Astron. Astrophys. 338, 465-478 (1998)
3. Optical variability
3.1. Long term variability
During the observed time span RX J0203 was found to display changes
of the overall brightness level, as it is demonstrated in Fig. 2,
where all available V-band magnitudes are compiled. For most
occasions (1992, 1993, Dec. 1996 and 1997) the system was in a high
state with a mean brightness V reaching
![[FORMULA]](img4.gif) . It's magnitude was
significantly lower by about 1 mag during
the intermediate state observed between Oct. 1995 and Feb. 1996,
whereas for the single observed low state observation (Sep. 1994)
it dropped to .
![[FIGURE]](img34.gif) |
Fig. 2.
Long term V-band light curve of RX J0203 . The vertical bars indicate the orbital variability for each observation.
|
A representative set of orbital V-band light curves
corresponding to the different brightness levels described above is
displayed in Fig. 3. The original data were folded over the
photometric ephemeris derived below. The most obvious feature of the
high states observed in 1993, 1996 and 1997 is a quasi-sinusoidal
variation with a period of 4.6 hours. The full
range of the orbital variation is 0.7 - 0.9 mag. A similar light curve
pattern was observed in the intermediate brightness state
Oct. 1995 - Feb. 1996. We refer to this brightness variation
as regular mode.
![[FIGURE]](img36.gif) |
Fig. 3.
V band light curves as a function of the photometric phase. Some data were plotted twice for clarity (open circles). Typical photometric errors are 0.05 mag.
|
It is in drastic contrast to the light curve pattern observed in
another high state in Oct. - Nov. 1992 (Fig. 4). The
V-band light curve of Oct. 29, 1992 appeared asymmetric
with a steep rise and a shallow decline. The orbital minimum was
shifted to a later phase, , with respect to the
finally accepted photometric ephemeris of that feature. The
R-band light curves of Nov. 24 - 27, 1992 were double
humped with the main minimum at being very
sharp. These changes are most likely explained by changes of the
shape, the size and(or) the location of the accretion region. We refer
to this brightness variation as irregular mode.
![[FIGURE]](img40.gif) |
Fig. 4.
Differential RV band light curves obtained in October/November 1992 as a function of the photometric phase. Some data were plotted twice for clarity (open circles). The light curves are shifted by 0, 1.25, and 2.5 mag, respectively.
|
The low state light curve (Fig. 3, lower curve) is almost
flat with strong flares ( mag) superimposed. Any
remaining orbital variation was lower than 0.25 mag.
3.2. The photometric period
The stable photometric pattern found in the 1993 and 1995-1997 light
curves enabled us to establish a common photometric period. All data
except those obtained in the low state or in the irregular mode of
accretion entered our period search. We used two different approches
for the period analysis. The first is a simple least-squares method
(see Schwope et al. 1991) applied to the heliocentric timings of all
observed minima. These were estimated by fitting gaussians to the
light curves and are listed in Table 2. The quantity which
determines the significance of a period is the inverted squared sum of
the values (observed minus calculated). This
was computed from the phasing of the minima for each trial period. The
second is the so-called analysis-of-variance (AoV) method
(Schwarzenberg-Cerny 1989) which is appropriate for non-uniformly
distributed observations and makes use of every single data-point by
folding and binning with a trial period.
![[TABLE]](img44.gif)
Table 2. Heliocentric timings of the photometric minima a) Errors resulting from gaussian fit
Both methods yield consistently a most probable period of
(Fig. 5a-c). All other periods, in
particular the one-day alias period at 3.8 hours,
can be ruled out. The occurrence of alias periods in Fig. 5a-c is
caused by the typical sampling length of 1 year.
The least-squares method (panel a) is more robust than the AoV method
(panel b) in discerning the true period from the alias periods. A
weighted linear regression of all V-band minima yields the
photometric ephemeris,
![[EQUATION]](img46.gif)
where the numbers in brackets represent the
uncertainties in the last digits. The residuals of the linear fit
(observed minus calculated times of the photometric minima) are shown
in Fig. 6. Although for the period determination only the minima
in the V-band were used, minima observed in other wavelength
bands were included in the figure. (Quasi-)simultaneous
multicolour-photometry reveals clearly that the orbital minimum occurs
dependent on colour. This is nicely illustrated by the
light curves obtained in September/October 1993
(Fig. 7). The I-band minimum lags the B-band
minimum by 0.12 phase units.
![[FIGURE]](img48.gif) |
Fig. 5.
Periodograms derived from optical photometry (panel a and b ) and the radial velocity variation (panel c ). The photometric period was estimated using our least-squares method applied to the minima given in Table 2 (panel a) and the analysis-of-variance method (Schwarzenberg-Cerny 1989) for the data from 1993-1997 (panel b ). The lower panel c shows the analysis-of-variance statistic for the combined high and low resolution spectroscopy radial-velocity data. Likely periods appear as maxima. The most probable period of 16566.7 sec ( 4.6 h) is consistent with all the data.
|
![[FIGURE]](img50.gif) |
Fig. 6.
Diagram of observed minus calculated times of photometric minima computed with respect to the linear ephemeris of Eq. 1. Filters used for some observations are indicated.
|
![[FIGURE]](img52.gif) |
Fig. 7.
Differential light curves obtained in September/October 1993 showing quasi-periodic oscillations plotted as a function of the photometric phase. Some data were plotted twice for clarity (open circles). The light curves are shifted by 0, 1, 2, and 3 mag respectively.
|
Apart from the colour-dependence of the minima there is some
remaining phase jitter in the V and R band minima in
excess of the formal errors. The latter might be underestimated
regarding the variable shape of the individual light curve minima.
The absence of a flat-bottomed part of the optical light curves in
the regular mode of accretion and their close resemblance to other
polars like e.g. MR Ser (Schwope et al. 1991) suggest that
the light curves are modulated by cyclotron beaming. With that type of
light curve the accretion region is continously in view and in
particular undergoes no selfeclipse by the white dwarf. The
colour-dependent minima may probably be explained by optical depth
effects in a structured accretion region.
3.3. Optical quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs)
Several of our light curves obtained during the 1993 high state
display rapid QPO-type variations (Fig. 7). All observations
obtained in August and September display this behaviour. The QPO
variability is dependent in strength on phase and photometric
bandpass. They were generally strongest around phase
and in the U-band (0.4 mag
peak-to-peak), and generally weakest around phase
and in the I-band. From Fourier analysis
we found two distinctive types of QPO-periodicities, one group occurs
at min, a second group has
min.
Low frequency oscillations in AM Herculis objects are reported for
half a dozen systems both at X-ray and optical wavelengths (Chanmugam
1995). A model to explain these was proposed by King (1989) and
involves oscillations of the ionization front near the
-point. The periodicities predicted by this
model are 0.055 equivalent
to 13.7 min for RX J0203. Our measurement of 14
min is in good agreement with that prediction. We note that RX J0203
occasionally displays QPOs at half that period which might represent
the first harmonic. A similar behaviour, QPO-type variations at two
periodicities being multiples of each other, has been found in AM Her,
VV Pup (Schaefer et al. 1994) and V1309 Ori (Shafter et
al. 1995), but RX J0203 is the only system showing both
periodicities simultaneously.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: September 14, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |