 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 341, 151-162 (1999)
4. Pulsation models for FG Vir
Since the initial discovery of multiperiodicity of FG Vir, several
studies attempted to fit the observed and theoretical frequency
spectra of the star, viz. Breger et al. (1995), Guzik, Templeton &
Bradley (1998), and Viskum et al. (1998). We will now calculate new
models utilizing the newly discovered pulsation frequencies and mode
identifications.
4.1. Method of computation
To compute models of FG Vir we used a standard stellar
evolution code which was developed in its main parts by
B. Paczy ski,
M. Koz owski and
R. Sienkiewicz (private communication). The same code was used in
our recent studies of period changes in
Scuti stars (Breger & Pamyatnykh 1998)
and in a seismological study of XX Pyx (Pamyatnykh et al. 1998).
These two papers include detailed descriptions of the model
computations, so that the present decription can be brief. For the
opacities, we used the latest version of the OPAL or the OP tables
(Iglesias & Rogers 1996 and Seaton 1996, respectively)
supplemented with the low-temperature data of Alexander & Ferguson
(1994). In all computations the OPAL equation of state was used
(Rogers et al. 1996).
The computations were performed starting with chemically uniform
models on the ZAMS, assuming typical Population I values of hydrogen
abundance, X, and heavy element abundance, Z. The
initial heavy element mixture of Grevesse & Noels (1993) was
adopted.
In some models, a possibility of overshooting from the convective
core was taken into account. The overshooting distance,
, was chosen to be , where
is the local pressure scale height at the edge
of the convective core. Examples of evolutionary tracks for
Scuti models computed with and without
overshooting are given in Breger & Pamyatnykh (1998).
In the stellar envelope the standard mixing-length theory of
convection with the mixing-length parameter =
1.0 or 2.0 was used. As we will see below, the choice of the
mixing-length parameter has only a small effect
on our models, because they are too hot to have an effective energy
transfer by convection in the stellar envelope.
In all computations we assumed uniform (solid-body) stellar
rotation and conservation of global angular momentum during evolution
from the ZAMS. These assumptions were chosen due to their simplicity.
The influence of rotation on the evolutionary tracks of
Scuti models was demonstrated by Breger
& Pamyatnykh (1998). We studied models of FG Vir with
equatorial rotational velocities from, approximately, 30 to 90 km/s
(on the ZAMS, the values are 5-10 km/s higher). This range is
consistent with the values of km/s and
found by Mantegazza et al. (1994) and an
equatorial velocity of km/s obtained by Viskum
et al. (1998). At such low rotational velocities, the evolutionary
tracks are located very close to those for non-rotating stellar
models. The main effect of rotation to be considered is the splitting
of multiplets in the oscillation frequency spectra. This splitting is
non-symmetric even for slowly rotating stars, if second-order effects
are included.
The linear nonadiabatic analysis of low-degree oscillations
( 4) was performed using
the code developed by Dziembowski (1977). In the modern version of the
code, effects of slow stellar rotation on oscillation frequencies are
taken into account up to second order in the rotational velocity
(Dziembowski & Goode 1992, Soufi et al. 1998).
4.2. Model constraints using oscillation data
The models for FG Vir were constructed with the observed mode
(12.154 c/d) being identified with the
radial fundamental mode (=F ) (see Sect. 3). Note that this
determines the mean density of all possible models of FG Vir:
with the pulsation constant of about 0.032 - 0.034 days, which is
typical for Scuti variables, we obtain
0.15-0.17. A considerably more accurate value
of the density will be obtained later in this section.
We started with the construction of evolutionary tracks of 1.75 -
1.95 models for initial abundances
and and using OPAL
opacities. No overshooting from the convective core was allowed. The
initial equatorial rotational velocity on the ZAMS was chosen to be 50
km/s. With our assumption of conservation of global angular momentum,
the equatorial rotational velocity is decreasing during the
MS-evolution from 50 km/s at the ZAMS to about 40-41 km/s at the TAMS
(Terminal-Age-Main-Sequence). The evolutionary tracks are shown in
Fig. 4 together with the range in effective temperature and gravity of
FG Vir (see Introduction) derived from photometric calibrations
( K and ). This range
requires MS models and constrains the mass of the models to
1.75-1.95 . The position of the models,
whose F -mode has a value of 12.154 c/d is also shown.
This further constrains the mass to
1.815-1.875 . We stress that this strong
seismological mass constraint depends on an accurate effective
temperature determination.
![[FIGURE]](img68.gif) |
Fig. 4. Evolutionary tracks of 1.75-1.95 standard models. The equatorial rotational velocity on the ZAMS was chosen to be 50 km/s. On the TAMS (at the turn-off points to the left), equatorial velocities are of about 40-41 km/s. Dashed lines show effective temperature and ranges of FG Vir from photometric calibrations. The thin solid line connects models whose radial fundamental mode frequency is 12.154 c/d. The rotational velocity of the models along this line is about 45 km/s
|
The identification of F agrees well
with the gravity estimate for FG Vir. This provides no additional
constraints on the stellar mass since the lines of constant
frequencies are approximately parallel to those of constant gravity,
as shown in the lower panel of Fig. 4.
For a given family of stellar models, the radial fundamental
pulsation constant, Q, is constant with a quite high accuracy
due to the homologous structure of models of different masses. For
M = 1.80 - 1.90 in the range
= 3.869 - 3.881 ( = 7400 -
7600 K), the pulsation constant Q = 0.0326 with relative
accuracy of about 0.2%. The accuracy will be still higher by
approximately one order of magnitude if we consider only models based
on F . For these models we determine a
mean density of . However, such an extremely
high accuracy is based on a fixed choice of input physics: stellar
opacity, initial chemical composition, rotational velocity and
parameters of convection. We will see in the next subsection that
changing these parameters results in significantly larger spread of
mean density for FG Vir models.
The strict constraint on mass is demonstrated in Fig. 5, where the
changes of radial and dipole frequencies during MS evolution are
shown. This agreement is an independent qualitative argument in favour
of the proposed models for FG Vir. Another important result is
the good agreement of the predicted frequency range of unstable modes
with the observed frequency range of 9-34 c/d. An additional test
shows that should we identify with the first
radial overtone instead of the F -mode, we cannot achieve
agreement between the theoretical and observed frequency ranges: in
the corresponding models of the instability
occurs in the frequency range of 8-30 c/d. The tendency in models
of higher mass to shift the instability range to lower frequencies can
be also seen in Fig. 5. There is an even stronger argument against
these higher-mass models: their luminosities are too high
( ) to be consistent with both the photometric
calibrations and the Hipparcos parallax.
![[FIGURE]](img76.gif) |
Fig. 5. Main-sequence evolution of low-order frequency spectra of radial and dipole oscillations of stellar models with masses 1.80, 1.85 and 1.90 . In each panel, lefmost and rightmost points correspond to the ZAMS and to the TAMS models, respectively. Large filled circles denote unstable modes. For simplicity, for only axisymmetric ( ) components of the dipole multiplets are shown. Rectangular boxes mark the observational frequency and effective temperature range of FG Vir. The vertical line in each panel denotes a model whose radial fundamental frequency (F -mode) fits the observational frequency = 12.154 c/d. Only models with masses 1.815-1.875 fit the allowed temperature range
|
A number of gravity modes must be excited in FG Vir, if the
assumption of F is true, because the two
lowest frequencies are more than 25% lower than the F -mode.
Moreover, during the MS-evolution the frequencies of low-order g-modes
increase and approach consecutively the frequencies of low-order
p-modes resulting in mode interactions and avoided crossings (see Unno
et al. 1989 and references therein). The frequency spectrum is much
more complicated than in the case of pure p- or g-modes, as shown in
Fig. 5 for dipole modes. The avoided crossing phenomenon takes place
approximately in the middle of the observed frequency interval.
Therefore, most of the excited modes at these and at lower frequencies
are of mixed character: they behave like p-modes in the envelope and
like g-modes in the interior. In the 1.85
model with , modes ,
and are of mixed
character. The frequencies of modes at avoided crossing are sensitive
to the structure of the deep stellar interior. Consequently, the
detection of these modes is important for testing convective
overshooting theories (Dziewbowski & Pamyatnykh 1991).
Avoided crossings for quadrupole modes in the models of FG Vir
occur close to the upper border of the observed frequency interval and
also close to the F -mode. This means that most of
p-modes in the interval already interacted with
gravity modes and are of mixed character.
4.3. Effects of different input parameters on the FG Vir models
The 1.85 model for FG Vir, which was
discussed in the previous subsection, will be referred to as the
standard or reference model with the input parameters:
, ,
, ,
km/s and OPAL opacities. To examine the
effects of varying input parameters on the predicted frequency
spectrum, all these and the stellar mass were varied, under the
condition that .
The changes introduced by using different opacities or non-standard
chemical composition were mainly compensated by changes in mass, in
order to fulfill the only identification we use.
The main characteristics of twelve models of that series are given
in Table 3. Model 2 differs from model 1 (our reference model) in
mass; models 3, 4, 5 - in rotational velocity; model 6 versus 1 will
demonstrate effect of changing the mixing-length parameter
; model 7 versus 1 will show effect of the
overshooting; models 8 and 9 have non-standard chemical composition;
finally, models 10, 11 and 12 differ from model 1 in opacity
(additionally, overshooting is taken into account in the model
12).
![[TABLE]](img92.gif)
Table 3. Parameters of FG Vir models with . The symbols have their usual meaning (see text). For the opacity, , the OPAL, OP or arficially modified OPAL data were used. is the ratio of frequency of radial fundamental mode, , to that of third overtone, ![[FORMULA]](img91.gif)
Note the significantly larger spread in stellar mass between
different models (1.72-2.00 ) than for the mass
interval of 1.815-1.875 in the case of the
standard choice of input parameters as was discussed in the previous
subsection. The same is true for the mean density range: in
Table 3 it varies between = 0.1542 and
0.1597 (or between 0.1558 and 0.1584 when using only OPAL opacities).
This spread is at least one order of magnitude larger than for the
standard input data. Nevertheless, this seismic estimate of the mean
density, which is based both on the well determined effective
temperature and the one identification we are using, provides a strong
constraint on possible FG Vir models
2.
We note that besides quite different stellar masses of 1.7 - 2.0
(see Table 3) the evolutionary tracks for
all 12 models in their MS-part lie well inside the region of 1.80 -
1.90 of the standard set. Including a
luminosity estimation from trigonometric
parallax determined by Hipparcos, all MS model tracks pass the error
box, as well as the error box in the
- -diagram. On the contrary,
none of the post-MS models fits such a combination of parameters.
4.4. The problem of the radial frequency ratio
Viskum et al. (1998) identified as a radial
mode. We note here that the phase-difference method presented earlier
in this paper allows both = 0 and 1 for
, i. e. radial as well as nonradial pulsation.
We will now examine the radial hypothesis. In the last column of
Table 3 the ratio of frequencies of the radial fundamental mode,
, and of the third overtone,
, is given ( ). For models
1-10 these values are close to, but not equal to the observed ratio of
, independent of which parameter was changed.
This can also be seen in Fig. 6, where the ratio
, is plotted against for
a wide range of parameters of Scuti star
models. There are well-defined monotonic variations of this ratio with
changing mass, effective temperature or chemical composition, but the
observed ratio disagrees with all these results.
![[FIGURE]](img101.gif) |
Fig. 6. Frequency ratio of the radial fundamental mode to the third overtone for a wide range of parameters of Scuti star models and of some FG Vir models from Table 3 (asterisks). The large filled circle corresponds to the observed frequency ratio, , of 0.5193. Only the models with artificially modified opacities (such as model 12 of Table 3) can fit the observed ratio
|
The only exception is the model 12 with artificial opacities, which
was constructed in the following way. For FG Vir models, the frequency
ratio is most sensitive to the choice of opacities as it can be seen
from comparison of models 10 and 1 (OP versus OPAL opacities).
Physically, OP data differ from those of OPAL by underestimation of
collective effects in stellar plasma, therefore OP opacities are
systematically lower than OPAL in deep stellar interiors. For
FG Vir models, this difference in opacity is about 20% at
temperatures above K. In the envelope, at
lower temperatures, OP opacity varies slightly more monotonously along
radius than does OPAL opacity: some dips are slightly shallower and
some bumps are more flat. The differences do not exceed 8%: for
example, at a temperature of K the OP
opacity is 4% smaller and at a temperature of
K it is 7.5% higher than the OPAL
opacity.
Using the fact that the difference in frequency ratios between
model 1 (OPAL) and model 10 (OP) is comparable with the difference
between model 1 and the observations (but these differences are of
opposite sign, see Fig. 7), we performed a very simple numerical
experiment: we artificially scaled OPAL opacities with a factor, which
is the ratio of OPAL to OP data. More clearly, we used
. Models 11 and 12 were constructed using
. For model 12 we additionally set
to and lowered the
rotational velocity. This model fits the observed frequency ratio very
nicely as demonstrated in Fig. 7. However, this agreement should not
be construed as an indicator for a new revision of atomic physics data
on opacity, since the mode identification from Viskum et al. (1998)
may not be unique due to the size of the error bars. Moreover, we
cannot exclude additional effects like nonlinear mode interaction or
rotational mode coupling, which may influence the frequency spectrum.
In the last section the problem of rotational mode coupling will be
briefly discussed. The observed variability of the amplitude of mode
is another argument in favour of possible
nonlinear mode interaction.
![[FIGURE]](img111.gif) |
Fig. 7. Frequency spectra of radial, dipole and quadrupole oscillations of various FG Vir models. Axisymmetric modes ( ) are marked by enlarged circles. Model numbers (see Table 3 for parameters) together with some model indicators are given to the right of the panels. Vertical solid and dashed lines correspond to observed frequencies - statistically significant and probable, respectively. Numbers above some observed frequencies give identifications for the degree of the modes ( ) based on multicolor photometry data and on the results by Viskum et al. (1998)
|
Viskum et al. (1998) were able to interpret the observed frequency
ratio / as the radial
frequency ratio . They did not construct full
evolutionary models but scaled a model of 2.2 ,
which was selected to match the observed frequency ratio with the
radial frequency ratio . Using the homology
argument, they estimated the mean density of the true FG Vir
model by multiplying the mean density of the
2.2 model by the square of the ratio
/ . In such a way an
agreement between observed frequencies ,
and a pair of radial modes of the scaled model
was achieved by definition. The estimated gravity, luminosity and
distance of the scaled model were found to be in good agreement with
the photometric and the spectroscopic data and with the Hipparcos
parallax. The authors noted that the high precision of their
asteroseismic density estimate ( ) is based on a
fixed (solar) metallicity for FG Vir. Indeed, with our standard
choice of chemical abundances and opacity and assuming the fit
we estimated the mean density of the
FG Vir model with even five times higher accuracy (see Sect.
4.2), but possible variations of the global parameters result in at
least one order of magnitude worse precision of this estimate.
4.5. Theoretical frequency spectra versus observations
Frequency spectra of radial, dipole and quadrupole modes for all 12
models from Table 3 are shown in Fig. 7. The effects of different
choices of input parameters can be estimated by comparison of the
results for different models. We discuss here both general properties
and some peculiarities of these frequency spectra.
For nonradial oscillations, evolutionary overlapping of frequency
intervals of g- and p-modes (see Fig. 5) results in avoided crossings,
which disturb the approximately equidistant frequency spacing between
acoustic multiplets. Gravity and mixed modes are very sensitive to the
interior structure as can be seen for models of different chemical
composition, different opacities and for models with and without
overshooting. On the contrary, the change of
(model 6 versus model 1) has a negligible influence on the frequency
spectrum due to ineffective convection in the relatively hot envelope
of FG Vir.
Rotation splits nonradial multiplets and strongly complicates the
frequency spectra. Except for models with slowest rotation, we observe
a forest of quadrupole modes in the low-frequency part of the
interval, with overlapping components of the different multiplets. The
common property of the spectra is a large asymmetry of the rotational
splitting, which is caused by the second-order effects of rotation
(Dziembowski & Goode 1992). The asymmetry is higher the higher the
order of the p-modes is.
It is not trivial to select a model reproducing the observed
frequencies exactly. Simple attempts to minimize frequency differences
(O-C) by a combined variation of input parameters of the reference
model fail due to strong and non-linear sensitivity of gravity modes
to interior structure. At the same time, this strong sensitivity may
help to fit some chosen frequencies without changing the rest of the
spectrum, (cf. models 1 and 7, for example). It is obvious from Fig. 7
that generally it is much easier to fit a low-frequency mode than a
high-frequency mode, because the spectrum is more dense at lower
frequencies. For some of the observed modes there is no satisfactory
solution: see, for example, the group
, ,
around 21 c/d or
at 33 c/d. Besides geometric cancellation, there are no
objections to identify frequencies in the gaps with modes of degree
=3 and =4. Note that even
for the number of unstable modes is a few
times larger than the observed one: in the observational frequency
interval there are 6-7 radial modes, 24 dipole modes and 50-55
quadrupole modes. Therefore, a presently unknown mode selection
mechanism must exist.
Note that most of the models presented in Fig. 7 show a good fit of
the dominant observed mode (12.716 c/d) with
mode of or 0. This is in
agreement with the mode identification from photometric phase
differences. On the contrary, it is quite difficult to achieve a
similar fit with a dipole mode for the observed mode
(23.403 c/d). In Table 4 we present some
results to quantify the fitting of 21 modes (corresponding to the
observed frequencies through
, omitting ) for models
1 (reference model), 3 (low rotation), 8 ( ,
) and 12 (artificially modified opacity +
overshooting). In the cases of close observed frequencies (for
example, , ,
around 24 c/d, or
, ,
around 21 c/d) we give a few possible
identifications for each frequency. Moreover, if there is no
mode for a given observed frequency, we show
the closest mode of or 4: the frequency
spectrum of these modes is so dense that practically everywhere in the
observed interval a fitting within 0.1 c/d is possible.
![[TABLE]](img131.gif)
Table 4. Best fits for some FG Vir models
Model 12 seems to be the best-fitting model in our series. Note the
excellent agreements in both frequency and
-identifications for all ten dominant
frequencies. The mean difference (O-C) is about 0.04 c/d for
these modes. The fit for most of the remaining frequencies is also
good, once modes are
considered. Possible discrepances at low frequencies do not appear
serious to us due to the strong sensitivity of g-modes to model
parameters. Because of the effects of avoided crossing some of the
quadrupole modes of higher order are also quite sensitive to small
variations of parameters (cf. modes for models
1 and 2 at approximately 32 c/d).
In Fig. 8 we compare the range of observed frequencies and of
excited modes explicitly for the reference model as well as three
other models. FG Vir is located in the HR-diagram in the middle
of the instability strip (see, for example, Breger & Pamyatnykh
1998). Consequently, the driving of oscillations is effective in a
wide frequency region which extends over 7 radial overtones. The
independence of the driving efficiency on the mode degree,
, is typical for the oscillations excited by the
opacity mechanism.
![[FIGURE]](img137.gif) |
Fig. 8. Normalized growth-rates, , of low-degree oscillation modes of some FG Vir models from Table 4. Only axisymmetric modes ( ) are shown. Positive values correspond to unstable modes. Vertical lines mark observed frequencies from Table 1, probable frequencies to are shorter. The longest line at 12.716 c/d corresponds to the mode with the highest amplitude
|
We also note that the observed frequency spectrum is divided
clearly into two groups: at 9-13 c/d and at 19-25 c/d. However, the
present models do not predict any instability gap in frequency, as can
be seen in Fig. 8.
4.6. Rotational mode coupling
An additional factor which influences the frequencies of a rotating
star is the coupling between modes with close frequencies whose
azimuthal orders, m, are the same and whose degrees,
, are also the same or differ by 2. The effect
was described and discussed in detail by Dziembowski & Goode
(1992) and by Soufi et al. (1998). The frequency distance between two
near-degenerate modes increases when coupling is taken into account.
The significance of this rotational frequency perturbation was
demonstrated by Pamyatnykh et al. (1998) in application to
XX Pyx. It was shown that at rotational velocity of about 90 km/s
the frequency shifts of coupled radial and quadrupole (or dipole and
octupole) overtones achieve 0.1-0.2 c/d. Therefore, in particular, a
significant change of radial frequency ratios may be expected.
We estimated this effect in some of our FG Vir models and
found it to be unimportant at rotational velocities of about and less
than 45 km/s. For example, for the reference model 1, the frequencies
of the radial fundamental mode, , and of the
third overtone, , are changed due to coupling
with closest axisymmetric quadrupole modes by -0.0035 c/d and 0.0091
c/d, respectively. The effect is much stronger for more rapidly
rotating models: for model 5 with =
90 km/s, the radial fundamental mode and third overtone are
shifted by -0.0436 c/d and 0.1545 c/d, respectively, which results in
the change of the frequency ratio from 0.5266 to 0.5212. As another
example, we were able to reproduce the observed ratio
as the radial frequency ratio for a model with
initial abundances ,
and with = 91-92 km/s. However, the rapid
rotation seems to be rather improbable for FG Vir with
km/s, as it was discussed by Viskum et al.
(1998).
Note that the coupling effect is higher for higher overtones: for
model 5, the shift of the radial sixth overtone frequency (34.306 c/d)
is 0.520 c/d due to interaction with the closest axisymmetric
quadrupole mode of 34.219 c/d which is shifted by the same quantity
0.520 c/d in the opposite direction. Moreover,
modes are affected by coupling with modes, and
so on. We conclude that for rapidly rotating models it is necessary to
take the rotational coupling into account in attempts to fit the
observed frequency spectrum with the theoretical one.
The rotational coupling results also in a mutual contamination of
amplitudes of spherical harmonic components of interacting modes
(Soufi et al 1998, see examples in Table 4 of Pamyatnykh et al.
1998). This adversely affects the mode discrimination by means of
multicolor photometry (see the footnote in Sect. 3) and should
influence spectroscopic determinations as well. However, this effect
was found to be important only in models with more rapid rotation than
found for FG Vir. A more detailed discussion of the rotational
mode coupling problem in connection with the interpretation of the
observed multifrequency spectrum will be given by Dziembowski &
Goupil (1998).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: November 26, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |