 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 346, 769-777 (1999)
4. Discussion
Degree of ionization. As discussed in Sect. 3.1, bar H ii
region spectra do not exhibit any obvious signs of high-velocity
shocks or hard UV radiation. However, there is marginal evidence from
Figs. 2 and 3 that the ionization might be different for some bar
regions. The degree of ionization at a specific position in a nebula
can be accessed through the ionization parameter:
![[EQUATION]](img68.gif)
where is the number of ionizing
photons per unit time by the central source, r is the position
in the nebula, and c the speed of light (Osterbrock 1989). The
most obvious evidence that bar regions are different from disc regions
is seen in the [O i] 6300 line. As
described in Evans & Dopita (1985), the [O i] line is emitted in
the transition zone of an H ii region which contains a significant
fraction of neutral hydrogen. The line is then stronger when U
is lower (or the ionizing stellar temperature is lower). Since we have
detected the [O i] line in a much larger fraction of bar regions than
in disc regions, this suggests that the ionization parameter could be
lower in the former population. Fig. 9 shows the correlation between
[O i] 6300/[O iii]
5007 and [O ii]
3727/[O iii]
5007 which is particularly dependent
on U (Evans & Dopita 1985). A correction for the
interstellar extinction has been applied to these line ratios. The
bulk of bar H ii regions is located at
. For the disc regions, the scatter
is quite large but on average ,
larger than the value for bar regions. Unfortunately, our sample is
not large enough to firmly confirm that U is indeed different
for both populations of H ii regions.
![[FIGURE]](img80.gif) |
Fig. 9. Diagnostic diagram showing the relation between the [O i] 6300/[O iii] 5007 and [O ii] 3727/[O iii] 5007 nebular line ratios. Both ratios have been corrected for the extinction. The curves represent models from Evans & Dopita (1985). The horizontal dashed lines show three values for U, 0.03, 0.003, and 0.0003. The vertical lines indicate the stellar temperatures used in the models, 50 000 K, 40 000 K and 37 000 K.
|
If a difference in the ionization parameter is really present, this
could be due to many factors: differences in the initial mass
function, age, richness of the OB associations, or spatial
distribution of the ionized material (Evans & Dopita 1985). As
recently shown by Rozas et al. (1999), the luminosity function (LF) of
the bar regions is much less regular than the LF of the disc regions
in the strongly barred spiral NGC 7479. Their result, combined with
our study on the nebular excitation, suggest strongly that the
properties of the OB associations formed in bars differ from the
normal associations of the disc. More work comparing LFs and nebular
properties of a larger sample of bar and disc regions would allow us
to investigate the origin of this difference. In the final paper in
this series (Friedli & Martin, in preparation), we will also
examine the properties of the clusters formed in diverse bar
environments with high-spatial numerical simulations.
Mixing and element production. The estimated timescale given
by numerical simulations for which the star formation activity phase
lasts in bars is yr (Martin &
Friedli 1997). How does this compare with mixing timescale?
It is possible to roughly quantitatively evaluate the timescale of
mixing of the ISM due to radial flows. Roy & Kunth (1995) have
discussed the diverse mixing mechanisms of the oxygen abundance in the
ISM in galaxy discs. Assuming a pure radial mixing due to gas flows
funnelled in the bar, the upper limit for the time for gas to diffuse
a length scale, , in the radial
direction is:
![[EQUATION]](img84.gif)
where v is the radial flow velocity, and l is the
mean free path for molecular clouds. In a typical bar,
kpc (see Table 1) and
km s-1. The value of the
mean free path for the gas clouds is not a well-defined quantity in
bars. In galaxy discs, pc (Roberts
& Hausman 1984; Roy & Kunth 1995). If we assume
pc for bars, we find
yr. However, since radial flows in
bars are not stationary, the real mixing timescale could be even of
the order of , i.e.
yr. Putting all this together yields
the following reasonable interval for the mixing timescale:
yr. Thus,
is shorter than
meaning that the abundance content
in H ii regions formed during this phase must be homogenized.
It is also instructive to make rough (i.e. close-box) estimates of
the global abundance increase during
as well as of the abundance fluctuations in H ii regions which should
result from their age spread. If is
the initial mean gaseous abundance in the bar region,
the global star formation
efficiency, and the net yield for
the species considered, then the final mean abundance is given by:
![[EQUATION]](img98.gif)
Interestingly enough, does not
depend on the initial gas mass fraction. For instance, for the oxygen
with an yield , an initial solar
abundance , and a typical SF
efficiency , then
. The global increase of oxygen
abundance is thus only about 0.1 dex. Eq. 3 can in fact also be
applied to each individual H ii regions with exactly the same numbers;
the fluctuations in the oxygen abundance are thus expected to be of
the order 0.1 dex, which is indeed what is observed (Sect. 3.5).
However, we do not observe any clear trend between the age and
metallicity for bar H ii regions. In dwarf galaxies, the metal
enrichment of H ii is not observed and metals are probably locked in
the hot phase. (see e.g. Tenorio-Tagle 1996; Kobulnicky 1998). The
situation could be similar for star forming regions in bars.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: June 17, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |