 |  |
Astron. Astrophys. 350, 985-996 (1999)
6. Red clump giants
As discussed in Sect. 5 giants probably do not pose a problem for
the identification of the (200, 3 6)
feature by means of dwarf stars exclusively. In Fig. 9 the lower
dotted line represents a reddening line of a MV =
+1 0 star located at 2.6 kpc. We have
assumed that the bluest value of (V-I)0 for a
MV = +1 0 giant is
0 8,
see Egret et al. (1997). Recall that 2.6 kpc and AV
= 2 8 defines the blue envelope of the
CG 31 tail box displayed in Fig. 3. This reddening line shifted to the
bright side by V =
2m magnitudes fits the upper envelope in Fig. 9. It
seems most unlikely that a bright confinement of a color magnitude
diagram should have the exact slope of the reddening vector by
coincidence. This is a very interesting situation: a group of stars
exactly spread out along a reddening line means that they are of a
very well defined type, located at the same distance but experiencing
a large range of reddening. Measured along the upper confinement (V-I)
ranges from
1 0 to
3 2. We suggest that this string of
stars must belong to a most ordinary stellar type and since it cannot
be LC V, the most frequent class next to the main sequence stars are
the red clump giants. Furthermore very well defined with
MV = +1 0 and
(V-I)0 = 1.0 either with a very small spread, see e.g.
Fig. 3.5.5 and 3.5.6 in the Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues Vol. 1
(ESA 1997). If this identification is correct the clump giants are
located almost exactly 1 kpc away and their absorption ranges from nil
to AV = 6 2. Stars
with V within
0 3 of
the upper red envelope do show a noticeable concentration in Fig. 1,
they are mainly found in a
7´ 7´ box shown in
Fig. 1. At 1 kpc this angular extent means that they are located
within a diameter of 2.3 pc.
Incidentally 1000 pc is almost the distance to the Gum Nebula center.
We are pretty convinced that the giant identification is right with a
rather high degree of probability. Of the 14 stars within
0 3
from the reddest envelope nine have complete
uvby colors from our Strömgren
survey of the region. Of these seven are classified as giants only two
seems to be late type dwarfs, their c1 values are much too
small for giants. In Fig. 9 the two dwarfs are located at (V-I,V) =
(1.315,12.120) and (1.788,13.371) respectively. The success rate for
identifying red clump giants along the red confinement is accordingly
more than 50 .
If the giant interpretation is right the reddest stars between the
two dotted lines in Fig. 9 might sample some of the most obscured
lines of sight. We select stars with (V-I)
3 0
and V
18 8 which if they are red clump stars
will be absorbed by more than
5 5
magnitudes in V. Their location are plotted as the large filled
circles in Fig. 1. Apart from two directions they seem closely
associated to the cometary globules' edges or their tails. The two
"discrepant" sight lines are however pointed in a direction where
Fig. 1 indicates a very low number of stars per unit area: (X, Y)
(1400, -200). Possibly suggesting a
minor hitherto unrecognized globule.
From inspection of Fig. 2 or Fig. 9 the bulk of stars seems to have
a rightmost confinement apparently parallel to the reddening vector.
In Fig. 9 the thick dashed line shows the reddening line for red clump
giants at 9.3 kpc from the Sun, with RGC = 8.5 kpc
putting red clump giants 14.5 kpc
from the Milky Way center. We note the dramatic difference of the
number of stars to the bright and faint side of this line. In Fig. 10
we show a contour plot of the stellar density sampled in (V-I,V) boxes
sized 0 1 and
0 5 in (V-I) and V respectively. In
Fig. 10 a reddening vector is fitted to the 12 stars/box contour, the
line has its bluest point approximately at the intrinsic color of the
red clump giants. The V-MV shift is
14 25 and as mentioned since the red
clump giants have a strongly peaked MV distribution
at MV = +1m such a reddening line
sample clump stars stars at identical distance but with very different
amounts of reddening. The stars along the 12 stars/box contour are
thus 7.1 kpc from the Sun and those along the 30 stars/box contour
also nearly parallel to the reddening vector but located at 8.9 kpc.
Assuming RGC = 8.5 kpc red clump giants located on
the two reddening lines are at 13 and 14 kpc from the Galaxy's center
respectively. The absorption range for stars along either reddening
line is from AV 0
to AV
Vlim-16
5m. One could wonder why a reddening line fits the
slope of an iso-density contour? Why are there identical numbers of
stars with any absorption between 0 and 5? Perhaps not so strange
after all if we postulate that only the diffuse medium of the disk
causes the absorption of these remote stars, if molecular matter was
the absorbing agent the absorption would probably be larger, as
discussed in the previous sections and the stars accordingly much
nearer. If the absorption is diffuse it seems evenly distributed
between a minimum and maximum value as shown in Jonch-Sorensen (1994).
If the structure of the local diffuse medium is representative on a
scale of several kpcs the reddening distribution broadens with
distance and any reddening between the minimum and maximum values
observed, have the same probability. The local version of this trend
may be seen within 400 pc in Fig. 1 of Knude (1979), where stars
between 250 and 400 pc have a completely flat distribution and those
between 30 and 80 pc have a peaked distribution.
![[FIGURE]](img136.gif) |
Fig. 10. Stellar density in the color - magnitude diagram, sampled in 0.1 and 0.5 magnitude bins in (V-I) and V respectively. The dashed line indicates a reddening line adapted to the 12 star per (V-I,V) box iso-contour by a shift V - MV = 14 25, the 30 stars per (V-I,V) box is fitted with a similar 14 75 shift
|
The 12-30 star/box contours may in fact indicate the edge of the
Milky Way. Stars nearer than 7-9 kpc, we mean red clump giants
exclusively, will be on a line shifted upwards whereas more remote
ones will be on a line shifted downwards. If the dust disk is
exponential the reddening taking place in the outer parts becomes
less, this means that if we observe red clump giants with
AV 0 at 13-14 kpc
we have an equal probability to encounter red clump giants with
AV 0 at larger
distances from the center - that is if they exist. But as Fig. 9 shows
virtually no stars with (V-I) 0.8-0.9
are observed for V
16m indicating that the central distance for disk
stars has an upper limit at 13-14 kpc. 13-14 kpc may accordingly
estimate the optical disk radius. A rather interesting thought that
the disk size may be estimated, model independent, from deep V and I
observations, only requirement is the solar distance from the Galactic
center.
© European Southern Observatory (ESO) 1999
Online publication: October 14, 1999
helpdesk.link@springer.de  |