![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 348, 211-221 (1999) 3. Observations and data reductionThe observations were carried out with the ESO Coudé Echelle
Spectrometer (CES) in three different periods: October 22-27, 1992,
June 6-8, 1993, and February 5-9, 1995. In Oct. 92 and Feb. 95 the CAT
1.4m telescope was applied, whereas in June 93 the 3.6m telescope was
feeding the CES through a 35m long fiber and an image slicer
(D'Odorico et al. 1989). On all occasions the detector was a front
illuminated Ford Aerospace The main targets for the June 93 observations were some halo
turnoff stars, for which the results have been presented by Smith et
al. (1998) including a description of the reductions of the image
slicer observations. The Oct. 92 and Feb. 95 observations have been
reduced in much the same way. Subtraction of background, flat field
correction and extraction of spectra were performed with standard
tasks in IRAF. The wavelength calibration was based on 28 thorium
lines well distributed over the wavelength region (6676-6734 Å).
A second-order polynomial was adopted for the dispersion solution
resulting in a typical rms deviation from the fit of 0.0015 Å.
Furthermore, the FWHM of the thorium lines were measured and found to
vary by less than 4% along the spectrum. This near-constancy of the
instrument profile is important in connection with the determination
of instrumental and stellar line broadening from Fe I
lines near the LiI line. For the Oct. 92 and Feb. 95
observations the FWHM of the Th lines corresponds to a resolution of
Table 2 lists the number of observations and exposure times as distributed over the three periods. Note, that HR 3578 has been observed in all three periods and HR 8181 in two of them. The individual spectra show excellent agreement and have therefore been co-added to obtain the final spectra shown in Fig. 1 for the 6702-6710 Å region. These are the spectra used for the determination of the 6Li/7Li ratio, but in the case of HR 3578 we have also derived the ratio separately for each observing period in order to check for possible systematic differences.
Table 2. Number of observations and exposure times for the program stars ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: July 16, 1999 ![]() |