Astron. Astrophys. 338, 819-839 (1998)
3. N tilted corotating rings
The generalization of Eq. (40) gives the Lagrangian for an N
ring system as
![[EQUATION]](img516.gif)
The Hamiltonian,
![[EQUATION]](img517.gif)
is
![[EQUATION]](img518.gif)
Because the are non-negative, all of the
terms in are non-negative if
which is the case for oblate halo. Thus the
ring system with is
stable in the presence of dissipative forces. The total canonical
angular momentum is
![[EQUATION]](img521.gif)
In the absence of dissipation and
are constants of the motion.
As in the case of one or two rings, it is useful to let
![[EQUATION]](img524.gif)
The equations of motion can then be written as
![[EQUATION]](img525.gif)
with , where the
generalize of Eq. (34).
As discussed in Sect. 2.1, a Newtonian drag force on the ring
motion due to dynamical friction with the halo matter can be taken
into account by including the term
![[EQUATION]](img527.gif)
on the right hand side of Eq. (55). The influence of the relative
friction discussed in Sect. 2.3 can be accounted for by including the
terms
![[EQUATION]](img528.gif)
on the right hand side of Eq. (55). Here,
and with and
. With the dissipation terms (56) and (57)
included one can readily show that (see also
Sect. 4). We have not found an analogous result for
in the presence of dissipation.
We have developed and tested codes to solve Eqs. (55) (including
the terms (56) and (57)) for and 49 rings. For
the results presented here, the rings are taken to be uniformly spaced
in r with ring one at and ring N
at so that , with
in units of kpc. The ring masses
and moments of inertia
are calculated with the sum of the surface
density of the inner exponential disk and that of the neutral hydrogen
given in Sect. 2. The are calculated using
Eqs. (4), (6), and (18). The coupling coefficients
are evaluated using Eqs. (34) and (30b) and
stored. Eqs. (55) are solved as four first order equations for
and . At the same time,
an additional equation,
![[EQUATION]](img547.gif)
is also solved to give , which is the
line-of-nodes angle relative to the axis.
Comparisons of the temporal responses of 25 and 49 ring sytems for
different initial conditions show generally good agreement of the
warps for the time intervals studied. This
indicates that rings gives a valid
representation of a continuous disk. However, in contrast with a
continuous disk (HT), an ring disk has
discrete modes with separate frequencies -
N `low-frequency' modes and N `high-frequency' modes.
Fig. 15 shows the power spectrum of for a 49
ring disk-halo system which is initially given a random perturbation
with all radial wavelengths excited and no damping. The frequencies
are normalized by the angular velocity of the
inner ring . Note that
Gyr for our reference values. The frequency
differences between adjacent modes is . For
treatment of initial value problems of disk warping for time intervals
, frequency differences
less than are irrelevant. It is sufficient to
have which corresponds to
rings. This suggests
that a larger number of rings may be needed for our cases with
Gyr (Figs. 18 and 19). This will be
investigated in a future work.
![[FIGURE]](img578.gif) |
Fig. 15. The figure shows the power spectrum as a function of angular frequency of - the component tilt angle of the middle ring at kpc - for a ring disk given a random initial perturbation. The frequency is normalized by the angular velocity of the disk at , . The spectrum is obtained using a 1024 point FFT. The initial perturbation is taken to have a `white noise' radial wavenumber spectrum; that is, all radial wavenumber modes are excited. The are obtained using a code which solves Eqs. (55) with the rings equally spaced between kpc and kpc. Dissipation is neglected ( ). The mass of the inner disk in Eq. (4) is , and the disk radial scale is kpc. The halo potential is given by Eq. (6a) with ellipticity , core radius kpc, and circular velocity km/s. The neutral hydrogen has a total mass of and is distributed according to Eq. (5) with kpc. For these parameters, the magnitude of the single ring precession frequency decreases strongly with for the range 10-20 kpc where it is due mainly to the inner disk. For in the range 20-40 kpc, is due mainly to the halo, and it decreases gradually with . The separation between low and high frequency modes is roughly at The lowest frequency of the spectrum is while the next two higher frequencies are at and 0.0639. Note that the limiting value of from the generalization of Eq. (47) is which is significantly larger in magnitude than the observed.
|
The lowest frequency mode of the power spectrum,
in Fig. 15 (see also Sect. 2.3 and Sect. 2.5),
remains discrete (that is, isolated) as because
our disk model has a sharp outer edge so that
is integrable (HT). Power spectra obtained for cases with
show that increases
with much more slowly than the higher
frequency modes which is consistent with the behavior observed in
Figs. 6 and 12. For the conditions of Fig. 15, the magnitude
is considerably smaller than that predicted
for the limit of strong self-gravity between the rings where
[equation(47)]. In any case, the frequency
is so small (the corresponding period is
Gyr) that it is irrelevant to the initial
value problems considered below.
In the following four subsections we consider different possible
origins of warps in an otherwise flat galaxy. Sect. 3.1 discusses warp
excitation by a passing compact satellite; Sect. 3.2 treats warp
excitation by a compact sinking satellite; Sect. 3.3 treats the case
of a tilted halo potential. Sect. 3.4 considers the tilt evolution for
the case where the initial plane of the disk material is tilted.
3.1. Warp excitation by a passing satellite
Consider the excitation of a warp in a galaxy due to the passage of
a satellite of mass much less than the
galaxy's mass. The satellite's orbit can
easily be calculated exactly for , neglecting
the back reaction of the perturbed galaxy on the satellite. However,
we assume that even at closest approach the satellite is far from the
center of the galaxy and therefore calculate the orbit in the halo
potential, Eq. (6a), with the ellipticity of the halo neglected for
simplicity ( ). At the closest approach at
, the satellite's speed is
, and the angle between the satellite and the
plane is . Also, at
closest approach, the satellite is taken to be at
and . We consider both
prograde and retrograde satellite passages.
In the presence of a satellite of finite mass
, the description of the galaxy disk in terms
of tilted circular rings breaks down. The centers of the rings are
shifted from the origin, and the rings become non-circular. For this
reason we consider the response of the galaxy to a `symmetrized'
perturbation of a satellite obtained by replacing the actual satellite
by two satellites, each of equal mass , with
one satellite in the orbit described above and
the other in the orbit . With this prescription
we then calculate the torque of the satellites on each ring as a
function of time,
![[EQUATION]](img596.gif)
where , with given
by Eq. (8a), is the position vector to a point on the jth ring,
and runs over the different rings. Here,
is the gravitational potential of the
satellite and a is its characteristic radius. To obtain the
warp response of the galaxy we evaluate Eqs. (59) numerically for
and include the complex torques
on the right hand sides of Eqs. (55).
Fig. 16a shows the Briggs plot of the warp response
of the galaxy resulting from the retrograde
passage of a satellite of mass . Note that the
dependence of at the times shown is of the
form of a leading spiral wave and that it is qualitatively
similar to the leading spiral waves observed in many warped galaxies
(Briggs 1990). Note also that the form of the spiral wave is preserved
for a long time. However, the amplitude of the warp
is significantly smaller than the warps
observed in many cases, and this agrees with the conclusions of HT.
Nevertheless, it is of interest to understand the behavior.
Fig. 16b shows the warp response for the retrograde case with and
without gravitational interactions ( ) between
the rings. Clearly these interactions give a strong phase-locking of
the inner rings of the disk (roughly, to
or 10 to 18 kpc) which have the same
as a function of time. The phase-locking of
two and three rings was disscussed in Sect. 2.2 and Sect. 2.4.
![[FIGURE]](img607.gif) |
Fig. 16. The top panel a shows a polar plot (a Briggs plot) of the tilt angle of the disk in degrees as a function of the angle of the line-of-nodes for the case of a retrograde passage of a compact satellite for times and 3 Gyr after the time of closest approach. The plot shows a leading spiral wave qualitatively of the form observed, but with a relatively small amplitude compared with many observed warps (Briggs 1990). - The bottom panel b shows a comparison of the disk response with and without gravitational interaction ( ) between the rings. This figure shows the locking of the phase in the inner part of the disk.
|
The results shown in Fig. 16 are obtained from a code which solves
Eqs. (55) including the torques of Eq. (59) with
rings equally spaced between
kpc and kpc. Thus the
separation between rings is kpc. The torques
are evaluated numerically at each time step. The Newtonian drag is
neglected, in Eq. (56). A small relative
friction is included, in Eq. (57). [For a disk
half-thickness pc and sound speed
km/s, this corresponds
to a value of Shakura's (1973) viscosity parameter
. This friction acts to smooth out sharp
`corners' which exist in the curve
. Owing to this ,
decreases by 16% between
and 3 Gyr.] The mass of the satellite is
, its core radius is
kpc, and at closest approach it is at a
distance kpc where it has a speed of 400 km/s
and is located at an angle above the
plane. The mass of the inner disk in Eq. (4)
is , and the disk radial scale is
kpc. The halo potential is given by Eq. (6a)
with ellipticity , core radius
kpc, and circular velocity
km/s so that for
. The mass of halo matter inside of
kpc is . The neutral
hydrogen has a total mass of and is
distributed according to Eq. (5) with kpc.
Fig. 17a shows the Briggs plot for the warp resulting from the
prograde passage of the satellite. For early times
( Gyr) the form of is a
trailing spiral wave which is distinctly different from that
for the retrograde passage at a similar time. The amplitude of the
warp is noticably larger than for the retrograde case but still
smaller than many observed warps. For later times
( Gyr) the trailing wave `unwraps,' evolving
into a leading spiral wave of form similar to that for the retrograde
passage for radial distances out to about 35 kpc. For larger r,
the curve has a `spur' where
increase with r while
remains roughly constant (see Sect. 3.2). This
unwrapping appears to be due to the phase-mixing of the fast
precession modes which propagate over the radial extent of the disk in
times less than 4 Gyr.
![[FIGURE]](img639.gif) |
Fig. 17. The top panel a shows a polar plot of the tilt angle of the disk in degrees as a function of the angle of the line-of-nodes for the case of a prograde passage of a compact satellite at times and Gyr after the time of closest approach. The other conditions are the same as given in the caption to Fig. 16. The plot shows that initially ( Gyr) a trailing spiral wave is formed. Later, ( Gyr) the trailing wave `unwraps' and gives rise to a leading spiral wave. Analysis of the evolution of the tilt excited by the prograde satellite shows that it is initially a fast outward propagating wave with radial phase velocity km/s and radial wavelength kpc for kpc. Roughly, . - The bottom panel b shows a comparison of the orbits (in degrees) of ring No. 25 at radius kpc for 0-1 Gyr for the cases of retrograde and prograde satellite encounters for the conditions of Figs. 15a and 16a. The circles and squares are equally spaced at 0.1 Gyr intervals. The (i) indicates and the ( s) correspond to Gyr. For the retrograde case, mainly the slow precession mode of the ring is excited, whereas for the prograde case mainly the fast precession mode is initially excited.
|
The different behavior of the prograde and retrograde cases for
early times ( Gyr) can be understood by
considering the response of a single ring with or without
gravitational interactions between rings. Fig. 17b shows the orbits
of ring No. 25 (radius
kpc) including the gravitational interactions
for prograde and retrograde encounters. Consider the torque on the
ring which enters on the
right hand side of Eq. (55). The tilting of the ring during the
encounter is relatively small and can be neglected for this
discussion. Consequently, is an even function
of t if the pericenter is taken as .
Further, is the same for prograde and
retrograde encounters. For the considered geometry of the satellite
orbit, , and the magnitude of
decreases monotonically with increasing
. On the other hand, the
torque , although smaller
in magnitude, is an odd function of time, and it has opposite signs
for prograde and retrograde encounters. Very roughly
for the prograde case whereas
for the retrograde case. As a function of
time, traces out a closed clockwise
path in the complex plane for the prograde case, whereas this path is
counterclockwise for the retrograde case. For the prograde
case, the path of is in the same clockwise
sense as the path of the orbit for the
fast precession mode (see Sect. 2.1), whereas for the
retrograde case the path of is in the same
direction of motion as for the slow
precession mode. For this reason a prograde encounter couples strongly
to the fast precession mode, whereas a retrograde encounter couples
mainly to the slow precession mode.
3.2. Warp excitation by a sinking satellite
Here, we discuss the behavior of warps excited by a slowly sinking
compact minor satellite. The satellite is assumed to be minor in the
respect that its mass is much smaller than that of the galaxy plus
halo matter within say 30 kpc. The sinking of a more massive satellite
is likely to cause substantial thickening of the disk (Walker, Mihos,
and Hernquist 1996) which is not observed. Initially, the satellite is
assumed to be in an approximately circular bound orbit in the halo
gravitational potential at a large radius in
the plane at an ange
above the plane. The satellite slowly sinks
owing to dynamical friction with the halo matter [Eq. (6a) with
] which in the simplest description (BT, p. 428)
causes the specific angular momentum of the satellite
to decrease as
![[EQUATION]](img654.gif)
where is the Coulomb logarithm. The time
for the satellite to sink from to the galaxy's
center is
![[EQUATION]](img656.gif)
where we have taken . The disk response is
found by integrating Eqs. (55) including the numerically evaluated
torques (59) for at each time step for a
`symmetrized' sinking analogous to the approach discussed in Sect.
3.1.
Fig. 18 shows the Briggs plots of the warp response
of the galaxy at different times after the
sinking ( ) of a satellite of mass
in retrograde and prograde orbits. A number of
points are observed:
![[FIGURE]](img667.gif) |
Fig. 18. The top panel a shows a polar plot of the tilt angle of the disk in degrees as a function of the angle of the line-of-nodes for the case of a retrograde sinking of a compact minor satellite of mass at times and Gyr after the sinking ( ). Initially, the rings are unperturbed and the satellite is `turned on' at a distance kpc in the plane above the plane. The in-spiral of the satellite is described by Eq. (60a) with The other conditions are the same as described in the caption of Fig. 16 except that the relative friction is larger, . The Newtonian drag is neglected. This value of has the effect of damping out short radial wavelength features of the tilt while not appreciably changing the overall curve. - The bottom panel b shows the Briggs plot for a prograde sinking for conditions otherwise the same as in a above.
|
(1) The warp amplitudes are larger than for the passing
satellite (of mass ) discussed in Sect. 3.1,
but the amplitudes are still smaller than some observed warps (Briggs
1990).
(2) Coiling in the curves at early
times ( Gyr) tends to disappear at later times
( Gyr). We believe but have not proven that
this is due to the phase-mixing of the fast precession modes which
propagate over the radial extent of the disk in times
Gyr (see also Sect. 3.1).
(3) For both the retrograde and prograde cases
exhibits a leading spiral wave for
Gyr qualitatively of the form observed for
M 83 (see Fig. 2c). However, the tilt amplitude
is significantly smaller than that for M 83.
The dissipative torques due to dynamical friction [Eq. (56)] and
that due to relative friction [Eq. (57)] have different consequences
for the warp evolution. For a dynamical friction coefficient
, the warp amplitudes
for the cases of Figs. 18a and 18b are reduced by factors
while the line-of-nodes angles are roughly the
same. On the other hand, for relative friction coefficients
, short radial wavelengths are damped out
without appreciably affecting the overall shape of the
curves.
3.3. Tilted halo potential
Dekel and Shlosman (1983) and Toomre (1983) proposed that observed
warps of galaxies may result from the fact that the dark matter halo
is oblate and is rigidly tilted with respect to the inner disk. To
consider this possibility we generalize Eq. (55) to the case of
N tilted rings in a halo potential which is rigidly tilted by
an angle, say, (with )
with respect to the axis of the inner disk. We
find
![[EQUATION]](img678.gif)
where and . The
damping terms are still given by Eqs. (56) and (57).
For a special disk tilt, , the
right-hand-side of Eq. (61) is zero so that is
time-independent. This corresponds to the
Laplacian surface of the disk (BT, p. 413). It is given by
![[EQUATION]](img683.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img684.gif)
where is the Kronecker delta and the prime
on the summation means that the diagonal terms are omitted. The
damping terms (56) and (57) are of course zero for the Laplacian tilt.
If the self-gravity of the rings ( ) is
negligible, . Eq. (62) can always be inverted
to give if . This is
because the ring system is stable for
(see discussion following Eq. (53b)) which
implies .
A general solution of Eq. (61) can evidently be written as
, where obeys Eq. (55)
which has no reference to the halo tilt. Over a sufficiently long
period of time, damping given by Eq. (56) and/or (57) will give
as discussed in the paragraph after next.
Fig. 19a shows the Laplacian tilt for a
representative case with and without the self-gravity of the rings.
Fig. 19b shows the Briggs plots at times
and 8 Gyr for a disk started from a Laplacian
tilt and from a deviation from a Laplacian
tilt. The initial deviation is taken to be .
This deviation vanishes at and it has a
maximum at the outer edge of the disk. Dissipative torques are
neglected. This deviation from gives rise to a
leading spiral feature at the outer edge of the disk at
Gyr. For a deviation with the
factor replaced by -0.2 the line-of-nodes
angle at the outer edge of the disk ( ) at
Gyr has a similar magnitude to that in Fig.
19b, but it is negative. The Briggs plot for the Laplacian tilt is in
contrast with the leading spiral wave observed, for example, in M 83
(Figs. 1 and 2) (Briggs 1990). However, the Laplacian tilt may be
relevant to cases such as NGC 3718 which shows a relatively straight
line-of-nodes.
There is no evident reason for a disk to be initially `set up' in a
Laplacian tilt. Fig. 19b shows that deviations from the Laplacian tilt
evolve to give a line-of-nodes which is not straight. As mentioned,
dissipative torques due to dynamical friction [Eq. (56)] and/or
relative friction [equation(57)] act to damp out the deviation
( ) from the Laplacian tilt over a period of
time. For example, for in Eq. (56) and no
relative friction, the maximum line-of-nodes deviation
( ) at 8 Gyr is reduced by a factor
from the case with no dissipation shown in
Fig. 19b. On the other hand for and no
dynamical friction, the maximum line-of-nodes deviation is reduced by
a factor .
![[FIGURE]](img705.gif) |
Fig. 19. The top panel a shows the Laplacian tilt angle of the rings with and without self-gravity of the rings ( ) for the case where the halo potential [Eq. (6a)] is rigidly tilted by an angle with respect to the axis of the inner disk of the galaxy. The disk and halo are the same as in Fig. 16. The are obtained by solving Eq. (62). - The bottom panel b shows the Briggs plots for the Laplacian tilt and that for a small initial deviation from a Laplacian tilt at times and 8 Gyr.
|
3.4. Initially tilted disk plane
Here we consider the possibility that at some intial time an outer
gaseous disk is formed which is tilted with respect to the plane of
the inner disk. This situation could arise by the capture,
tidal-disruption, radial-spreading, and cooling of a low mass gas
cloud by a disk galaxy. For a spherical cloud of mass
and radius in an
approximately circular orbit of radius r, tidal breakup occurs
roughly for
, where is the circular
velocity in the flat rotation region of the galaxy [Eq. (6b)].
Treatment of the cloud disruption is beyond the scope of the present
work. Instead, we study the initial value problem where at
there is a smooth transition from an untilted
inner disk to a tilted outer disk with a straight line-of-nodes.
Specifically, we take
![[EQUATION]](img712.gif)
![[EQUATION]](img713.gif)
where is the initial tilt angle of the
outer disk. Similar behavior is found for other smooth variations of
. The smooth variation of
avoids the excitation of short radial wavelength modes.
Fig. 20 shows the nature of the warp evolution resulting from the
initial conditions (63). The spiral for
Gyr is qualitatively similar to that observed
for M 83 (see Fig. 2c). From results not shown here the similarity
continues up to Gyr after which time
and become large at the
outer edge of the disk.
![[FIGURE]](img724.gif) |
Fig. 20. The top panel a shows the radial dependence of the tilt angle for different times after the initial time ( ) when the disk tilt is give by Eqs. (63) with outer disk tilt angle . The conditions of the disk and halo are otherwise the same as for Fig. 16. - The middle panel b shows the radial dependence of the line-of-nodes . The constant value of in the inner part of the disk results from phase-locking due to the self-gravity of the rings as discussed in Sect. 2.3 and Sect. 2.5. The dashed curves correspond to least-square fits of a power law to . For Gyr, the fit gives for 23-40 kpc (with an R value of 0.96). For Gyr, the fit gives for -40 kpc (with an R value of 0.97). Note that for M 83 (Fig. 2b), the least-square fit gives . - The bottom panel c shows the Briggs plots for a sequence of times. A leading spiral wave forms, and its amplitude grows with time.
|
Fig. 21 shows a surface plot of the disk at
Gyr. A leading spiral wave appears in the
Briggs plot (panel c ), and its amplitude grows with time.
Progressively, the interior region of the disk (say,
kpc) flattens to the plane of the inner disk
while the exterior region warp amplitude grows.
The inner part of the disk maintains a straight line of nodes
( const), which is due to the self-gravity of
the disk (see Sect. 2.2, Sect. 2.4, and Sect. 3.1). The dependences
shown in Fig. 20 for -4 Gyr are
qualitatively similar to those observed for M 83 (see Fig. 2).
The outer part of the disk shows an inverse power law dependence of
the line-of-nodes on r (panel b
of Fig. 20) which is qualitatively similar to that for M 83 where
.
![[FIGURE]](img729.gif) |
Fig. 21. Surface plot of the warped disk of Fig. 20 at Gyr. To facilitate comparison with Fig. 1 for M 83, the rotation of the disk has been taken to be clockwise in this figure. The warp is a leading spiral wave the same as for M 83. The colors are in 16 steps uniformly spaced between and .
|
The dissipative torques due to dynamical friction [Eq. (56)] and
that due to relative friction [Eq. (57)] affect the results of Fig. 20
in different ways. For a dynamical friction coefficient
, and no relative friction, the maximum warp
amplitude at Gyr is reduced by about
. On the other hand, for no dynamical friction,
but a relative friction coefficient , the warp
at Gyr is essentially unchanged.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: September 17, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |