![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 344, 154-162 (1999) 5. Summary and conclusionsWe have presented a sample of four untypical flare events and provided a common explanation: Parameters that depend on the size of the emitting plasma volume (e.g. count rate, EM) deviate from the standard exponential decay behavior due to temporary occultation of the flaring volume by the rotating star. This is most evident from the large flare on Algol, for which the data are most abundant and our modeling is therefore most reliable. The comparatively slow rise of the count rate in the X-ray lightcurve, broad maxima and following exponential decay are well represented by a model that describes emission from a spherical plasma loop that emerges from the back of the star and gradually rotates into the line of sight of the observer. The increasing visible fraction of the loop produces the flat maximum and apparent slow-down of the rise stage. In our data there is no indication for sine-like modulation of the
X-ray lightcurve, since all but one of the lightcurves are clearly
asymmetric, and the duration of all events is well below the
rotational period of the host star. The only exception is the flare on
V773 Tau where Skinner et al. (1997) proposed sinusoidal modulation to
reproduce the shape of the ASCA lightcurve. We suggest a
different explanation involving a second X-ray emitting region on the
star additionally to a rotationally modulated flare to come up for the
`convex' shape of the lightcurve. However, due to the lack of
pre-flare data, no conclusive evidence is present for either of the
interpretations. Evidence for reheating of the plasma at
The decay timescales In view of the large relative size of the ratio between loop and star radius the assumptions we explain in Sect. 3 concerning our model for a rotating flare might seem somewhat oversimplifying. We also note that different solutions of the model seem to describe the data equally well even in the case of the well restrained Algol observation. Therefore, uncertainties in the fit parameters are to be regarded carefully. However, the qualitative description of the scenario is very good and the data are well represented by the model. Other interpretations of the `anomalous' flare events we presented in this paper may not be excluded but are still to be traced. Clearly, continuous observations of whole flares are needed to
verify whether an event could be subject to rotational modulation of
the kind we discussed in this paper. Up to date most of the flares
observed lack completeness in that either the rise or part of the
decay were missed by the observation. In the near future XMM
will provide the possibility of long, uninterrupted observations (up
to ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: March 10, 1999 ![]() |