![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 348, 71-76 (1999) 4. Discussion and conclusionThe hard X-ray radiation, coming from the center, can illuminate
the outer parts of the nonplanar disk, where optical emission lines
will be emitted as a result of reprocessing. Profiles of such lines
are modeled here (Fig. 4). Changing some basic parameters, such as the
hard X-ray luminosity Signatures of warped disk profiles can be seen in many objects (for instance 3C 227, Mkn 668, 3C 390.3, etc., Eracleous & Halpern 1994). It is possible that these objects contain an illuminated warped disk, but of course, other explanations can not be excluded. However, most of the AGN show symmetric profiles, without frequency shifts. On average, no more than roughly 10-15% of the broad line emission in AGN can be reproduced by an irradiated nonplanar disk. We note that this value is close to the covering factor of such a disk. One may conclude, therefore, that the bulk of the line emission in AGN arises from some more or less spherical or conical structure (a system of clouds or star atmospheres, a jet), with a covering factor which is close to unity, but not from a irradiated thin disk. In that case, the presence of an inclined disk structure will cause only asymmetry of lines or additional peaks, displaced in frequency from the main profile. There are several possibilities for objects where no such asymmetries or displaced peaks are observed.
Nevertheless, many objects reveal asymmetries and displaced peaks, which could be successfully reproduced by a warped accretion disk. These profiles depend strongly on the twisting structure, the illuminating source geometry and the line of sight to the observer. In principle they can be modeled with high signal-to-noise spectra of the object by varying the model parameters. Knowledge of the twisting structure may allow the determination of some very important characteristics of AGN, at first order the spin momentum of the black hole and the viscosity parameter of the accretion disk. Their determination by other methods is still unreliable. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: July 16, 1999 ![]() |