Astron. Astrophys. 341, 256-263 (1999)
2. Observations
2.1. Observations at the Heinrich-Hertz-Telescope
The observations of the 12CO 3-2 line were conducted
with the 10-m Heinrich-Hertz-Telescope (for a description of the HHT,
see Baars & Martin 1996) on Mt. Graham in southern Arizona during
two observing sessions on December 18/19, 1997 and January 6/7 1998
under very good weather conditions. The spectrum of M 82 was measured
in May 1998. The zenith optical depth at 345 GHz was in most cases
0.2; only in a few observations was it as high as 0.4. Most sources
have been observed at actual optical depths ;
only for Cen A was 1.1. The latter source was
also partially blocked by trees, so the absolute calibration of Cen A
is much less secure than for the other sources. The atmospheric
fluctuations and the atmospheric model introduce a calibration
uncertainty not greater than 5%.
A 2 channel SIS receiver was equipped with a 1024 channel acousto
optical spectrometer with a total bandwidth of 1 GHz. The second
channel, which has a more reliable calibration, was used for this
study. System temperatures for a single sideband were typically
400-1500 K ( ). The beamwidth was 21". The
receiver was sensitive to both sidebands. The CO line was observed in
the lower sideband. Any imbalance of the gains in the lower and upper
sideband will increase the calibration errors. Tuning the receiver
with different parameters for the backshort resulted in variations of
the intensity of IC 342 of up to .
All results are given on a main-beam brightness temperature
( ) scale. This is related to the antenna
temperature via ; it is the same calibration
scheme as used at the IRAM 30-m telescope (Downes, 1989). The
main-beam efficiency, , has been measured by the
SMTO staff in November 1997 to be 0.50 ( ) toward
Saturn, which at that time had a size of 18". The surface of the HHT
is within m (i.e. at 345
GHz) very accurate. There are no strong error beams at 345 GHz. This
reduces the effect of source size on the appropriate source coupling
efficiency. The forward hemisphere efficiency, ,
is close to 1. On that scale, a spectrum of the CO
line taken toward IRC+10216 yields
and . The uncertainty of
introduces a 6% calibration uncertainty.
The spectra were taken using a wobbling secondary mirror with a
beam throw of in azimuth. Scans obtained with
reference positions on either side were coadded to ensure flat
baselines. Baselines of order zero or one were subtracted from the
data. The scale is determined by measurements
of an ambient load and the sky, which are interspersed with the
spectral line observations. The receiver temperature was determined
from measurements of an ambient load and a cold load (at liquid
nitrogen temperature) after each retuning of the receiver. The
variations of the sky opacity were also monitored by a tilting
radiometer at 230 GHz.
Our pointing was based on the pointing measurements obtained by the
SMTO staff, which gave an RMS deviation of measured pointing sources
from a best model of . For a 21" beam, the
resulting calibration uncertainty could result in an underestimate of
the intensity of a point source of , and less
for extended sources. Although most of our observed positions should
be exact within 5" we cannot exclude that a few sources have pointing
errors as large as half a beamwidth. This would result in an
underestimate of the calibration of 50%.
The calibration uncertainty resulting from the above factors (under
the assumption of a 5" pointing error) is ,
which is consistent with variations commonly observed at sub-mm
wavelengths.
2.2. Observations at the IRAM 30-m telescope
Some of our sources were observed at the IRAM 30-m telescope in the
and 2-1 transitions of 12CO in May
1998. The wobbling secondary mirror was used with a beam throw of
4´ in azimuth. Both lines were observed simultaneously using two
512 MHz filterbank spectrometers. The beamwidths
of the 30-m telescope at 115 and 230 GHz are 21 and 12". Except for
M 82, only the 115 GHz data were used in this paper since the
incomplete sampling of our maps did not allow to obtain 2-1 data
convolved to a 21" beam.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: November 26, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |