Astron. Astrophys. 350, 685-693 (1999)
4. Parameters used in the simulation
To calculate the effects of dynamical friction, introduced in the
previous section, on a disc-like structure as KB, we cannot use the
classical Chandrasekhar (1943) theory but we need equations specified
for distributions like KB. These equations were written in the
previous section (Eqs. 8 - 11). To calculate the effect of dynamical
friction on the orbital evolution of the largest bodies we suppose
that and
are constants and that
= .
We need also the mass density distribution in the disc. We assume a
heliocentric (R) distribution in surface mass density
and a total primordial mass,
in the region
(Stern & Colwell 1997b). To
evaluate the dynamical friction force we need the spatial distribution
of the field objects, . To reproduce
the quoted surface density we need a number density decreasing as a
function of distance from the Sun, R, to the third power
(Levison & Duncan 1990):
![[EQUATION]](img125.gif)
We remember also that the KB is a disc and then we use the mass
distribution given by a Myiamoto-Nagai disc (Binney & Tremaine
1987; Wiegert & Tremaine 1997):
![[EQUATION]](img126.gif)
which in the disc plane reproduces the quoted surface density and
Eq. (15) . Here M is the disc
mass, a and b are parameters describing the disc
characteristic radius and thickness. Because there is presently no
information on the way in which ensemble-averaged inclinations
( ) and eccentricities
( ) vary in the KB, we adopt a disc
with a width (Stern 1996b). The
equations of motion were integrated in heliocentric coordinates using
the Bulirsch-Stoer method.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: October 4, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |