 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 339, 525-530 (1998)
4. Shock wave origins
As said in the previous section, the maximum extension of the
atmosphere occurs at . After this phase, the
layers start their infalling motion due to gravity. In the absence of
opposite forces (small density gradients or radiation pressure), the
atmosphere would be continuously accelerated. This is in accordance
with the motion of the red core component during the largest
discontinuity, which can be represented by a straight line (Fig. 2a).
In this case, the slope of this line (about 29 m.s-2)
should approximately corresponds to the gravity of the star. As for
the blue component, the associated deceleration is much lower, being
around 20 m.s-2. Therefore, there is a mechanism which
stops the free fall motion. Indeed, when the bottom of the layer is
falling, it encounters the deepest photospheric layers which are
denser. Consequently, a strong pressure gradient develops between the
bottom and the top of the line formation region. This gradient becomes
so large ( ) that the induced compression wave
front breakes into a shock wave. Indeed, at this phase, the line
doubling shows that there exist two distinct velocity fields, for
which the velocity difference is directly related to the shock
amplitude. As shown on Figs. 1, 3 and 4, the post-shock velocity is
negative. Therefore, for the observer, (Eulerian coordinates), the
shock is falling down. Thus, the Eulerian velocity of this receding
front is smaller than that of the layers.
This is shown by comparing the velocity related to both
H and Si iii line formation regions. Fig. 6
represents the heliocentric radial velocity curve associated to Si iii
as a function of that associated to the H
line.
![[FIGURE]](img36.gif) |
Fig. 6. The radial velocity of Si iii is represented versus that of H for the night August 1st, 1994. Note that these velocities are associated to the blue component for both lines. Black dots represent the ascending branch of the heliocentric velocity curves while the open circles stand for the descending branch. The arrows indicate the way the loops are drawn (clockwise), whereas the numbers give the pulsation phase of the closest point.
|
Since loops develop in this diagram, a phase lag exists between the
considered line formation regions. Namely, as already mentioned in the
previous section, the variation of H is late
compared to that of Si iii. This Van Hoof effect is interpreted in
terms of outward propagating wave (Mathias & Gillet 1993).
Therefore, if the H line formation region is
located above that corresponding to the Si iii one, the wave
propagates outward. Thus, although the shock is falling down within
the atmospheric layers, it propagates outward in mass (Lagrangean
coordinates). This means that the shock front comes close more and
more to the H layer during the infalling motion
of the atmosphere. This shock, which will be called the "infalling
shock", desappears before the end of the ballistic motion of the
atmosphere, depending of its intensity.
Then, a rapid expansion phase takes place during the second
velocity discontinuity. Shortly before this phase, the atmosphere is
nearly at rest. Suddenly, the profile becomes strongly distorted.
Despite no visible line doubling, the line shows a well marked
asymmetry. This infers that a shock wave, originating from the
subphotospheric regions, sweeps the layer outward such as in the
classical Schwarzschild (1954) mechanism. This wave is likely caused
by the iron opacity -mechanism which has been
recently shown as the true engine of the pulsation of
Cephei stars. Note that, as for the infalling
shock, the Van Hoof effect is also detected here and have the same
interpretation.
Thus, the first discontinuity and the associated infalling shock
would be a consequence of the wave induced by the
-mechanism. This second shock will be called the
"outward-shock". We could not determine any appreciable differences
between the velocity separation between the two components for both
lines considered, implying that the shock energy, in the framework of
the precision of our data, remains almost constant during its
propagation from Si iii to H layers.
Having this scenario in mind, it is now interesting to consider the
stillstand. Indeed, if the upper atmosphere was completely stopped by
the denser bottom layers and before the arrival of the outward shock,
the stillstand would be at the systemic velocity of the star. However,
it is well known that the stillstand is variable in shape (Odgers
1955). Our data show for the two considered nights, that, immediatly
after the infalling-shock, from the beginning of the stillstand, the
velocity is slightly below the -axis, which
represents an expansion phase (Figs. 2a and b and 5a and b). This can
be interpreted as a bounce on the photospheric layers. From both
figures, the larger the intensity of the infalling-shock, the larger
the bounce. Then, because gravity acts, the atmosphere slows down and
then falls back toward the photosphere, as shown by the velocity value
above the -axis. This is well shown by the small
and continuous decrease of the velocity during the 3/4 of the
stillstand phase. In this view, the stillstand can be considered as
the final damping step of the infalling atmospheric motion. Its
variable shape is the consequence of different amplitudes of the
ballistic motion which must changes from cycle to cycle. Indeed, as
noted in the previous section, although the above scenario is valid
for both studied nights, the line profiles and the velocity curves do
not present the same pattern. This may be due to a different intensity
of the successive shocks.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: October 21, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |