![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 346, 397-406 (1999) 2. Observations and data reductionThe VLBI observations used an array consisting of the
VLBA 1 and
Effelsberg 2,
Medicina and
Noto 3 at 22 GHz,
while the stand-alone VLBA was used at 43 GHz. Five sets of
observations were made from December 1992 to January 1993 at roughly
10 day intervals. Data were recorded on Mark IIIA compatible
terminals, in Mode E (14 MHz bandwidth). Typically, each scan had
lasted 13 minutes. The data were correlated at the Array Operations
Centre in Socorro, New Mexico. The correlator output was calibrated in
amplitude and phase using
The amplitude calibration of VLBI observations at 22 GHz and 43 GHz, is mainly limited by the lack of point source calibrators. System Temperature measurements were made at the end of each scan and the gain curve of each telescope was used to correct the variation of effective antenna gain with antenna elevation for all telescopes. The calibration accuracy differs between observing sessions, owing to different weather conditions. (Millimetric observations are sensitive to the water vapor content of the atmosphere.) Images were made for each `calibrator' source scheduled for a few
scans during the observing program, namely 0804+499 and 1611+343 at
22 GHz, OJ 287 and BL Lac at 43 GHz. From an inspection of the
visibility plots, it appears that these sources were barely resolved
with the array and are therefore reasonable calibrators. The poor
uv -plane coverage ( The self-calibration procedure, which uses closure amplitudes to
determine telescope amplitude corrections, gave calibration factors
that are within 10% of unity. Total power measurements, contemporary
with the VLBI observations, were not available for the calibrators.
These sources are known to be highly variable with time at high
frequencies. Light curves at 22 GHz for 1611+343 and OJ 287 can be
found in Tornikoski et al. (1994). The ratio between our extrapolated
`zero baseline' flux density and the total power flux density is
The total correlated flux density for 3C 273 at both frequencies is
about one half of the total power measurements with single dish.
However, correlated flux and total power flux follow a similar trend
(see, for example von Montigny et al. 1997). More recent 22 GHz VLBA
observations by Leppänen et al. (1995) do show a similar ratio.
In conclusion we estimate that the systematic amplitude calibration
errors for any of the data sets are
During session four (14 January 1993), the array was so heavily affected by adverse weather conditions that only crude images could be made. Data from that session will not be used in the following discussions. Table 1 summarizes the observational data and imaging. Column 1: project name; Column 2: date of the observation; Column 3: observing frequency; Column 4: stations; Column 5: beam major axis; Column 6: beam minor axis; Column 7: major axis Position Angle; Column 8: dynamic range, i.e. the ratio between the peak flux density and the rms noise in the image, measured far from the source of emission. Table 1. VLBI observations of 3C 273.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: May 21, 1999 ![]() |