![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 343, 325-332 (1999) 1. IntroductionMost of theoretical astronomy uses Newtonian theory of gravitation, considering that the effects of general relativity are weak for most astronomical objects. Even in situations where these effects do become important or even dominant, pseudo-Newtonian models have often been applied which aspire to mimic the corresponding relativistic situations. Pseudo-Newtonian approaches aim to save numerical work, to enable analytical solutions where fully relativistic treatment is too cumbersome, and to provide new insights into the relativity theory and its implications. The present contribution concerns pseudo-Newtonian models developed
in order to describe very compact objects which presumably reside in
the nuclei of galaxies and in some X-ray binaries (e.g., Rees 1998).
In these sources, a key feature is an accretion disc around a rotating
black hole. The actual accretion flows are most likely non-stationary,
non-axisymmetric, and described by complex local physics. For the sake
of simplicity, however, a standard model of disc accretion (see Kato
et al. (1998) for a textbook exposition of the accretion theory
including its recent advances) provides an ingenious approximation:
the standard disc is smooth, axially symmetric, geometrically thin,
and characterized by three parameters. It is astrophysically realistic
only in a restricted range of its parameters. The pseudo-Newtonian
approach has been devised in order to introduce effects of general
relativity into accretion models, especially in the case of
geometrically thick discs
(Paczynski & Wiita 1980).
The black hole is treated there as a Newtonian body whose
gravitational field is determined by the potential
The pseudo-Newtonian potential for a non-rotating black hole has
been used in numerous works and we recall at least a few of them. For
example, Abramowicz et al. (1988) used
Now we come to the case of a rotating black hole. At least two
topics of current astrophysical interest can immediately be mentioned
where the frame-dragging effects around a rotating black hole are
important: the problem of oscillations of relativistic accretion discs
(see Wagoner 1999 for a recent review), and that of precessing discs
in low-mass X-ray binaries (Stella & Vietri 1997) and black-hole
binaries (Wei et al. 1998). It is apparent that the whole subject of
oscillation modes in relativistic discs calls for detailed
investigation (cf. also
Markovic & Lamb 1998) and a
suitable pseudo-Newtonian formulation can be an appropriate tool
before embarking on a complete solution. However, unlike the case of
stationary gaseous configurations, nonstationary phenomena require a
more refined choice of the pseudo-Newtonian model because there are
additional quantities apart from the location of marginal circular
orbits which must be correctly modelled (e.g.
Although the ever increasing computational facilities will make practical reasons for the pseudo-Newtonian approach rather old-fashioned in near future, what still remains desirable is a simple expression which would simulate the rotating (Kerr) black hole accurately. This is however difficult to find. For example, the potential suggested by Chakrabarti & Khanna (1992) could be useful in studying thin accretion discs around rotating holes, but it applies only to the equatorial plane and its interpretation is rather unclear (free parameters are fitted in a purely pragmatic manner for a restricted set of trajectories). Another form of the pseudo-Newtonian potential has recently been proposed by Artemova et al. (1996). This pseudo-potential reproduces very well steady circular motion but it ignores all effects which in the true Kerr metric are ascribed to the Lense-Thirring precession and which make test-particle trajectories non-planar. This is also the main reason why, in contrast to the non-rotating case, pseudo-potentials for the Kerr metric have had rather restricted impact. Also, a proper understanding of these generalizations may be as difficult as employing general relativity fully. However, the motivation which stems from attempts to understand and interpret predictions of the relativity theory has not disappeared. It is the aim of our present contribution to discuss the
pseudo-Newtonian modelling of the gravitational field of a rotating
(Kerr) black hole, and also to propose how to test such models. One
should remember that the idea of the pseudo-Newtonian approach
represents a certain mathematical model rather than a rigorously
defined approximation such as e.g. the weak-field approximation of the
Einstein equations. The model does not aspire to represent any
gravitational theory and, in particular, the corresponding potential
is not required to satisfy any field equations. (It is exactly the
lack of precise definition of the approximation method which leads us
to introduce a test of accuracy of the model in the present article.)
This fact, however, does not diminish the practical value of
Paczy We start by writing down the spatial components of the Kerr
geodesic equation in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates
where M and a are parameters of the Kerr solution, and the
dot denotes differentiation with respect to the affine parameter
normalized so that the 4-momentum is
In the next section, Newtonian equations of test-particle motion in an axially symmetric gravitational field are given. In Sect. 3, we derive a pseudo-Newtonian potential for which these equations get a form very similar to the above geodesic equation in the Kerr spacetime. 1 In Sect. 4, numerical integration is carried out for a large number of trajectories both in the Kerr and in the "pseudo-Kerr" fields. A specific criterion analogous to the method of Lyapunov coefficients is introduced and the rate of divergence of each couple of corresponding trajectories is determined numerically. The mean values of this rate obtained for various combinations of constants of motion indicate the quality (i.e. accuracy, as defined below) of the pseudo-Newtonian approximation. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: March 1, 1999 ![]() |