Astron. Astrophys. 342, 201-211 (1999)
5. An approximation for a general atmosphere
Model atmospheres are usually not so perfect as to be considered in
the cases treated in the last section. In the absence of a general
analytical solution for the evolution operator, we must manage those
general models numerically. Our strategy is to integrate everything we
can and to linearize the rest. For this purpose we borrow a technique
from other successful numerical integrators as the well-known DELO
(Rees et al., 1989). In what follows we develop this idea.
We want to integrate the transfer equation
![[EQUATION]](img217.gif)
or alternatively
![[EQUATION]](img218.gif)
The integration is to be made in the interval
and the atmosphere in the two
extreme points and
is specified, that is, we know
and
and also
and
. The incoming light
is also given. We want to obtain
the polarized light at :
. After the last section we already
know how to integrate the transfer equation if the atmosphere is
characterized by the prescriptions given there. Note that, given the
atmosphere at the two points and
, one can always calculate the
angles and
and the matrix
at those two levels, and look for a
suitable integrable atmosphere in agreement with expression (27) which
satisfy the data at and
as far as possible. So let us
approximate our atmosphere between these two levels by this integrable
atmosphere, represented by a matrix
and an emission vector . We can
obtain a solution for the equation
![[EQUATION]](img231.gif)
taking as initial condition .
Substraction of Eq. (65) from Eq. (64) results in
![[EQUATION]](img233.gif)
and upon formal integration:
![[EQUATION]](img234.gif)
where and
given as solution to Eq. (65). This
equation reflects the error made under the previous approximation.
Following our strategy, once we have solved for the integrable part we
linearize the rest. So that we now assume that the right hand side of
equation (66) is small and can be linearized in the interval
. We define
![[EQUATION]](img238.gif)
and upon linearization we write
![[EQUATION]](img239.gif)
where
![[EQUATION]](img240.gif)
At , we have
, and we obtain
![[EQUATION]](img243.gif)
To solve Eq. (67) we write
![[EQUATION]](img244.gif)
And by means of the linearization the last integral becomes
![[EQUATION]](img245.gif)
so that, substituting a and b by its complete
expressions
![[EQUATION]](img246.gif)
In this expression everything is already known except for
that is precisely what we want to
calculate.
A convenient choice of the overlined parameters may render equation
(73) simpler. For illustration, let us choose
![[EQUATION]](img248.gif)
and ,
. We then obtain
![[EQUATION]](img251.gif)
a solution for . This solution is
not exact, its precision depends on how good the linear approximation
is. In the limit, we can made the integration interval
as small as we want but at the cost
of increasing the number of layers. A compromise will be necessary
between speed and required precision.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: December 22, 1998
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |