SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 343, 909-915 (1999)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

3. The peculiarity of present low state

MV Lyr is currently in a low brightness state which has lasted three years. It has not much resembled the previous one, which lasted 10 years. To demonstrate this, we present the overall light curve of MV Lyr over the last 20 years (Fig. 1). This light curve was partially published (Pavlenko 1998b), but is here augmented by data from VSNET and VSOLJ, available at the server ftp://ftp.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp, as well as our own new observations. The times of detailed study in the bright state are marked by arrows.

[FIGURE] Fig. 1. The overall light curve of MV Lyr during 1979-1998. The B-magnitudes are plotted versus Julian date. The data taken from Pavlenko & Shugarov (1998), Pavlenko (1998b), Shugarov & Pavlenko (1998), Rosino et al. (1993), are marked by filled circles, and those from VSNET and VSOLJ by open circles. The arrows indicate the positions of intense observation (many-hours observational data set per several nights). The references shown by arrows on the light curve are: A1989 = Andronov et al., 1992, B1990 = Borisov, 1992, SPT1993 = Skillman et al. 1995, PS1997 = present paper.

As mentioned above, the previous low state was punctuated by outbursts of different amplitude (Shugarov & Pavlenko 1998). The jumps in brightness reached no higher than [FORMULA], never quite to the high state level. At the present low state the small outbursts have not been observed, whereas large ones occur every [FORMULA] days. In all there were five such outbursts (and the sixth one is observing at present time). In accordance with the observed frequency of outburst, one could expect such an outburst within [FORMULA], but the lack of data does not permit us to conclude whether the expected outburst occurred.

The frequency of these outbursts agrees with the Parenago-Kukarkin relation for dwarf novae (Kukarkin & Parenago 1934, Kholopov & Efremov 1976, Warner 1987) between amplitude and recurrence time. However, its decay time of [FORMULA] is far too long to be consistent with the characteristic dwarf novae decay times given by Bailey (1975) and Warner (1987).

In contrast to the previous low state ([FORMULA]), the peak brightness of outbursts is now similar to the brightness of the true high state. So the description of the present state is somewhat ambiguous: regular outbursts superposed on the low state, or regular fadings from the high to the low state.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999

Online publication: March 1, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de