SpringerLink
Forum Springer Astron. Astrophys.
Forum Whats New Search Orders


Astron. Astrophys. 349, L34-L36 (1999)

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

A massive re-processing of all Tycho observations, obtained with the Hipparcos satellite over 1989-1993, was undertaken recently in order to increase the number of astrometric and photometric reference stars (Hog 1998). As a major stage of this work, a data base of raw Tycho observations, i.e. photon counts, was established for the 2.5 million brightest stars. The Tycho instrument, in contrast to the Hipparcos main instrument, observed in two different passbands [FORMULA] and [FORMULA], somewhat similar to the Johnson B and V (ESA, 1997). One of the possible applications of the data base was a two-colour photometric solution for close Hipparcos double stars with separations 0.1 to 2.5 arcsec, which generally only have one-colour photometry in the Hipparcos Catalogue. More than [FORMULA] double and triple systems were resolved photometrically. The method employed and the results will be given elsewhere (Fabricius & Makarov 1999).

The quality of the [FORMULA] and [FORMULA] magnitudes is characterized by their formal standard errors, being mostly in the range 0.01 to 0.1 mag depending on the brightness, and systematic errors depending on separation. The latter were estimated from a comparison of the [FORMULA] magnitudes with the Hipparcos [FORMULA] magnitudes and found to be within 0.15 mag for separations above 0.3 arcsec.

As many of these Hipparcos stars have statistically reliable trigonometric parallaxes in the Hipparcos Catalogue, an observational HR diagram, that is [FORMULA] against [FORMULA] can be built up, where [FORMULA] is the absolute [FORMULA] magnitude. Such a diagram for some 2600 components of double and triple stars with separations 0.32 to 2.0 arcsec and [FORMULA] greater than 5.0 is given in Fig. 1, left panel. The parallaxes [FORMULA] and their standard errors [FORMULA] were taken from the Hipparcos Catalogue, Double and Multiple Systems Annex. The star HD 113001, marked with 3 in the right plot of Fig. 1 is also given, although [FORMULA] is only 1.1. The Hipparcos parallax [FORMULA] mas for it appears to be accurate enough despite the unusually big formal error, as follows from its position in the HR diagram and from a new astrometric analysis of the Hipparcos observations.

[FIGURE] Fig. 1. Observational HR diagram for 2600 components of close binary stars with statistically significant Hipparcos parallaxes ([FORMULA]) and angular separations 0.32 to 2.0 arcsec (left plot). On the right, the same HR diagram, but with only the four blue subluminous components left, and the location of 1000 bona fide single Hipparcos stars is indicated with small dots for comparison. The primary and secondary components of a binary are connected with a straight line. The following binaries are marked: 1. HD 39927. 2. HD 30187. 3. HD 113001. 4. HD 149499. Estimated formal errors of the colour are typically 0.1 to 0.2 mag for the faintest stars.

While most of the photometrically resolved components belong to the main sequence and red giant branch, there is a conspicuous small group of four very blue subluminous stars. They are situated in the domain of hot subdwarfs, more specifically sdO to white dwarf DO stars. The hot subdwarfs are the immediate progenitors of the white dwarfs, and show a variety of properties, depending e.g. on the helium abundance (Saffer & Liebert 1994). The hot subdwarfs are numbered 1 to 4 in the right part of Fig. 1, and their primary components are shown with respect to a `standard' HR diagram constructed from Hipparcos single stars. Two of them (1 and 2) are new candidate sdO stars, and the other two a known sdO star (3) and a DO white dwarf (4). Some astrometric and photometric data for the new sdO stars from Hipparcos and Tycho are given in Table 1.


[TABLE]

Table 1. Astrometric and photometric data for two visual binaries with hot dwarf secondary components discovered by Tycho photometry. The equatorial coordinates are given in the ICRS system (columns 3 and 4). Parallaxes and angular separations from the Hipparcos catalogue are given in columns 5 and 6. [FORMULA] magnitudes and [FORMULA] colours for primary (I) and secondary (II) components from the Tycho photometric solutions are given in columns 7 through 10. Estimated absolute magnitudes in [FORMULA] for the secondary components and their standard errors are given in column 11.


The four systems under discussion are:

1. HD 39927 B. A new candidate hot subdwarf. It is in all probability identical to the far-ultraviolet source observed by Schmidt & Carruthers(1993) listed as number 489. The measured instrumental magnitude at the effective wavelength 1519 Å was [FORMULA] mag. The main component of the binary is classified as an A2III star in the Simbad database. It may be noted that the star HD 39911 of spectral type A0 is situated [FORMULA] to the SW. Although it seems to match better the position of the UV source 489, the latter was determined with a great uncertainty of a few arcminutes. HD 39911 has the same distance and proper motion as HD 39927 according to Hipparcos, and is present in the Celescope catalogue of UV stars (Davis et al. 1973), but with no magnitudes determined, probably due to its faintness in the ultraviolet.

2. HD 30187 B. A new candidate hot subdwarf. It matches the far-ultraviolet source FAUST 586 (Bowyer et al. 1995) with the measured flux of 0.0028(8) photons/s/cm2/Å at the effective wavelength about 1650 Å. The main component of the binary is classified as an F5V star in the Simbad database.

3. HD 113001 B. A known sdO star in a visual binary system. It is listed by Heber 1991, as one of the only two hot subdwarfs known in visual binaries. It has a relatively rich record of spectroscopic and ultraviolet observations. The angular separation of the components from Hipparcos is 0.536 arcsec, and the parallax 4.05 mas. Judging from the Tycho data, the difference between the components in V is only 0.6 mag, which along with the larger separation, made it much easier to discover the blue component than in the case of the two previous stars. The Hipparcos parallax, despite its unusually large error of 4.0 mas, seems to be accurate enough. We attempted an astrometric solution for this star with the published Hipparcos transit data, and achieved a parallax of [FORMULA] mas. The main component of the binary is classified as an F2V star in the Simbad database.

4. HD 149499 B = WD 1634-573. A known DO white dwarf in a binary. With the Hipparcos parallax of 26.94 mas, it is by far the nearest white dwarf of its kind. The angular separation of the components from Hipparcos is 1.319 arcsec. The primary component is classified as a K0V star in the Simbad database.

Ulrich Heber wrote in 1991: "Hot subluminous stars in binary systems could provide an important tool for checking the evolutionary scenarios [FORMULA] since they possibly allow stellar masses to be determined. Visual binaries and eclipsing spectroscopic binaries are of utmost importance in this respect". The two discovered hot subdwarfs, HD 39927 B and HD 30187 B, if confirmed by ultraviolet spectroscopic observations, will meet perfectly this quest. Being at a distance of only 100 pc from the Sun, they should have orbital periods of about 100 years, which is approximately 10 times shorter than the orbital period of the previously known binary HD 113001. Already now, accurate positional observations could reveal an orbital motion with respect to the mean Hipparcos epoch of 1991.

Noteworthy, the other candidate hot subdwarf in a visual binary listed by Heber 1991, HD 17576 B, is also present in our photometric solution. But having a [FORMULA] colour of [FORMULA] mag and [FORMULA] mag, it seems to belong rather to the ordinary subdwarf stars.

Previous Section Next Section Title Page Table of Contents

© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999

Online publication: August 25, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de