![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 339, 759-772 (1998) 1. IntroductionUltracompact H II regions (UCH II s)
have long been known to be the postmark of the formation of massive
stars. They are luminous, compact sources of infrared (IR) and radio
continuum radiation caused by embedded stars of While observations in the near-infrared are common and needed
because UCH II s are deeply embedded in large amounts
of dust, it is also mandatory to use as high a spatial resolution as
possible. This not only enables us to detect weak point sources
against the extended nebular emission, but also is necessary for a
precise identification of such sources with counterparts at different
wavelengths. Now that adaptive optics systems have become widely
available, it is worthwhile to make a new attempt in this direction.
This paper is intended to be the first in a series of publications of
high-resolution observations of UCH II s. The sources
in this series where selected as bright sources from the WC89 sample
with suitable (mV In addition, we are able to use this example to show that UCH II s do not necessarily form around a single young massive star, but may also accompany the formation of a whole cluster of such stars. Indeed, we are able to compare G45.45+0.06 to the most well known OB cluster in our vicinity, the Orion Trapezium and the KL/BN region (named after Kleinmann & Low 1967 and Becklin & Neugebauer 1967). In 1971, Wynn-Williams et al. made the first 6 and 11 cm aperture synthesis maps of the G45.5+0.1 complex using the Cambridge One Mile Telescope. They, and later Matthews et al. (1977), found G45.45+0.06 to be part of a cluster of three H II regions. The other two members of the cluster are G45.48+0.13 and G45.47+0.05 1. Throughout the paper we will refer to the ultracompact H II region G45.45+0.06 itself as G45, while other regions are denoted separately by their galactic coordinates. The cluster members all share a similar radial velocity of approximately 58 kms-1 (Matthews et al. 1977). We adopt a distance of 6.6 kpc for G45, which was determined by Churchwell et al. (1990) after the Brand rotation curve (Brand 1986, Brand & Blitz 1993) from NH3 measurements. Note that distance estimates for this source differ considerably in the literature but we consider direct line measurements and the Brand rotation curve the most reliable method for determining the distance. All authors resolve the near/far ambiguity to the near solution. The projected distances between the three regions range up to approximately 3 minutes of arc or 5.8 pc. Baud (1976) reported the discovery of a CO cloud coincident with the complex in both position and velocity. G45 itself was classified as a cometary UCH II by
WC89, after 6 cm VLA observations. From the measured radio flux, they
determined the region to be ionized by a zero-age-main-sequence (ZAMS)
star of spectral type O7.5. According to them, the IRAS fluxes suggest
either an O4 star as the ionization source or a cluster with an O5.5
star as the brightest member. The cometary appearance was attributed
to motion through ambient material. This motion provides at the same
time a possible containment mechanism to explain the longevity of the
ultracompact phase found for H II regions. However,
Wilner et al. (1996) (hereafter W96) showed that the cometary
structure of G45 is only a part of a larger shell structure, visible
on their 3.6 cm VLA map. The shell structure was also observed at 6 cm
by Garay et al. (1993). W96 also have detected clumps in the
surrounding cloud, traced by HCO+(1-0) emission. They
speculate about the expansion of G45 having provided the trigger for
the more recent star formation in G45.47+0.05. Since all their clumps
contain sufficient mass ( In this paper we present the result of our infrared imaging
campaign of G45. This campaign included high-resolution adaptive
optics imaging in the near-infrared (NIR, H- and
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998 Online publication: October 22, 1998 ![]() |