![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 344, 402-408 (1999) 4. Discussion4.1. Faraday rotation measuresThere are essentially two possible origins for the high rotation
measure of 3C 119: the presence of a dense Galactic cloud along
the line of sight to the source, or the presence of thermal plasma
near the source, possibly associated with 3C 119 itself. Although
typical Galactic rotation measures are tens of rad/m2,
3C 119 is very close to the Galactic plane (its Galactic latitude
is If the rotation measure of 3C 119 were Galactic in origin,
however, we would expect to see a nearly uniform rotation measure
distribution over the source, with any gradients not having any
apparent relation to the source structure. Flatters (1998) obtained
VLBA observations similar to ours at 5 GHz, which suggested that
the rotation measure of 3C 119 was concentrated near component C;
however, the resolution and sensitivity provided by those observations
were insufficient to draw definitive conclusions about the
rotation-measure distribution across C. The
The rotation-measure gradient across component C is quite large,
4.2. Magnetic fieldOur observations have, thus, resolved the Faraday screen on
milliarcsecond scales. This enables us to "derotate" the observed
Just south of the peak of component C, the B field has swung towards the south, toward the direction of component D. It is a quite natural interpretation that this, likewise, reflects the local jet flow direction. As shown in Fig. 3, the degree of polarization in component C is maximum to the west of the peak of C. If, indeed, component C represents the place where the VLBI jet is deflected by a dense clump in the external medium, we would expect the magnetic field to be enhanced by compression. This may provide an explanation for the fact that the maximum degree of polarization in C is located to the west of the I peak: it is displaced toward the region of maximum compression. 4.3. DepolarizationThe bandwidth depolarization within each of our 8-GHz frequency
channels is estimated to be much less than one percent, so that it is
negligible. The relatively high degree of polarization for component C
( The degrees of polarization for component C derived from our P maps are 14.9, 16.1 and 17.0%, respectively, at our three different frequency channels, in order of increasing frequency. The two redundant measurements for 8.52 GHz (for IF34 and IF56) differ by only 0.2%, suggesting that this apparent decrease in degree of polarization with decrease in frequency may be real. In contrast, the corresponding three m values for component B are 16.6, 16.2, and 16.4%, so that they do not show any dependence on frequency. If the 2% drop in m across our entire bandwidth for component C is real, this could represent depolarization due to thermal plasma in the emitting region of the synchrotron radiation. This could reflect mixing of the jet material with the thermal plasma of the cloud with which C is colliding. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: March 18, 1999 ![]() |