Astron. Astrophys. 350, 566-570 (1999)
4. Discussion
The character of light and spectral changes of Be stars and their
mutual correlation has been the subject of a number of statistical
investigations. Nordth & Olofson (1977) and Hirata (1981) showed
that for the majority of Be variables the light increase is connected
with the reddening of index and
blueing of . Dachs (1982) found a
correlation between the light changes and the intensity of emission
and shell lines in the sense that the light maxima correspond to
larger equivalent widths, while the light minima are connected with
the intensity-maxima of the shell lines.
The concept of a positive and inverse correlation was formulated by
Harmanec (1983) and Harmanec (1994). The positive correlation is
characterised by simultaneous increase of both the Balmer emission and
the brightness, while in the colour diagram the star is changing its
luminosity but not the spectral class. A light decrease along with the
strengthening of the Balmer emission and, at the same time, a change
of spectral but not luminosity class is the characteristic of inverse
correlation. Harmanec (1983) interpreted the existence of the two
types of correlation as the aspect effect, the inverse correlation
being observed for stars seen roughly equator-on. This hypothesis was
supported by Hubert & Floquet (1998) who have shown that the
brightenings are characteristic for Be stars having small
v sin i values while the fadings are
associated with the rapid rotators.
In Fig. 4 we present the diagram
for the seasonal means of OT Gem. It is seen that during the
first four seasons of Hvar measurements, the star is becoming redder
in and slightly bluer in
. From 1992 to 1998 (HJD
2448705-2450195) OT Gem passed through at least three major
brightenings with an amplitude up to
0. 4 in V. It is seen from
Fig. 4 that the star in the active phases moved toward the supergiant
sequence of the diagram. Such
behaviour is typical for the positive correlation in Harmanec's
scheme. The lack of spectroscopic data at the time of outbursts does
not allow us to search for the correlation between the emission and
the position of OT Gem in the colour diagram.
According to Hubert & Floquet (1998) sudden brightenings in Be
stars are more frequent in early Be stars and there are three
categories of their manifestation: i) reccurent short-lived outbursts,
ii) long lived outbursts and iii) outbursts closely linked to a
temporary Be phase or strong emission line variations. OT Gem
should be classified as a member of the second class that is
characterized by amplitude variations from 0.15 to 0.35 in
and by the duration of an outburst
that exceed several hundreds days.
There are several other Be stars that exhibit behaviour similar as
OT Gem. Pavlovski et al. (1997) have found that 2 out of 48
objects from their set of well observed Be stars show occasional
sudden brightenings, o Cas Horn et al. (1985) and
QR Vul Pavlovski et al. (1983). The measurements secured at Hvar
Observatory indicate a positive correlation in the
diagram for these stars.
The well known rapid light and spectroscopic Be variable
CMa shows outbursts with a
maximum amplitude of 0. 4 as well as a
positive correlation between the emission strength and the brightness
- see Harmanec (1998a) and Stefl et al. (1998). Mennickent et al.
(1994) announced that at the active phase the light changes of the
star showed quasi-periodic oscillations up to
0. 1 with a mean period of 25 days.
Using a larger data sets Harmanec (1998a) was able to uncover the
34. 67 period both from spectroscopic
and photometric data. He has also pointed out the possibility that
those variations could be explained by the orbital motion in a binary
system with a highly eccentic orbit.
Recently, Carrier et al. (1999) have discovered the new Be variable
HR 2968 in the the open cluster NGC 2451. They showed that the
luminosity of the star started to increase in 1990 after a longer
period of constancy. The increase of brightness was accompanied with
oscillations around the mean light curve with a period of 371 days and
an amplitude of 0. 08 to
0. 10. In the colour-colour diagram
the star is moving from the main sequence toward the supergiant
sequence indicating again a positive correlation.
There are convincing arguments that OT Gem is observed under
an inclination far from . An estimate
made by Ruusalep (1989) put the value of the inclination in the range
from to
. Slettebak (1994) derived a rather
low rotational velocity v sin i =
130 km s-1 for OT Gem. Hanuschik (1996)
classified OT Gem as a non-shell star and concluded that a
significant part of the disk is projected against the sky. The
variation of the dimension and/or density of the inner disk may then
act as an apparent change of the radius of the object causing both the
light and colour variations (see Harmanec 1983). Harmanec (1998a)
describes the long-term variability and the outbursts of
CMa as a manifestation of the
formation and gradual dispersal of the circumstellar gaseous envelope.
Variations of OT Gem are in many aspects similar to that of
CMa and we believe that they
can be explained by the same physical process. Such an idea was also
suggested by Koubsky et al. (1997) for the explanation of the spectral
and photometric variations of the Be binary 4 Her, though for the
case of an inverse correlation. In that scheme, the new
optically-thick envelope that is created near the photospere in the
equatorial region can simulate the stellar photosphere. Consequently,
the apparent radius of the object grows and the brightness increases.
At the same time, the star moves toward the supergiant sequence in the
diagram. As the envelope expands and
rarifies, it becomes optically thin and brightness fades while in the
diagram the star goes back to the
main sequence.
Such a scenario is in good agreement with the light and colour
changes of OT Gem. The precursor to the quiet phase was the
sudden light increase observed by Figer (1981) in 1980-81.
Hubert-Delplace et al. (1982) reported that the Balmer discontinuity
in 1979 had been seen in absorption but in November 1980 it was in
emission. According to Divan et al. (1982), Be stars have two Balmer
discontinuities, one belonging to the underlying star and another one
corresponding to a low density plasma in the envelope. The variations
occur only in the later. A rise of the Balmer discontinuity may be an
indication of the formation of the new envelope.
It should be mentioned that in the concept described above, the
emission reaches a maximum after the light maximum as is
certainly observed in the case of
CMa- see, e.g., Harmanec
(1998a). In the later stages of the envelope evolution when the disk
is rarified, the brightness and emission both decrease. This closely
resembles the spectral and photometric behaviour of OT Gem during
the quiet phase from HJD 2444977 to 2446159. The previous episode of a
large brightening of the star (not shown in the diagram, but
documented by visual and photographic observations by Figer (1981) and
Berthold (1983)) was obviously followed, with some delay, by a steep
increase and a gradual decrease of the
H emission (see Fig. 1). In the
diagram, the star was moving towards
the main sequence changing its photometric luminosity class with
remaining nearly constant.
Notably, a binary interpretation of the cyclic light
variations was put forward in all above-mentioned cases. Ferro et al.
(1998) investigated the possibility that the cyclic light variations
of OT Gem during the active phase with a period between 70 and 80
days are caused by tidal effects of the unseen companion in an
eccentric orbit but they were not able to find any evidence of
binarity. As an explanation of the 34.
67 period in CMa Harmanec
(1998a) has suggested that the object could be a binary in an
eccentric orbit. To explain the 371-d photometric period of the Be
star HR 2968 Carrier et al. (1999) proposed also a binary model in
which the secondary in a highly eccentric orbit interacts
gravitationaly and radiatively with the disk around the primary. At
the moment, because of the lack of spectral observations, we were
unable to check on the possible duplicity of OT Gem. Such a
possibility should, however, be tested by dedicated observations of
all above-mentioned objects.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: October 4, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |