![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 342, 867-880 (1999) 6. Evolution of chromospheric fine structuresWe observed the evolution of the quiescent filament channel during
10 hours on September 25 6.1. Quasi-static evolutionAt a first sight, it may appear irrelevant to use the reconstruction of magnetic configurations which are in equilibrium to model an evolution. However, as long as it does not enter an eruptive phase, the filament evolution is mainly driven by the motions of photospheric magnetic fields. These polarities move with a typical speed of 0.1 to 1 km s-1, which is very small compared to the Alfvén velocity in the corona (of the order of thousands of km s-1) and even in prominences (a few hundreds km s-1). Consequently, the global magnetic field is likely to evolve quasi-statically, hypothesis well justified by the observed velocities (see Sect. 7). The twisted flux-tube which defines the main body of the filament
is not expected to evolve significantly, since this part of the
filament was quiescent long before and after the day of September
25 6.2. Evolution of the filament channel on September 25
In this section we extrapolate the magnetic field from modified
SOHO/MDI magnetograms. We compare the 3-D distribution of dipped field
lines with H
6.2.1. The main body of the filamentThe straight body of the filament moves away from the strong
positive magnetic polarity which is present close to the photospheric
inversion line, in the vicinity of N1 and N2 (see Sect. 4.2.2). It has
the same polarity as the background field on the right-hand side of
the inversion line (i.e. positive polarity). As this polarity
decreases in flux and moves away from the main inversion line (see
Fig. 4), the global distribution of dips becomes more straight along
the inversion line as does the filament body in
H
On the other hand, where there is a parasitic polarity, the twisted flux-tube as well as the low-altitude portions of neighboring field lines are locally bent towards the photosphere, forming new dips (e.g. the group of positive polarities at the top-left side of the filament in Fig. 3a,b). The evolution of these polarities close to the photospheric inversion line is closely related to the changing of the shape of the filament body. 6.2.2. Correlation between the feet and the parasitic polaritiesIn this evolution, the best modeled foot is the largest one which is at the middle-right of the filament (F1). At 08:43 UT, F1 is not well formed (see Fig. 3a,b). The two negative polarities which form it are far from one another (see Fig. 4a): N1, which is very close to the inversion line (only leading to a weak perturbation of the filament body), and the other one N2, is at approximately 20 Mm on the right (it forms an isolated dip pattern). By 12:14 UT, both polarities have moved towards each other (see Fig. 4b), leading to a large and quasi-continuous dip pattern which forms the lateral foot F1 (see Fig. 3c,d). From 15:57 UT to 17:04 UT the polarity N2 gradually moves to the north (see Fig. 4c,d). This leads to a displacement of F1 which gets more and more perpendicular to the filament (Fig. 3e-h). Some other large and dark lateral extensions appear at different
times, which have the characteristics of lateral feet. A careful look
at them reveals that, even if they are not as well modeled as the foot
F1, their observed main shape and evolution in
H 6.2.3. The evolution of the "M-shaped" fine structureWe leave to the reader a detailed comparison between all the observed dark features with the distribution of dips (as there are many to look at, and as we do not want to describe all these in details), taking into account the problems expressed in Appendix B. We only describe below the evolution of one of the groups of dark
fibrils which is well observed and fairly well modeled. This dark
feature was previously named as S4 in Fig. 1a,b at 12:14 UT. It shows
an "M-shaped" dark pattern at 08:43 UT (see Fig. 3a and the Box 4 in
Fig. 5). S4 is formed by a group of weak parasitic polarities. Their
maximum vertical field is approximately equal to 10 G at 08:43 UT, and
they form a set of very low lying dips which appear below 2 Mm (see
Fig. 2b,d). The dip pattern of S4 is not continuous, so it is not easy
to recognize the M-shape, though a careful look at the orientation and
location of the computed dips shows an agreement with the observed
"M-shaped" structure in H
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: February 23, 1999 ![]() |