Astron. Astrophys. 349, 685-690 (1999)
2. Weak electric field acceleration
The electron energy gain in the current sheet is defined by the
potential drop experienced by a particle:
![[EQUATION]](img8.gif)
Here is the electron Lorentz
factor, and e are the
electron mass and charge, and E is the electric field in the
sheet. Here and in what follows the relativistic case is studied,
, so the particle speed is set to the
speed of light c where possible. In the one-dimensional model,
the acceleration length , which is
the particle displacement along the electric field inside the sheet,
could be as large as the current sheet length
. It should be expected though that
the synchrotron energy losses will limit the acceleration length. The
synchrotron loss length scale for an electron moving perpendicular to
the magnetic field is equal to
![[EQUATION]](img14.gif)
where is the reconnecting
magnetic field.
It is likely that the electric field acceleration will produce
beams of electrons, possibly moving with an angle
with respect to the magnetic field
lines. In this case the energy loss rate will decrease by a factor of
, and the loss length will increase
by a factor of . Since the minimum
length given by Eq. (2) is already on the order of the jet length,
smaller synchrotron losses would be too weak to determine the
acceleration length. The reconnection geometry in Fig. 1 suggests that
the electrons are accelerated along the electric field
and perpendicular to the
reconnecting magnetic field outside
the current sheet, so that indeed
and the loss length is determined by Eq. (2). The influence of the
magnetic field inside the sheet on the particle motion is ignored in
the one-dimensional model.
![[FIGURE]](img30.gif) |
Fig. 1. Reconnecting current sheet dimensions (length , width w, thickness ) and the magnetic field projection on the xy plane. The reconnection electric field and the longitudinal magnetic field are along the z-axis. The acceleration length and the synchrotron length are also measured along the z-axis.
|
Postulating that and taking
G and
according to observations
(Meisenheimer et al. 1997), one obtains the electric field required in
the model
![[EQUATION]](img35.gif)
The large cm from Eq. (2)
requires the electric field to be very small. A conventional measure
of the field strength is the reconnection Alfvén Mach number
, where
is the inflow speed as measured by
the drift speed into the sheet,
cm s-1 is the
Alfvén speed, is the proton
mass, and n is the plasma density. Assuming
cm
gives , so reconnection is indeed
very slow.
The weak electric field model is an attractively simple approach to
the problem of electron acceleration in the jets by the DC electric
field. More importantly, it can be used to explicitly relate the
properties of the accelerated particles to the characteristics of the
energy release by virtue of magnetic reconnection (Lesch & Birk
1998). In spite of these advantages, the model has several unappealing
features. First, the energy release rate in a single current sheet is
very small. The Poynting flux into the current sheet determines its
luminosity
![[EQUATION]](img44.gif)
which is only erg s-1
if both the current sheet width w and its length
are assumed to be of order
kpc (cf. Lesch & Birk 1998).
Thus reconnection regions are
required to explain the highest observed power of about
erg s-1. An unknown
physical mechanism would have to produce multiple, densely packed
current sheets in the jet and to ensure the stability of such highly
filamented structure. It is not clear what could prevent violent
interaction of the multiple electric currents with each other. Second,
the acceleration length of order the total length of the current sheet
is hard to achieve since it would require a highly symmetric
configuration of the fields, which is problematic given the postulated
highly filamentary magnetic field. Moreover, assuming that the average
leads to a contradiction.
Allowing for the possibility that the acceleration length is
different for different particles, let us introduce the average value
. The next section will show that
this possibility is realized in reconnecting current sheets with a
nonzero magnetic field. In any case, since the magnetic field energy
is converted into the particle kinetic energy in the sheet, the
Poynting flux in Eq. (4) should be equal to the product of the
particle influx to the sheet, , and
the average particle energy gain, .
Equating the product of these two quantities to the Poynting flux
gives the following self-consistency relation:
![[EQUATION]](img52.gif)
(Alfvén 1968; Vasyliunas 1980). Using
statvolt/cm together with the
previous values for and n
gives . Self-consistency dictates
therefore that the average acceleration length is much less than
, which is in evident conflict with
the weak field model. The conclusion is that there has to exist a
mechanism that limits the electron acceleration length, at least for
some particles, much more efficiently than the synchrotron losses
alone. One such mechanism is discussed in the remainder of this
paper.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: September 2, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |