![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 342, 1-14 (1999) 7. Properties of galaxies in groupsIn this section we examine the luminosities and the spectral features of galaxies in different environments: the "field", groups, and clusters. The dependence of these properties on the environment offers insights into the processes of galaxy formation and evolution and on the dynamical status of groups. 7.1. The luminosity function of membersHere we investigate the possible difference between the luminosity functions of member and non-member galaxies. We compute the luminosity function with the STY method (Sandage, Tamman & Yahil 1979). We assume a Schechter (1976) form for the luminosity function and follow the procedure described in detail in Zucca et al. (1997). We find that galaxies in groups have a brighter
In Fig. 8 we draw (dotted lines) the confidence ellipses of the
The fact that galaxies in groups are brighter than non-member galaxies is a clear demonstration of the existence of luminosity segregation in the ESP survey, a much deeper survey than those where the luminosity segregation has been previously investigated (Park et al. 1994, Willmer et al. 1998). Our finding is consistent with the results of Lin et al. (1996), who find evidence of a luminosity bias in their analysis of the LCRS power spectrum. In further support of the existence of a luminosity segregation, we
also find that 7.2. Emission/absorption lines statisticsOne interesting question is whether the environment of a galaxy has a statistical influence on the presence of detectable emission lines in the galaxy spectrum. Because emission lines galaxies are mostly spirals (Kennicutt 1992), the answer to this question is relevant to the investigation of the morphology-density relation in systems of intermediate density. The fraction of ESP galaxies with detectable emission lines within
the redshift range
We consider three types of environments: a) the "field", i.e. all
galaxies that have not been assigned to groups, b) poor goups, i.e.
groups with 3
The significance of the correlation between environment and
Table 2. Frequency of Emission Line Galaxies in Different Environments The contingency coefficient is C=0.15 and the significance of the correlation between environment and frequency of emission line galaxies exceeds the 99.9% level. Our result indicates that the morphology-density relation extends over the whole range of densities from groups to clusters. Previous indications of the existence of the morphology-density relation for groups are based either on very local samples (Postman & Geller 1984) or on samples that are not suitable for statistical analysis (Allington-Smith et al. 1993). Very recently, Hashimoto et al. (1998) also confirm the existence of a morphology-density relation over a wide range of environment densities within LCRS. Examining our result in more detail, we note that the fraction of
Our catalog also includes ESP counterparts of 17 clusters listed in
at least one of the ACO, ACOS (Abell et al. 1989) or EDCC (Lumsden et
al. 1992) catalogs (Sect. 8, Table 3). For these clusters
Many systems of our catalog are not completely surveyed, therefore
the relationship between 7.3. Seyfert galaxiesWithin ESP we identify 12 Seyfert 1 galaxies and 9 Seyfert 2
galaxies. We identify type 1 Seyferts visually on the basis of the
presence of broad (FWHM of a few
The identification of type 2 Seyferts is not straightforward,
because it is based on line ratios and usually requires measurements
of emission lines which fall outside our spectral range: only the
F([O III] The origin of the Seyfert phenomenon could be related to the interaction with close companions (Balick & Heckman 1982, Petrosian 1982, Dahari 1984, MacKenty 1989), or to a dense environment (Kollatschny & Fricke 1989, De Robertis et al. 1998). Observational evidence is, however, far from conclusive. For example, Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 2 galaxies have been found to have an excess of (possibly) physical companions compared to other spiral galaxies by Rafanelli et al. (1995). Laurikainen & Salo (1995) agree with Rafanelli et al. (1995) about Seyfert 2 galaxies, but reach the opposite conclusion about Seyfert 1 galaxies. In our case, 7 (33%) out of 21 Seyferts are group members. For comparison, 460 (34%) emission line galaxies (not including Seyfert galaxies) are group members and 879 are either isolated or binaries. Clearly, within the limits of our relatively poor statistics, we find that Seyfert galaxies do not prefer a different environment than that of the other emission line galaxies. In order to test the dependence of the Seyfert phenomenon on the interaction of galaxies with close companions rather than with the general environment, we compute for all Seyferts and emission line galaxies the projected linear distance to their nearest neighbor, the nn-distance. We limit the search of companions to galaxies that are closer than 3000 km s-1 along the line of sight. We find that the distribution of nn-distances of the sample of Seyfert galaxies is not significantly different from that of all emission line galaxies. We also consider the frequency of companions at projected linear
distances We note that members of close angular pairs
( In order to estimate how strongly our result could be affected by
this observational bias, we identify the nearest neighbors of Seyfert
and emission line galaxies from a list including both galaxies with
redshift and objects that have not been observed. When we compute
projected linear distances to objects that have not been observed, we
assume that they are at the same redshift of their candidate companion
galaxy. As before, we do not find significant differences between the
new nn-distributions of Seyferts and
This result demonstrates that the higher average incompleteness of close angular pairs does not affect our main conclusions: a) Seyfert galaxies within ESP are found as frequently within groups as other emission line galaxies, b) Seyfert galaxies show a small but not significant excess of close physical companions relative to the other emission line galaxies. We point out again that the sample of Seyferts is rather small and the statistical uncertainties correspondingly large. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: December 22, 1998 ![]() |