![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 339, L73-L76 (1998) 5. Modeling the deflector potentialThe observational parameters of this system are the image and galaxy positions (cf. Table 1), and the flux ratio of the images. For the latter it is important to realise that the continuum ratio of 4.8 (1.7 mag) differs from the emission line value because of the excess continuum component in image A, tentatively identified with microlensing by Wisotzki et al. (1993). We use the flux ratio of 2.85 obtained from the emission lines (see above), which should be much less affected by microlensing than the continuum because of the larger size of the emitting region. Table 1. Relative positions of the images and the lensing galaxy, taken from the CASTLes compilation (Kochanek et al. 1998; Lehár et al., in preparation). The directions of positive x and y are west and north, respectively. As a reference model, we use a singular isothermal sphere with
external shear (SIST). This is probably the simplest model capable to
reproduce the observed positions and the flux ratio (cf. R98). The
parameters of this model can be found in Table 2. The
observational uncertainties lead to an internal error of only 0.6 %
for the time delay. To examine the much larger possible errors due to
the modeling, we used a more general approach of models consisting of
a singular isothermal ellipsoidal mass distribution (SIEMD, see
Kassiola & Kovner 1993) with external shear. For the model-fitting
we fixed ellipticity Table 2. Parameters for the SIST and the SIEMD model: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998 Online publication: October 22, 1998 ![]() |