![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 346, 285-294 (1999) 5. Data analysis and results5.1. Methods and correctionsAll data were decompressed to reverse the onboard compression scheme. Given the extreme accuracy we ultimately want to achieve, many correction and calibration procedures have to be applied. Basically, two approaches can be used to correct for possible instrument biases: We can either employ external information, such as a detector flat field to correct intensities or a detector grid image to correct geometric distortions, or exploit the data itself to estimate and correct the effective biases of the parameters. We will use here the second approach, but, whenever possible, a verification with additional information will be performed. In the first approach, a flat-field removal would correct the measured counts with a known detector sensitivity bias factor before calculating the line and continuum parameters. In the second approach, the influence of the detector bias is treated as a "black box"; its effect is estimated afterwards by evaluating the whole raster. For instance, the flat-field fluctuations were removed by correcting for sinusoidal variations of different periodicities, which can be observed in averages over the whole extension of the east-west raster. An exposure of the detector at a raster step
Let
The determination of the detector curvature needed to correct the
effect of the geometric distortion on the position of the
Ne VIII line in the spectral regime was obtained with
the help of September 22, 1996 data, because this raster covered a
rather uniform area on the disk, i.e., without any possible bias from
coronal hole or limb portions justifying the assumption that each
spatial pixel along the slit should have seen similar regions of the
Sun across the raster scan. The line position as a function of the
spatial pixel is estimated by averaging the line centroids (obtained
as outlined above) across the raster (i.e., the 83 exposures in the
western portion) and is plotted in Fig. 6. Also shown is the spectral
correction function resulting from the standard SUMER detector
distortion correction (Moran 1997). The range of its application is
recommended to be from pixel 19 to 339 in the spatial regime of
Fig. 6, which shows detector pixel numbers in reversed order (0:
south; 359: north). Within these limits, both detector corrections do
not differ by more than
The temporal variations, due to thermal influences (heater cycle and temperature drifts), have then been subtracted. They have been estimated by averaging the residual line centroid positions (i.e., after the detector correction) across the north-south extension of the slit. (They have been shown in Fig. 1). The Doppler shift induced by the solar rotation speed of 2 km s-1 at the equatorial limb has been taken into account by calculating the LOS velocities for all pixels as a function of their nominal mapping onto the solar disk. Without this correction a clear solar rotation signal would be discernible demonstrating the velocity sensitivity of SUMER (see also Fig. 5 of Peter 1998). All these corrections are, however, not sufficient to deduce absolute line positions, because there may be systematic line shifts on the disk (solar effects), and because the wavelength positions on the detector may have moved between the observations (detector effects). 5.2. Absolute wavelength calibrationFor an absolute wavelength calibration, an extended spectral window
is required around Ne VIII (in second order) containing
cool chromospheric UV lines (in first order). It can reasonably be
assumed that these lines have no or very small solar Doppler shifts
(Hassler et al. 1991; Brekke et al. 1997; Chae et al. 1998). The
method for the detector curvature correction in the spectral regime
along the slit as described above (cf., Fig. 6) is only suitable for
single lines and has to be modified for a wide spectral window. To
achieve this, the distortion correction will be performed in such a
way that the average correction is close to zero. We selected an
interval of 62 spatial pixels (approximately
For an identification of the numerous cold lines, a crude
wavelength scale was first established for the mid-latitude scan on
September 22 by fitting literature wavelengths of the peaks of the
prominent lines Si II
( With the help of our preliminary wavelength scale, in a second step, 51 cold lines or line blends could be identified in the same data set. In the case of line blends, the expected wavelength was calculated as the average nominal position of the lines involved, weighted with their literature intensities. The pixel positions were fitted against the literature or expected wavelengths in a third-order polynominal fit, under the assumption that the pixel size is a quadratic function of the detector position. The result is a pixel size between 41.6 mÅ and 42.6 mÅ, with the maximum close to the middle of the detector. The differences between expected and observed wavelengths of the lines have always been smaller than 21 mÅ or 0.5 pixel and the standard deviation is 10 mÅ or 0.25 pixel. The uncertainty estimate given by the fitting routine for the wavelength range around 1540 Å is better than 3 mÅ. This defines a wavelength scale with variable pixel size against which the measured intensities can be plotted. In a third step, we have to determine the wavelength offset which might be present between both days. The synthetic spectrum constructed in Sect. 2 and the spectra observed on September 21 and 22 in our selected spatial interval of 62 pixels (with the wavelength scale defined above for the second day) have therefore been compared by a cross-correlation analysis in the wavelength range from 1538.16 Å to 1543.28 Å. For this analysis, the interval containing the Ne VIII line in second order obviously has to be excluded (from 1540.38 Å to 1541.23 Å). The corresponding spectra are shown in Fig. 7. The highest correlation coefficient of the left portion of the spectrum of September 21 is 0.80 and of the right portion 0.98 (with a mean displacement of + 13 mÅ). The corresponding coefficients for the September 22 raster are 0.49 and 0.97, respectively, so only the shift corresponding to the right interval (+ 1 mÅ, thus essentially verifying the wavelength scale obtained in the second step) is taken into account. Consequently, both wavelength scales have been adjusted by a relative shift of 12 mÅ.
After applying these procedures, we have specified a wavelength for
each spectral pixel of the detector transmitted on September 21 and
22, and thus the wavelengths for the pixels selected around the
Ne VIII line ( 5.3. Doppler shifts and rest wavelength of Ne VIII (
|
![]() |
Fig. 8. Average line shifts of the Ne VIII (![]() |
Table 1. Wavelengths obtained for Ne VIII (770) from mean line positions on concentric circles and the resulting LOS speeds (cf., Fig. 8)
With the assumptions of zero Doppler shift of
Ne VIII in the off-limb corona and no average shift of
the atomic lines, we find a rest wavelength for the line
Ne VIII ( -
) of 770.428 Å. The line
is then shifted predominantly towards blue in the other regions. By
considering the uncertainties of the fit routines, which give
3 mÅ, and taking into account the Gaussian fit and
cross-correlation results as well as the uncertainties of the atomic
line data, we estimate an overall uncertainty level of 6 mÅ
(1
) for our wavelength
determinations in first order, or 3 mÅ
(1
) in second order.
The average wavelength measured on the disk (770.426 Å) would indicate a redshift of 6.6 km s-1 if the old literature wavelength of 770.409 Å is assumed. This is, indeed, consistent with the results obtained by Brekke et al. (1997) and Chae et al. (1998).
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: May 6, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de