Astron. Astrophys. 347, 169-177 (1999)
3. Preliminary analysis of the nebula spectra
Because of the low surface brightness of the nebulae and their
large angular diameters, spectral information on the nebulae is still
rather unsatisfactory: though all objects were observed by Stenholm
for the catalogue of Acker et al. (1992), the
aperture was usually placed on a
bright portion, and thus is neither representative for the object as a
whole nor sufficient to allow reasonable photoionization modeling.
Three objects (PNe G231.8+04.1, G277.1-03.8, and G283.6+25.3) were
observed by Kingsburgh & Barlow (1992) with a 18" long slit
centered on the CS and analyzed by plasma diagnostics for their
chemical compositions.
Therefore, we limit ourselves to an overall test whether the nebula
spectra and data are consistent with the properties found for the
CSPN. We deduce how many hydrogen recombinations take place in the
shell and what must be the minimum luminosity for a central star to
ionize it, and how this agrees with the one derived from the
atmospheric analysis of the CS. Nebulae which require low stellar
luminosities must be substantially optically thin in the hydrogen
Lyman continuum which implies that the nebula spectra should be
dominated by high stages of ionization.
We assume a spherical, homogeneous, and isothermal nebula of
density n and electron temperature
at a distance d. Given the
angular diameter (in arc sec) D, the measured
H -flux
), and the interstellar extinction
c, one obtains a relation between nebula density and distance:
![[EQUATION]](img78.gif)
with the effective recombination coefficient
for the
H line (cf. Osterbrock 1974). We set
, which suffices for the estimates we
want to do here. This relation we use to get an estimate for either
n or d from the other quantity. For some objects the
electron density can be derived from the [S
II Å line ratio, for
others we have available the distance on the basis of the CSPN
analysis.
Then the number of recombinations
is
![[EQUATION]](img83.gif)
with the total recombination coefficient
for hydrogen. As the nebulae are
most likely optically thin, we should use
. An average electron temperature of
20 kK is used, as appropriate for high excitation objects.
Table 3 summarizes our results: we give for each object the
adopted data. the number of hydrogen recombinations, and the
luminosity for a CSPN at kK to
ionize the nebula, if it were optically thick. The latter figure is
quite insensitive to the adopted value of
in this temperature range. In some
objects, we give several results based on fixing either the distance
or the density. It is worth pointing out that given the distance, one
has
![[EQUATION]](img101.gif)
so depends strongly on d
but only weakly on . But with a given
density
![[EQUATION]](img102.gif)
one notes an extremely strong sensitivity to the angular diameter,
and also strong dependences on the flux and electron temperature.
Therefore, guessing a reasonable distance gives more reliable results
than depending on an uncertain estimate for the electron density.
Table 3 shows that the resultant densities all are in the range
of as one would expect for highly
evolved nebulae.
![[TABLE]](img100.gif)
Table 3. Analysis of the nebular spectra: given are the H fluxes (in ) (Acker et al. 1992 except for G249.3-05.4 which was estimated from Stenholm's measured flux), used angular diameter, extinction derived from the Balmer lines, adopted electron density (cm-3) and distance (values in brackets are derived from Eq. 1) the number of H recombinations (sec-1) in the nebula, the necessary minimum luminosity (in ) for a CSPN with , the luminosity derived from our photospheric analysis, and the He II and [O III ] line intensities (I(H )=100) from the spectra of Stenholm (S, normal exposure time 10 min., for faint objects, in a few case, longer exposures were done) or Kingsburgh & Barlow (KB).
Notes:
a: exposure time 30 min, no He II
b: exposure time 40 min, no He II
c: exposure time 30 min, no He II , H very faint
d: exposure time 10 min, He II visible, but uncertain 20:
Let us discuss first the nebulae with circular or elliptical
nebulae. PNe G214.9+07.8, G283.6+25.3, and G293.6+10.9 all require a
stellar luminosity smaller than is obtained from the CSPN analysis.
Thus all are substantially optically thin in the hydrogen Lyman
continuum. The nebula spectra are consistent with this: PN G214.9+07.8
has a He II Å line as
strong as H while the [O III ] line
is rather weak. This nebula thus is probably optically thin in the He
II Lyman continuum as well, like e.g. K 1-27 (Rauch et al. 1994).
PN G283.6+25.3 is not so extreme an object with a smaller difference
in luminosities, and a lower excitation spectrum (from Kingsburgh
& Barlow 1992). The moderate [O III ] intensity is also found in
Stenholm's spectrum which lack any indication for He II . Since in all
three objects with spectra from both sources one notes that Stenholm's
spectra always give lower or absent He II lines, it is most likely
that Stenholm's smaller aperture was placed at some bright
condensation of lower excitation. Finally, PN G293.6+10.9 shows [O III
] typical for high excitation objects, but lacking He II because of
the reasons just mentioned.
The other elliptical nebulae also tend to have quite low required
stellar luminosities, and nebula spectra characteristic of high
excitation, optically thin nebulae: PN G249.3-05.4 has rather strong
[O III ] lines (but no He II) in Stenholm's spectrum, which implies
that it might be only moderately optically thin; this would be in
accordance with the somewhat high lower limit of 1700
for the CS. PNe G253.5+10.7 and
G324.1+09.0 must be extremely optically thin: the very low required
stellar luminosity as well as the very strong He II but fairly weak [O
III ] lines clearly indicate this.
There seems to be one exceptional object among the circular
nebulae: PN G231.8+04.1 requires about ten times as many ionizing
photons as its analyzed CSPN can provide. The nebula spectra are
indicative for an optically thin high excitation object (though
Stenholm's spectrum probably underestimates the He II line, as
before). Critical inspection of the data of this object has not
revealed any obvious cause for the seemingly high nebular luminosity.
We therefore consider this object to be included in further
studies.
The amorphous nebula PN G257.5+00.6 would be rather similar to the
elliptical PN G253.5+10.7, if only Stenholm's spectrum would not lack
the He II . A clarification must avait the analysis of a good quality
long slit spectrum.
Finally, the large, bipolar PN G277.1-03.8 is difficult to analyze
in our simple fashion, as the determination of a characteristic
angular diameter is not without problems. Thus, the required stellar
luminosity cannot be reliably constrained. Stenholm's spectrum would
indicate a optically thin high excitation object similar to the
circular nebulae discussed above. However, the spectrum of KB is
somewhat unusual, in that He II is 1.5 times stronger than
H which indicates a nebula not only
optically thin in the He II Lyman continuum but also with a high
helium abundance. The former would be difficult to reconcile with the
rather strong [O III ] lines. Preliminary attempts to interpret this
object with (spherical) photoionization models have so far failed to
give even a roughly satisfactory reproduction of the spectrum.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: June 18, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |