![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 347, 424-433 (1999) 1. IntroductionThe cosmic X-ray background (XRB) above
The most popular synthesis models of the XRB are based on the so-called unification schemes for Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs), where the orientation of a molecular torus surrounding the nucleus determines the classification of the source. At a zeroth-order approximation level, sources observed along lines of sight free from the torus obscuration should have unabsorbed X-ray spectra and optical broad lines (type 1 AGNs), while sources seen through the torus should have absorbed X-ray spectra and appear as narrow line objects in the optical (type 2 AGNs, e.g. Seyfert 2 galaxies). In this framework type 2 AGNs provide a natural class of sources
with X-ray spectra flattened by absorption. The intrinsic X-ray
luminosity function (XLF) of type 2 objects is unknown and has been
usually assumed to be the same as the one derived for type 1s (e.g.
Boyle et al. 1993), apart from a normalization factor. The
cosmological evolution has also been taken identical for type 1s and
type 2s. Under these assumptions it has been shown that the broad band
3-100 keV spectrum of the XRB can be reproduced by an appropriate mix
of unabsorbed and absorbed AGNs (Matt & Fabian 1994; Madau et al.
1994; Comastri et al. 1995, hereafter Co95). The number ratio R
of type 2 to type 1 objects, as well as the distribution of the
absorbing column densities Very recently an additional set of observational constraints has
become available. Deep surveys from ROSAT have extended our knowledge
to the low luminosity part of the AGN XLF (Miyaji et al. 1999a,
hereafter Mi99a). Contrary to previous results (Boyle et al. 1993;
Page et al. 1996; Jones et al. 1997) a pure luminosity evolution (PLE)
of AGNs with redshift is no longer consistent with the data, and a
luminosity dependent density evolution (LDDE) is required. From the
X-ray data of an optically selected sample of Seyfert galaxies
Risaliti et al. (1999) have determined the
In the present paper we test the standard synthesis model to verify if it remains compatible with the new data. These data leave still some latitude to important parameters of the model, and various choices are possible to fit the XRB equally well. However, in all cases we find moderate but consistent evidence that at least some of the standard assumptions have to be relaxed: extra hard spectrum AGNs are needed at intermediate or high redshifts, in addition to those expected in the usual scenario. The additional sources could be analogous to local Seyfert 2s, if they evolve faster than type 1s, or they could be other astrophysical sources not yet enlisted among the contributors to the XRB. We discuss the observations which could distinguish between the alternatives. Throughout this paper the deceleration parameter and the Hubble
constant are given the values
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: June 30, 1999 ![]() |