![]() | ![]() |
Astron. Astrophys. 350, 587-597 (1999) 5. Comparison between theoretical isochrones and observational data
We present in Fig. 2a and in Fig. 2b the HR diagram of the 33 stars of
Sample 1. We have split the sample in two subsamples: Fig. 2a
corresponds to stars of solar metallicity or close to it
( Fig. 2a shows that the stars of solar metallicity or close to it
lie in the region defined by the theoretical models corresponding to
their associated metallicity range. We notice the particular position
of However, it is worth to note that the slope of the theoretical main sequence agrees well with the observational slope. This, once more, is in favor of the uniqueness of the mixing-length parameter in low-mass stars. Furthermore the width of the global observed main-sequence band for metal-rich stars, which is around 0.3 mag, and the theoretical width corresponding to the same metallicity range with solar-scaled helium abundances are quite similar (see also Fig. 6). Turning now to the moderately deficient stars plotted in Fig. 2b we note that all the stars but one are outside the theoretical band corresponding to their metallicity . Stars are located on theoretical isochrones with a metallicity higher than their observed metallicity. The same behaviour is seen in the two other selected samples in which the effective temperatures of stars have been determined independently by different authors (see Sect. 3). Fig. 3a and 3b are similar to Fig. 2a and 2b but for the 64 stars with effective temperatures derived from detailed spectroscopic analysis (Sample 2) while Fig. 4a and 4b represent the situation of the 15 stars of Sample 3. Although the error bars on effective temperature are greater in Fig. 3a and 3b and although they are few objects in Fig. 4a and 4b, the same tendency is found, strengthening the conclusion that classical theoretical isochrones and actual observations of moderately metal deficient stars do not match. Note that, in the confrontation of observational position of stars
with stellar isochrones, errors on [Fe/H] and
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() © European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999 Online publication: October 4, 1999 ![]() |