 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 348, L45-L48 (1999)
3. Application to observations
Fig. 1 summarizes the broadband ROSAT observations
of X-ray emission from 48 WN and 17 WC stars (data from Pollock
et al. 1995). Space does not permit a detailed explanation of
this data; however, for multiple observations, the plotted points are
averages. Measurements are shown only for stars that (a) are single or
single-lined spectroscopic binaries and (b) have detections in
contrast to upper limits. Errorbars are large, with only
detections not atypical, but within
the errors there are no systematic trends between
and
or .
Using a variance weighted averaging scheme, the
ROSAT X-ray luminosity (0.2-2.4 keV) for WN types is
erg/s and for WC types is
erg/s. Pollock (1987) reported on
EINSTEIN IPC broadband measurements (0.2-4.0 keV) of WR
stars, with luminosities of erg/s
for 16 single and single-lined binaries of low mass function and
erg/s for 9 single stars. The
EINSTEIN and ROSAT results are
marginally consistent.
From Eq. (9), the main contributors to
are the emission as characterized by
and
from the cooling function, and the
wind opacity as expressed in and the
relative abundances and
. Note that for complete ionization
in H-poor winds, the factor is
insensitive to the wind properties.
For the X-ray emission, the value of
is implicitly temperature dependent.
For example, if the hot gas were typically of
K, then most atoms would be
completely ionized, hence the cooling would be from Bremsstrahlung
losses and . It is difficult to
assess the value of in WC stars
relative to WN stars without knowing
, but if we assume the ionization and
excitation of the gas does not vary much between WN stars and WC stars
(i.e., is similar between the two
classes), and that is not
exceedingly large (i.e., not much greater than
K), then we may at least expect
that , which will provide an upper
limit to the ratio .
To estimate values of , we note
that the primary result of O stars evolving to WN stars is
to convert 4H He leaving the metals
essentially unchanged, implying .
This is not entirely true, since C and O are underabundant but N is
enhanced. However, the heavier atoms like S, Si, and Fe are not
changed. For WC stars the nucleosynthesis is more complicated;
however, the heavier ions of S, Si, and Fe are still not enhanced so
that if the X-ray line spectrum is dominated by these metals, then
. The influence of lighter ions such
as O, Mg, and Ne, which are enhanced by factors of order 200, 10, and
3 in WC stars as compared to WN stars, will tend to increase
. For the attentuation of X-rays by
the cool wind, the He and metals have comparable influence on the
opacity for the WN winds, but for WC winds, the effect of metals is
that of He owing to the large C and
O abundances.
The quantities needed to evaluate the ratio of
to
using the proportionality in Eq. (9) are listed in Table 1. We
used van der Hucht et al. (1986) as a guide for determining
typical WR wind abundances. In the WN case, the wind is assumed to be
entirely HeII in the cool wind (although the trace
metals are significant for the wind opacity). In the WC case, we
assumed a wind with 62% HeII , 25% CIII
, and 13% OIII . In both cases the hot gas is taken as
completely ionized. With these abundances, we find
, as compared to observed ratios of
2.9 from ROSAT and 4.1 from EINSTEIN .
The derived upper limit gives the correct trend with
, but exceeds the observed values by
factors of 4-5. Better knowledge of the hot gas temperature would
allow a more accurate assessment of .
Lines from Mg and other enhanced metals can contribute significantly
to the cooling function, so that a
few is not unreasonable and would lower the predicted upper limit to
near the observed values. Given the errors in both the data and our
approximations, our simple scaling analysis appears capable of
explaining the basic features of current X-ray data for single WR
stars.
![[TABLE]](img106.gif)
Table 1. Typical WN and WC star parameters.
Notes:
a) Number fractions of ions; from van der Hucht et al. (1986)
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: July 26, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |