SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 345, L5-L8 (1999)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

2. Observations and data reduction

The 1.3 cm continuum and H2O maser (616[FORMULA]523; [FORMULA] = 22235.080 MHz) observations were made with the VLA of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) 1 in the A configuration on 1998 May 14 and 21. We observed simultaneously two different bandwidths of 25 MHz (7 channels of 3.125 MHz each) and 3.125 MHz (63 channels of 48.8 kHz each), respectively. Both the right and left circular polarizations were sampled in the two different bandwidths. The broad bandwidth was centered at the frequency of 22285.080 MHz for continuum measurements, while the narrow bandwidth was centered at the frequency of the H2O 616[FORMULA]523 maser line (22235.080 MHz) with [FORMULA] = -69.0 km s-1. The absolute amplitude calibrator was 1331+305 and the phase calibrator was 1733-130, both names in the J2000 coordinate system. The bootstrapped flux densities of 1733-130 were found to be 3.71[FORMULA]0.06 and 3.79[FORMULA]0.08 Jy, for 1998 May 14 and 21, respectively. Once the strongest H2O maser component was identified in a particular spectral channel of the narrow bandwidth (the channel at [FORMULA] = -61.1 km s-1), we self-calibrated its signal in phase and amplitude. The self-calibration procedure on the first day was initiated with a point source model, whose position was that of the strongest maser component. To measure it, we used the AIPS task MAXFIT on the corresponding channel map externally calibrated with 1331+305 and 1733-130. The phase and amplitude corrections finally obtained were then applied (as cross-calibration) to both the narrow and broad bandwidth data. To better align the positions of both days of observation, we used another cross-calibration procedure for the second day, i.e, taking the self-calibration phase solution of the 1998 May 14 as the first self-calibration model for 1998 May 21. For more details of the system parameters and calibration procedures see Torrelles et al. (1996).

In order to study the continuum emission with maximum sensitivity, we produced a map with the task IMAGR of AIPS and the "robustness" parameter set to 5 (Briggs 1995), equivalent to natural weighting. The resulting angular resolution was [FORMULA]0[FORMULA] 1 and the map is shown in Fig. 1.

[FIGURE] Fig. 1. 1.3 cm continuum contour map of the thermal jet in IRAS 18162-2042. Levels are -3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 times 0.11 mJy beam-1, the rms noise of the map. The half power contour of the beam ([FORMULA]; PA = [FORMULA]) is shown in the bottom right corner.

With regard to the H2O maser emission, individual spectral channel maps (63 channels of 0.66 km s-1 each) were produced with the same weighting of the (u,v) data as for the continuum. The spectrum observed in 1998 May 14 is shown in Fig. 2. The uncertainty in the relative positions between the masers spots is dominated by the noise statistics and can be estimated (e.g., Meehan et al. 1998) to be [FORMULA] = (beam size)/(2[FORMULA]signal-to-noise ratio). These relative uncertainties turn out to be in the range of a few mas. In Fig. 3 we show the relative positions of the water masers spots for 1998 May 14.

[FIGURE] Fig. 2. Spectrum of the H2O maser emission on 1998 May 14.

[FIGURE] Fig. 3. Map showing the positions of the H2O masers (crosses) in the region with respect to the brightest spot in 1998 May 14 (with [FORMULA] km s-1). The position of this reference spot is [FORMULA]; [FORMULA], as measured with the AIPS task MAXFIT. The [FORMULA] of each spot is shown next to it. The size of the crosses reflects the uncertainty in the relative positions between maser spots, estimated as the beam size over twice the signal-to-noise ratio (see text).

On the other hand the accuracy of the absolute positions of both continuum and masers depends on the accuracy of the position of the phase calibrator, and is estimated to be [FORMULA] 0[FORMULA] 05.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999

Online publication: April 12, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de