![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 344, 639-646 (1999) 4. Understanding the P-T planeTo understand the behavior of the solution in the P-T plane
described in Figs. (1, 3) we define the following time scales: The
viscous heating time scale where Finally the hydrodynamic time scale is It is easy to see that and Thus Let us draw now the following curves in the P-T plane: and It is instructive to examine the behavior of a mass element in the P-T plane from the point of view of the ratio between the various time scales. For this reason we redraw Fig. 1 and incorporate in it the relevant time scales. The curves marked with Jn are the thermal balance condition for the relevant J. Consider a mass element at point A in Fig. 3. Since the
hydrodynamic time is the shortest, the element wants to expand.
However, the cooling time is shorter than the viscous heating time,
and hence the element will move to lower pressures and lower
temperatures. The motion will continue until the element will reach
the thermal equilibrium line (lines marked by Jn in Fig. 2)
appropriate for its conditions. The movement of an element at point B
is in the opposite direction, and it will reach the thermal
equilibrium line from the other side. This behavior can exist as long
as
At this point we can return and examine the disc structure which
penetrates into the region of point C. The part of the structure from
point A (cf. Fig. 3) to point The minimal pressure The disc models calculated by SW were calculated in this limit. When We can use our calculations to roughly estimate the critical mass
transfer rate below which we expect a hole to develop at some radius
or, for sufficiently high point in the disc, where
where f depends on the nature of the inner boundary
condition. Assuming The pressure at the critical point is given by For the particular case of free-free opacity we obtain the following expressions. and hence The total wind mass loss rate outside a given radius
where we have assumed that the outer radius of the disc is much
larger than the radius at which the inner boundary conditions should
be imposed. (Note that The specific mass loss rate (and of course also the integrated mass
loss rate) increases as the inner radius decreases. For certain
conditions it is possible that the wind mass loss rate will equal the
mass transfer rate into the disc before the stellar surface is
reached. Under these circumstances, a hole may develop in the inner
regions of the disc. The radius of this hole can be obtained from the
condition The above estimates indicate that for a typical BHSXT of mass
We can make similar estimates for the white dwarf and the AGN black hole cases, but here more careful attention will need to be paid to the nature and details of the opacity. The estimates based on free-free opacity are likely to be appropriate only for restricted regions of CV and AGN discs. The above results imply that in general, for very low
The extreme sensitivity of the radius of the hole to the value of
How far will the material go? From observation of Fig. 2 one can
conclude that the material will expand in the P-T plane for ever.
However, the matter loses angular momentum via the dissipation that
heats it. At the same time, as z increases the effective
gravitational acceleration increases for a while and then decreases.
It is not clear a priori which one wins. If the loss of angular
momentum is the larger, then as the matter move up it moves inward.
When the matter will reach radial motion there will be no more viscous
heating and the thermal instability will die away. On the other hand,
if the loss of angular momentum is minimal the matter will move
outward. It is instructive to consider the energy balance. The
gravitational energy released by the matter as it moves a distance
while the energy dissipated in this ring is A necessary but not sufficient condition for a wind is that the
dissipation inside the ring a condition which is satisfied only for
Our estimates of the wind expansion ignores many effects like radiation pressure, radiation pressure in lines etc. It seems therefore that the present estimate is a lower limit to the actual phenomenon. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: March 18, 1999 ![]() |