![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 346, 91-100 (1999) 4. ConclusionsWe have modeled the evolution of binary systems using a Monte Carlo code. The results of the simulations are consistent with the results of other codes (Portegies Zwart & Yungelson, 1998; Lipunov et al., 1997; Portegies Zwart & Verbunt, 1996). Using this code we find that the merger rate of compact object binaries and consequently the detection rate in gravitational wave detectors falls approximately exponentially with the width of kick velocity distribution. While the code that we use is far from describing all the details of binary stellar evolution we must emphasize that it produces similar results to the ones obtained elsewhere and in this work we only concentrate on the relative scaling of the resultant merger rate with the kick velocity in a supernova explosion. The exact shape of the kick velocity distribution is very difficult
to measure. Cordes & Chernoff (1997) and Bethe & Brown (1998)
use a distribution which is a weighted sum of two Gaussian
distributions: 80 percent with the width 175 km s-1, 20
percent with 700 km s-1; Portegies Zwart & Spreeuw
(1996) use a Gaussian with the width of 450 km s-1. On the
other hand Iben & Tutukov (1996) argue that no velocity kicks are
required at all, however the lack of pulsars in wide binaries suggests
that at least a small kick of a few tens of km s-1 must be
present (Portegies Zwart et al., 1997). Thus, the velocity kick
determination remains uncertain. Consequently the detection rate
estimates in gravitational wave detectors may be uncertain by this
amount. Approximating the kick velocity distribution by a single
Gaussian profile and changing its dispersion, we calculated the merger
rate for a wide range of velocity kicks. Changing the width of the
assumed profile within the values proposed by other authors, namely
from The measurements of gravitational wave signals may thus allow some
determination of the kick velocities. The rates and also perhaps
measurements of the "chirp" masses,
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: May 6, 1999 ![]() |