 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 339, 623-628 (1998)
4. Hubble constant without projection effects
Here, we consider the possibility of deriving the Hubble constant
in a meaningful manner without any biases due to cluster projections.
It has been suggested in literature that observations of a large
sample of galaxy clusters can be used to average out the dependence on
the scale factor Z and to produce the true value of the Hubble
constant, which we define as from individual
Hubble constant measurements, , in a large
sample of clusters. We investigate the possibility of such an
averaging by considering the different projections of clusters at
different inclination angles. Assuming the previously described
ellipsoidal shape and the effect of the scale factor Z in the
Hubble constant, we can over the all possible inclination angles
and the ratio to derive
the expected average value of the Hubble constant
:
![[EQUATION]](img62.gif)
if all clusters are prolate, and
![[EQUATION]](img63.gif)
if all clusters are oblate. Here . When all
clusters are prolate and that the semi-major axis used to calculate
the Hubble constant, then the distribution has a mean of
. However, if the semi-minor axis is used, then
the average Hubble constant is underestimated from the true value by
about 10%, assuming that the mean
is 0.7 for prolate clusters. If all clusters
are oblate, and the semi-major axis is used to derive the Hubble
constant, then the mean of the distribution overestimates the true
value of the Hubble constant by as much as 20%,
if the mean is 1.5 for oblate clusters. For
oblate clusters, the true value of the Hubble constant can be obtained
when the semi-minor axis is used. However, in both oblate and prolate
cases, the distribution has a large scatter requiring a large sample
of galaxy clusters to derive a reliable value of the Hubble constant.
A similar calculation can also be performed for the gas mass fraction
to estimate the nature of the value derived by averaging out a gas
mass fraction measurements for a large sample of clusters. Here again,
a similar offset as in the Hubble constant is present, and
measurements of gas mass fraction in a large sample of clusters are
needed to put reliable limits on the cosmological parameters,
especially the mass density of the universe based on cosmological
baryon density (e.g., Evrard 1997).
So far, we have only considered the SZ and X-ray observations of
galaxy clusters. By combining weak lensing observations towards galaxy
clusters, we show that it may be possible to derive a reliable value
of the Hubble constant based on observations of a single cluster. The
gravitational lensing observations of galaxy clusters measure the
total mass along the line of sight through the cluster. The SZ effect
measures the gas mass along the line of sight, and thus, the ratio of
SZ gas mass to gravitational lensing total mass should yield a
measurement of the gas mass fraction independent of cluster shape
assumptions and asphericity. Here, we assume that the cluster gas
distribution exactly traces the cluster gravitational potential due to
dark matter, and that these two measurements are affected equally by
cluster shape. This is a reasonable assumption, but however, it is
likely that gas distribution does not follow the dark matter
potential, and that there may be some dependence on the cluster shape
between the two quantities. For now, assuming that the gas mass
fraction from SZ and gravitational lensing is not affected by cluster
projection, we outline a method to estimate the Hubble constant
independent of the scale factor Z. The gas mass fraction based
on SZ and lensing is , while the gas mass
fraction based on X-ray emission gas mass and the total mass based on
X-ray temperature is . Since the two gas mass
fraction measurements are expected to be the same, then one can solve
for a combination of h and Z. However to break the
degeneracy between h and Z an additional observation or
an assumption is needed. In general, there are large number of
clusters with X-ray measurements and X-ray based gas mass fraction
measurements. By averaging out the gas mass fraction for such a large
sample of clusters, we can estimate the universal gas mass fraction
value for clusters, e.g. (Evrard 1997; Cooray
1998). If assumed that this gas fraction is valid for the cluster for
which SZ and weak lensing observations are available, we can then
calculate the Hubble constant.
We applied this to SZ, X-ray and weak lensing observations of
galaxy cluster A2163. The SZ observations of A2163 are presented in
Holzapfel et al. (1997), while weak lensing and X-ray observations are
presented in Squires et al. (1996). The SZ effect towards A2163 can be
described with a y ( ) parameter of
, which includes various uncertainties described
in Holzapfel et al. (1997). The weak lensing observations of A2163 has
been used to derive the total cluster mass in Squires et al. (1996),
and the lensing observations are most sensitive out to a radius of
200" (0.423 h-1 Mpc) from the
cluster center, where the total mass is
. Using the cluster model
( and ) in Holzapfel et
al. (1997), we integrated the SZ temperature change to this radius
from cluster center along the line of sight to derive a gas mass of
.
This represents the gas mass within the cylindrical cut across the
cluster, and effectively probes the same region as the weak lensing
observations. The gas mass fraction based on the SZ effect and the
weak lensing total mass is . When this gas mass
is compared to the effective gas mass fraction of clusters,
(Evrard 1997; Cooray 1998), we obtain
. We have slightly overestimated the error in
the average gas mass fraction to take into account the fact that this
fraction is measured at the outer hydrostatic radius
( 1 Mpc), and may not correspond to the value at
the observed radius of A2163. In Squires et al. (1997), the gas mass
fraction was measured to be for A2163, which is
in agreement with our universal value, but the value in Squires et al.
(1997) may be subjected to a scaling factor. The combined SZ/lensing
gas mass fraction and the average gas mass fraction for clusters
result in a Hubble constant of km
s-1 Mpc-1. Given that we used data from 2
different papers in deriving this Hubble constant, it is likely that
this value may be subjected to unknown systematic effects between the
two studies. We strongly recommend that a careful analysis of cluster
data be carried out to derive the Hubble constant based on SZ, X-ray
and weak lensing observations. In addition, total virial masses from
velocity dispersion analysis should also be considered in such an
analysis to constrain the cluster shape. It is likely that much
stronger and reliable result may be obtained through this method,
instead of just SZ and X-ray observations. In Holzapfel et al. (1997),
the Hubble constant was derived to be 60 km
s-1 Mpc-1 for an isothermal temperature model
and 78 km s-1 Mpc-1 for a
hybrid temperature model. Our value is lower than these two values,
but is in good agreement with the average value of
based on SZ and X-ray as tabulated in Table 1,
which is in agreement with the average gas mass fraction value.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998
Online publication: October 21, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |