![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 340, 371-380 (1998) 3. The observed sample and its characteristicsThe observed QSOs were essentially chosen from the WMFH sample, which is a set of BAL and non-BAL QSOs from the Large Bright Quasar Survey (LBQS, cf. Hewett et al. 1995), augmented by several BAL QSOs from other sources. The selection was achieved during the observations depending on the QSO observability (position on the sky) and magnitude (priority to the brighter objects). A priority was also given to the BAL QSOs with low-ionization features. Five objects observable in the southern sky were added: 3 BAL QSOs from the Hartig & Baldwin (1986, hereafter HB) sample (0254-3327, 0333-3801, 2240-3702), and 2 non-BAL QSOs from the LBQS (2114-4346, 2122-4231). Finally, an additional 7 true or possible gravitationally lensed optically selected QSOs (cf. the compilation by Refsdal & Surdej 1994) were included in the sample. The final sample then consists of 42 moderate to high redshift optically selected QSOs (cf. Tables 2 & 3). It contains 29 BAL QSOs, 12 non-BAL QSOs, and 1 "intermediate" object (2211-1915, cf. WMFH). 8 of them are true or possible gravitationally lensed QSOs, including 2 BAL QSOs: 1413+1143 and 1120+0154 2. Among the 42 optically selected QSOs, 36 are definitely radio-quiet while only 1 is radio-loud (2211-1915, the "intermediate" object) (Stocke et al. 1992, Hooper et al. 1995, Véron & Véron 1996, Djorgovski & Meylan 1989, Bechtold et al. 1994, Reimers et al. 1995). The 5 remaining objects (3 BAL QSOs and 2 non-BAL QSOs: 0333-3801, 0335-3339, 2154-2005, 2114-4346, 2122-4231) have apparently not been measured at radio-wavelengths. However, they are most probably radio-quiet too (Stocke et al. 1992, Hooper et al. 1995). 3.1. The low-ionization BAL QSOsApproximately 15% of BAL QSOs have deep low-ionization BALs (Mg ii
While objects with strong low-ionization (LI) features are
recognized as LIBAL QSOs by most authors, the classification of
objects with weaker features is controversial. We therefore define
three categories of LIBAL QSOs: strong (S), weak (W), and marginal (M)
LIBAL QSOs. The strong and weak LIBAL QSOs in our sample were all
considered and first classified as such by WMFH. The strong ones are
0059-2735, 1011+0906, 1232+1325 and 1331-0108; the weak ones are
0335-3339, 1231+1320, 2225-0534 and 2350-0045 (WMFH "a" parameter
The remaining BAL QSOs are classified as high ionization (HI) only, except 0903+1734 and 1235+0857 which are unclassified, the Mg ii line being outside the observed spectral range and no Al iii BAL being detected. These classifications are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Note that most spectra available in the literature were carefully re-inspected to check for the consistency of the classification. Altogether, the strong, weak and marginal LIBAL QSOs constitute approximately 50% of our BAL QSO sample (but this is not representative of the actual proportion of LIBAL QSOs among BAL QSOs since priority was given to these objects). 3.2. The BAL QSO spectral characteristicsWMFH provide a series of spectral indices characterizing the absorption and emission features of BAL QSOs. For the absorption lines, they define the balnicity index (BI, in km s-1) which is a modified velocity equivalent width of the C iv BAL, and the detachment index (DI, unitless) which measures the onset velocity of the strongest C iv BAL trough in units of the adjacent emission line half-width, that is, the degree of detachment of the absorption line relative to the emission one (see also HB who first distinguish between detached and P Cygni-type BAL profiles). Estimates of BI are also given by Korista et al. (1993) for most objects of our sample, such that we adopt for BI an average of these values and those from WMFH. WMFH also provide "clever" half-widths at half-maximum (HW, in km s-1) and equivalent widths (EW, in Å) for the C iv, C iii] and Fe ii emission lines. For a more detailed definition of these indices, see WMFH. For a few objects (0254-3327, 0333-3801, 2240-3702, and 1120+0154), some spectral indices were not provided. We therefore computed them using C iv spectra published by Korista et al. (1993) and Steidel & Sargent (1992). The spectra were digitally scanned, and the measurements done following the prescriptions given by WMFH. The measurements were also done for spectra of objects with published indices: a good agreement was found, giving confidence in our new values. For the C iii] and Fe ii emission lines, half-widths and equivalent widths were simply rescaled from those measured by HB. All these quantities are reported in Table 3. Table 3. BAL QSO spectral characteristics In addition, we have evaluated the slope of the continuum using BAL
QSO spectra digitally scanned from the papers by WMFH, HB, and Steidel
& Sargent (1992). After some trials, we realized that some spectra
cannot be easily fitted with a single power-law continuum: the slope
often breaks roughly near C iii], probably due to reddening and/or
extended Fe ii emission (compare for example the spectra of 1246-0542
and 1442-0011 in WMFH). We therefore decided to fit the continuum
blueward and redward of C iii], independently. The derived slopes
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1998 Online publication: November 9, 1998 ![]() |