables characterizing the
fluid, and A and B are coefficients containing
combinations of those physical variables and their spatial
derivatives. In each computational step, and
are treated as constants, so that after a time
increase
![[EQUATION]](img96.gif)
As a refinement of the method used by Comerón (1997), the
evolution of is actually calculated in two
steps: in the first one, a first set of values of
, is calculated for each
variable w, and provisional values of
are found using Eq. (25). These values are used to compute a new set
of , , and finally the
definitive are calculated with Eq. (25), now
using the average of the first and second set of
, values. This procedure
provides a second-order accuracy, and practically eliminates some
small-amplitude oscillations occasionally appearing near the axis of
symmetry in the first-order approach (see, e.g., the comparison
between the first and second order approximations in
Rózyczka 1985). We note, however, that the
use of the approximation given by Eq. (25) already results in a higher
accuracy than a simple finite differences approach.
The hydrodynamical equations are written in a form adequate for the
assumption that the matter and momentum densities vary linearly from
cell to cell. The spatial derivatives of the internal energy density
are assumed to have a form that naturally introduces a Von
Neumann-Richtmyer artificial-viscosity term in the momentum and energy
equations, as explained in Comerón (1997). Non-hydrodynamic
heating and cooling are not included in the internal energy equation
(cf. Eq. (24)). Instead, after evolving the physical quantities over
using Eq. (25), the matter and energy densities
at each point are used to calculate the rates of heating and cooling
due to radiative losses, heating proportional to the density (such as
cosmic ray heating), and photoionization. Also calculated is the rate
transfer of energy by thermal conduction between each cell and its
neighbours. All these contributions are added together and multiplied
by , and a new value of the energy density at
each cell is calculated. With this new value, we recalculate the net
variation of the energy density due to these processes. If its sign is
found to be different from the one calculated in the first place, the
energy density is simply replaced by its thermal equilibrium value.
The reader is referred to Comerón (1997) for a more detailed
explanation of the numerical methods summarized here, as well as for a
description of the physical ingredients of the model of the
interstellar medium. Finally, radiative transfer is not explicitly
calculated; we simply assume that the ionizing flux from the star at
each point is sufficient to keep hydrogen completely ionized. This is
justified if the flux exceeds the value given by the right-hand side
of condition (21).
We have used a grid of cells in our
simulations. We set the scale of the grid by taking its side to be 4
times the standoff distance , given by Eq. (1).
With the resulting resolution, the densest, thinnest parts of the bow
shock are always well resolved by the grid, an essential condition for
the proper treatment of instabilities. For some selected cases, we
produced higher resolution simulations using a
grid which yielded the same results regarding structure and stability
of the bow shock, what makes us confident that the resolution used
here is sufficient for our purposes. The reference frame is chosen to
be moving with the star, which is placed at the axis of symmetry. The
ambient medium flows parallel to this axis towards the star, which is
placed at a convenient distance from the center of the grid. This
distance is chosen such that the obvious constraint that the head of
the bow shock never overflows the computational grid, is satisfied;
most of the simulations presented here have the star placed at 3 times
the distance from the edge of the grid. The
stellar wind is assumed to flow freely within a radius of 10
computational cells from the star. This is a valid boundary condition,
as the freely flowing wind actually reaches distances from the star
exceeding the size of these 10 cells by far. The gas is allowed to
flow out of the grid through its sides, with the exception of the side
where the ambient medium "enters" the computational grid.
3.1. Choice of initial parameters
A number of simulations have been carried out in the present study,
each one characterized by a set of initial conditions and by the
ingredients considered in tracking the thermal evolution of the gas.
The basic parameters of each simulation are summarized in
Table 1. Given the allowed wide range in each of these
parameters, we have opted for choosing a fiducial set representative
of the "typical" characteristics of an OB runaway star moving in a
diffuse medium (the reference case A in Table 1). The other five
cases are then defined in order to focus on the effects that some
changes have on the structure of the bow shock. Finally, the last two
cases are chosen to illustrate the effects of the gas physics on the
macroscopic structure of the bow shock. The first six cases considered
here include both a finite cooling time and thermal conduction. Case G
assumes a constant gas temperature of 8,500 K (equivalent to the
instantaneous cooling case discussed in Sect. 2), and in case H we
have excluded energy transfer by thermal conduction, corresponding to
the physics in the Raga et al. 1997 model. Note that, due to the
procedure used to select the cell size described in the previous
paragraph, the computational grids correspond to widely different
physical areas, as noted in the sixth column of Table 1.
![[TABLE]](img103.gif)
Table 1. Characteristics of the simulations.
Note: The column "gas physics" refers to the treatment of cooling in the simulations:
a: both thermal conduction and finite cooling time have been included in the simulations.
b: the gas has been treated as isothermal.
c: finite cooling time considered, but thermal conduction not included in the simulation.
In all the models whose evolution is followed here, the simulation
starts with the star surrounded by a small expanding shell having a
radius of . The expansion velocity is given by
the well-known expansion law of a thin shell powered by the thermal
pressure of a shocked stellar wind (e.g. Weaver et al. 1977). At this
stage, the expansion velocity is much greater than
, and the shell expands nearly isotropically. The
dependence on a particular set of initial conditions quickly vanishes
as the front part of the shell approaches .
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: September 8, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |