![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 347, 258-265 (1999) 4. Emission and absorption from molecular gas seen near the Cassiopeia A SNRFig. 3 shows 12CO J=2-1 and 13CO J=1-0
spectra averaged over the face of the nebula. The well-known
separation into local gas near 0-velocity and Perseus Arm material is
obvious. The local gas has a blended, red-shifted wing which is weaker
in CO emission but stronger in HCO+ absorption (Liszt &
Lucas, 1995) as seen in Figs. 6 and 7. Emission from the local gas is
so uniform that displaying a map is not worthwhile. Averaged over the
nebula, the statistics of its CO J=2-1 emission are
CO emission from the Perseus Arm gas occurs in three features whose
relative spatial positions are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The most highly
blue-shifted gas appears in an interesting filamentary structure to
the southeast, while the most red-shifted gas appears to the east and
west alike. The intermediate-velocity material appears mainly to the
west and the northernmost edges of the nebula are relatively free of
strong emission. Statistics of the Perseus Arm J=2-1 CO emission
averaged over the face of the nebula are
4.1. Using the Cassiopeia A SNR as a background source at mm-wavelengthsAs mentioned in Paper I and in the Introduction here, the physical conditions in the clouds seen toward Cassiopeia are such that the expected emission brightnesses of molecules like HCO+ and HCN, small though they might be, are not negligible compared to the weak radiocontinuum emission. In Paper I we argued that the existence of HCO+ absorption profiles toward Cassiopeia is something of a coincidence because their expected depths are not a monotonic function of their opacity. Excitation via photon-trapping is important in the moderate density regime in which the lines are formed, so line brightnesses increase (and absorption depths decrease) with increasing opacity over the expected range of parameter space. To show this effect directly, we took emission profiles of various species on and off the nebula at positions marked by crosses in Fig. 4. At the three more easterly positions (Fig. 6), the stronger portions of the continuum shell are only barely occulted; the darkest, densest gas is seen off the face of the nebula. There is no appreciable continuum at the two lower positions and all species appear in emission, including HCO+. The peak brightness of the HCO+ off the nebula is 0.15-0.25 K, comparable to the brightness of the radio shell, as expected from the discussion in Paper I. No HCO+ emission is seen from any of the local gas which clearly is of much lower hydrogen column density.
The Perseus Arm gas has progressively lower column density to the north in Fig. 6 and its 13CO/C18O intensity ratios at the three positions are 14, 21, and 45; the northernmost position obviously has fairly low extinction. But at this position there is a curious pattern to all of the HCO+ profiles. For the Perseus Arm gas, it is the -37 km s-1 feature which appears in absorption while the much stronger -47 km s-1 emission lines have no counterpart. For the local gas, it is the more weakly CO-emitting, blue-shifted wing which is stronger in HCO+ absorption, as we discussed in Paper I. Because the -47 km s-1 gas is known to occult the
continuum (Goss et al., 1984) its absence in absorption cannot be
explained geometrically. Another explanation would be to suppose that
N(HCO+) declines as N(CO) and
N( Profiles from the two more westerly positions marked in Fig. 4 are
shown in Fig. 7. There, CO emission from the Perseus Arm is slightly
stronger toward the nebula (
The -47 km s-1 feature appears the most strongly in HCO+ emission on both sides of the nebula and is obviously the denser gas, even to the West where its weak 13CO emission and high 12CO/13CO intensity ratio indicate that N(CO)/N(C+) and AV are relatively small. In Fig. 5, the width of the HCO+ emission at -47 km s-1 is intermediate between those of 12CO and 13CO, and noticeably greater than that of the C18O. The -37 km s-1 gas is stronger in 13CO to the West and presumably opaque to optical radiation (owing to its small 12CO/13CO intensity ratio) but seems no denser, given the weakness of its HCO+ emission. 4.2. Is the Cassiopeia A SNR interacting with ambient molecular gas?The higher than normal kinetic temperature derived for some molecular gas (Wilson et al., 1993) and a variety of behaviour near the brightest western portion of the continuum shell (Anderson & Rudnick, 1996; Keohane et al., 1996) have led to the conjecture that the Cassiopeia A SNR may be interacting with the ambient molecular gas. Alternatively, the molecular gas might show the (presumably smaller) prior influence of the stellar system which was the SNR progenitor. The strongest and most direct indicators of an on-going interaction are absent. Koralesky et al. (1998) did not detect shock-excited 1720 MHz OH maser emission and our data show no sign of the 30-50 km s-1-wide CO lines which are often characteristic of such interaction (Frail & Mitchell, 1998). Of course the Cas A remnant is so young that these characteristic markers may simply not have had time to develop. Clearly, any warm gas occurs only near -47 km s-1 to the East and South of the nebula; there is no suggestion of elevated kinetic temperatures in the western regions sampled in Fig. 7, where an interaction was suggested. The warm gas is not particularly dense, as shown by the weakness of HCO+ in emission or and its linewidths are relatively small. None of the gas appears to have been highly compressed, as is apparent from earlier derivations of the density by Wilson et al. (1993), or from the weakness of HCO+ emission 13CO J=1-0 linewidths are larger to the west in the -38
km s-1 gas (FWHM = 4.3-4.5 km s-1 for
13CO in Fig. 7 The molecular gas frames the nebular continuum suggestively in Fig.
4 and there are suggestions of interesting kinematic structure in Fig.
5. For instance, in the frames at ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: June 18, 1999 ![]() |