Astron. Astrophys. 341, 296-303 (1999)
7. Selection effects
We discuss some selection effects for the detection probability of
the dust detector to estimate this detection probability for particles
in prograde respectively retrograde orbits.
Generally objects are moving clockwise or anticlockwise around the
Sun. A clockwise moving particle seen from a point in the northern
hemisphere (above the ecliptic) is defined as being in retrograde
motion, whereas an anticlockwise motion describes a prograde orbit.
This property of the orbit is described by the orbital inclination. An
inclination within the interval from 0 to
describes prograde motion, whereas a retrograde orbit contains values
of the interval . Taking some geometric
consideration into account we make a prediction concerning the motion
of the detected particles. The selection effect is influenced by the
particular position of Ulysses, Sun and Earth, since the orientation
of the spin axis towards the Earth determines the orientation of the
detector (see Fig. 10). In the constellation shown in Fig. 10, a
predominant detection for particles in retrograde motion is expected.
These particles see a larger detection area than particles on prograde
orbits, which hit the detector perpendicular to the sensor axis. In
this case it is more likely that particles moving retrograde around
the Sun impact onto the dust detector, whereas the detection
probability for particles which move in the opposite direction is much
lower.
![[FIGURE]](img77.gif) |
Fig. 10. The detection probability is given for prograde (left side ) and for retrograde orbits (right side ). The particular position of Ulysses, Sun and Earth provides the selection effect accordingly.
|
A further selection effect mentioned by Wilck (1994) applies to the
time dependency of the detection probability of the dust detector
within one year. Using constant orbital parameters (inclination and
eccentricity) he calculated the effective area for different orbits
representing the outgoing (true anomaly 0) and
the incoming (true anomaly 0) branch. In his
results he shows a periodical change of the detection area with a
period of one year. With the help of this result he determined that
the months April to July are the favourable period for the detection
of -meteoroids which by definition are on an
outgoing branch.
Studying the out-of-ecliptic part of the Ulysses mission only 4
particles can be identified as -meteoroids in the
southern part, 19 particles can be identified as
-meteoroids in the northern part of the orbit. In
order to derive the kind of motion the inclinations of these particles
are determined. Only the part of the detector, which turns to the Sun,
is assumed as a possible impact area to derive the inclination. Out of
the 4 particles detected in the southern part 3 are classified to be
probably in prograde motion which confirms the geometrical
considerations presented before.
From the 19 particles that are identified as
-meteoroids in the northern path, 15 are in
prograde orbits and 4 in retrograde. Two of the four retrograde
-meteoroids are detected at the end of the last
phase according to the selection effect for retrograde particle. Here,
this effect is more distinctive than in the middle of the year where
no strong boundary for the selection effect existed. Defining the
selection effect which is introduced by Wilck (1994) a little more
widely, i.e. from April to the middle of August as the favorable time
span, fourteen of the twenty-three noted
-meteoroids confirm this choice. According to
this we conclude that -meteoroids are moving
predominantly on prograde orbits, because they are mostly detected
when the prograde selection effect applies. Taking into account the
influence of the uncertainties of the detector mentioned above we
cannot distinguish between prograde and retrograde orbits in the last
time interval around the north polar passage, so that the particles in
retrograde motion may be as typical as particles with prograde
orbits.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: November 26, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |